@ADogmaticCaveat@Fetchbetch70879@allldiamonds Technically no one had "freedom" because everyone was focused on survival, humanity wasn't that advanced unlike someone from the 18/1900s I can sit my ass down and not work most of the day
@ADogmaticCaveat@Fetchbetch70879@allldiamonds Nigga what are you on about a woman back then could literally own their husbands house when they die, do you think women just end up on the streets when their husband dies and no one gets the property? You must be lost
@ADogmaticCaveat@Fetchbetch70879@allldiamonds No ones saying they don't like it I'm saying women claim they don't have anything when back then they could literally get whatever they want lol
@ADogmaticCaveat@Fetchbetch70879@allldiamonds No one saying it's an issue though, you guys are, why do you care so much about bank accounts when you can buy whatever without taking responsibility? C'mon slow poke i know you can do better
@ADogmaticCaveat@Fetchbetch70879@allldiamonds Wrong again, women back then owned houses, cars, land and ect. And if their husband dies they can take his property you're making generalizations silly goose
@ADogmaticCaveat@Fetchbetch70879@allldiamonds Wrong, wrong again, if you don't wanna be a mom don't have sex or use protection doofus it's called accountability, and yes you should close your legs and if you don't want aggressive men beating you over sex maybe go somewhere private or don't interact with him
@ADogmaticCaveat@Fetchbetch70879@allldiamonds You can deadass use your husbands credit card to buy a car and if he gets into debt the burden isn't on you it's on him to repay it lol you guys are so spoiled
@ADogmaticCaveat@Fetchbetch70879@allldiamonds Women always owned property even when their husband died, and women didn't have bank accounts because they didn't have to handle debt, idk why women like you think women back then had it hard when they didn't lol
@GAMERGAMER53261@therealzunda@adhee1673 It obviously is because it's an easily identifiable object, I mean when it comes to humans, animals and ect. What im trying to say is you're using depictions to justify fiction itself when fiction has many tricks and twists so again just a depiction doesn't always make it true
@CaydoRocks05@DeclMilss@adhee1673 I can't go full black and full white because that's an assumption, it can vary from many things such as again, cute appearance, height, personality, youth and ect. This is common sense you can't assume what someone likes you must make a list of suggestions
@CaydoRocks05@DeclMilss@adhee1673 Because I never seen it happen doofus didn't bother doing research but yea AI crosses the line because AI uses faces from people that actually exists to train itself and make modules
@Deimos22972923@therealzunda@adhee1673 If you actually read my comment instead of being impulsive I specifically said "depictions aren't always guaranteed" if you were to ask me obviously that is clearly a depiction of a baby
@Deimos22972923@therealzunda@adhee1673 And no I would cross the line with AI because ai uses actual faces from real people to train itself, making a fictional character out of scratch is okay but using a real person as reference isn't fictional because the person actually exists