Just published a contrarian take on so-called “AI losers” that I think are mispriced.
The mistake: assuming AI deletes demand, rather than reshaping workflows.
In enterprise settings, AI usually:
• automates the easy path
• creates complexity (edge cases, QA, compliance)
• shifts value to whoever owns the workflow
That distinction matters for investors.
Several incumbents are priced as if AI would erase their revenue.
A more likely outcome:
• demand shifts
• unit economics change
• incumbents sell AI back into their installed base
That’s the setup.
The piece looks at three names across the stack:
• Teleperformance — scaled CX operations
• Text S.A. — customer communication & orchestration
• RWS — language, content, and IP workflows
Different businesses. Same market overreaction.
Why these work as a basket:
• AI panic already priced in
• expectations are low
• outcomes don’t need to be heroic for re-ratings
Two of them also pay solid dividends.
This isn’t risk-free:
• pricing pressure
• execution risk
• slower-than-expected pivots
But when stocks price in unlikely catastrophes, “normal” outcomes can surprise.
Full piece here:
https://t.co/93z5qwBLW5
Thoughtful pushback welcome. Happy to debate.
The US naval blockade is definitely biting, and Iranian crude exports are cratering, but the street is completely misreading the mechanics here.
Iran's oil export engine is nothing but a massive, structural money-and-logistics laundering matrix. On the physical side, the whole game is evading US eyes to scrub Iranian barrels and make them look completely kosher on paper.
The second these tankers clear the Strait of Hormuz or hit the Indian Ocean, they flip the switch and turn off their AIS. They’ll even manually paint over or mask the hull numbers to stay invisible to satellite tracking.
The real action happens via STS transfers in the EOPL or UAE, bleeding the cargo into un-sanctioned dark fleet.
While doing this, they doctor the Bill of Lading to wipe the origin clean, magically re-christening Iranian crude as Malaysian Blend or Omani barrels.
Those barrels eventually show up at the doorsteps of Shandong Teapots in China to discharge. That’s exactly why Beijing's official import prints show a massive spike in Malaysian volumes, while Iranian imports look like zero.
Obviously, standard trade finance rails like SWIFT and USD clearing are dead in the water. To bypass this, Tehran runs a bulletproof shadow banking network.
They’ve layered dozens of shell companies across Dubai, Hong Kong, and Turkey. Domestic Iranian networks, like the Amin Exchange, act as the central bank for these offshore front accounts.
The tape settles in RMB or AED, never greenbacks. Once a teapot wires cash to a shell account, the funds are instantly fractured and routed across multiple front profiles via Hawala style to completely blind any tracking.
When cash routing hits a brick wall, they just pivot to straight-up barter—clearing the oil bill in exchange for Chinese refined products, industrial machinery, consumer goods, or military hardware components.
This entire clunky setup creates a massive lag in the cash conversion cycle. Moving from Iranian loading docks, steaming dark at low speeds, floating in international waters waiting for an STS window, forging the papers, and finally getting the teapots to clear customs takes a solid 60 to 90 days.
Even when the teapots pay up, washing that money back through UAE and Hong Kong shells until it turns into spendable dry powder (or hard goods) for Tehran or the IRGC takes another 60 to 90 days.
Bottom line: Iran is running on a 3 to 6 month delay from the time the oil leaves the ground to when they can actually spend the cash.
This duration risk and the structural discount blow out even wider whenever the US drops a combined hammer—like the Economic Fury campaign—targeting not just the dark fleet, but the financial nodes and clearing desks in Hong Kong and the UAE at the same time.
Every sweep locks up accounts and forces them to rebuild their routing from scratch.
So the liquidity hitting Iran's balance sheet today is cash from oil traded months ago. Since they're still clearing out the oil on water floating outside the Strait, it’s going to take months before their actual financial runway gets cut off.
But the real macro question everyone is missing is this: these guys already proved they can survive on zero exports during the COVID pandemic. Why is everyone so sure this cycle plays out differently? Who breaks first under the weight of time—Tehran or Washington?
That’s the real chart worth watching.
#oott #iran
Hope that you're all long Oil E&Ps and services.
Suppressing the market with "imminent deal" reports will only work for so long, and will just cause a more violent move upwards once a tipping point is reached.
@peter_d1188@MadisonCKS Check all Barak Ravid's "scoops" about imminent deals over the past month. None of which were true and Iran denied many of them immediately.
Either they intentionally fabricate leaks or they're incompetent, pick whichever you prefer.
@peter_d1188@MadisonCKS Check all Barak Ravid's "scoops" about imminent deals over the past month. None of which were true and Iran denied many of them immediately.
Either they intentionally fabricate leaks or they're incompetent, pick whichever you prefer.
Interesting to note the divergence in pricing directions between US and Chinese AI firms. Deepseek V4 output is now 30x (!) cheaper than US SOTA models.
@JenniferJJacobs@staunovo Another fake news slop report. Iran has said that nuclear enrichment restrictions are off the table repeatedly and consistently.
Muting this account. I will RT reliable sources - follow me to stay on top of what's really going on.
Rubio: I believe there will be news today on the Iran issue. There is progress. I will leave it to the President. The main issue is that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon; the Strait of Hormuz is related to this. It is an international shipping area and is not under their control.
It looks like Iran is still demanding $200 billion+ war reparations too. I can't see Trump ever agreeing to that, and Iran probably knows that.
It could be that Iran is just trying to drag this out as much as possible to maximise its leverage, while also being fully prepared to endure any military action.
BREAKING: Iran says contrary to what the US claims, the now fully leaked "Memorandum of Understanding" contains no Iranian commitments to hand over nuclear stockpiles, remove equipment, shut down nuclear facilities, or even commit to not build a nuclear bomb. Instead, all nuclear issues are deferred to a 60 day period of negotiations after signing, per Fars News.
For this period to start, the US would need to accept no nuclear commitments from Iran, agree to release $100 billion of Iranian frozen assets, lift the naval blockade, lift all oil and petrochemical sanctions during the negotiation period, pay $270 billion in war reparations, and accept Hormuz under "full permanent sovereign Iranian management and authority" at pre-war traffic levels with no US presence.
@robin_j_brooks your comments below reveal a profound lack of understanding of the oil market. Commodity futures price inventory, NOT expectations. That isn't ideology; it's a fact grounded in the economics of carry.
The Brent price in your graph is not a risk anyone can actually hold — it's a spot contract stitched together at each expiry. In normal times that's a fair proxy; these are not normal times. Construct a series an investor could truly hold — a rolled BCOM index, or the USO ETF — and the picture inverts: it slopes hard up and to the right, consistent with the largest supply shock in history.
USO keeps climbing because the shortage is showing up in the futures curve — not in the headline price on the screen. The carry pays an investor nearly 50% a year, even if the price of oil never moves.
The SPR was drawn down before commercial inventories — when it is normally the other way round. Strategic stocks are meant to be the last line of defence, not the first, but this time Washington spent them first, managing headlines not risk.
When you have no crude in storage, THEN and only then will the spot price move to a level to destroy demand. I have no idea if it is 150, or 200, or 250. The observed indication from Asia is ~200.
@lexrus If you now ask gpt5.5 to review it in a fresh thread it will find more stuff to "fix". Here's the thing - some of those fixes will actually break things.