@goblinodds There’s a lot of stuff in here but just one thing that stands out to me - the concept of red/blue tribe feels inherently a bit suspect to me. Perhaps this is partly being in the uk, but it feels like the act of tying oneself to the current us manifestation of a tribe does no good
@goblinodds@funplings You can’t trust writers… give em the chance and suddenly everybody is covered in issues! from a bg2 pov there’s a lot of the bases being covered - people went feral for viconia (evil drow priestess romance), thence minthara. Big missing thing is pure silly eg jan jansson
@goblinodds@funplings Tbf there’s a reason that goes back 25 years+ in crpgs; the vanilla good romance options were so despised by players they became notorious for being awful (eg carth in kotor or anomen in bg2). Every romance people liked/talked about was weird in one way or another!
@JoshuaLWatson The trick is the word “knowledge” I think; these questions tend to rest on implicitly making all true knowledge “knowledge how”. You don’t truly know exercise is good for you because you don’t exercise, etc. not ultimately useful because common usage and understanding is diff
@goblinodds A single message or derived thing, I feel… but then again; different things do land so differently (and potentially so negatively) that you have to account for these things I suppose!
@goblinodds Many of my favourite sequences of words come from the prose of Samuel Beckett; many are things I find deeply funny or beautiful, but completely unaligned with the overall feeling of a text. Consider eg fizzle 3, afar a bird… nobody can make themselves coherent enough to have