@PredebutVTuber@noname2095_ A very confused and even, dare I say, mentally ill individual. She posted this right before blocking me, declaring that the pro-PRC LGBT people today are just like the LGBT people who supported Hitler in the 1930s.
Scoop: Chinese Professor Sues Southern Methodist University (@smu) over Discrimination by Indian Professors
"The Accounting Department granted tenure to 100 percent of Indian-origin candidates, while denying tenure to 100 percent of non-Indian candidates."
link in comment 👇
Fourteen years since we last spoke.
Your face is still distinct in the photos I revisit, your hair still black.
Time has made our status quo quotidian and each Mother's Day seem a little less stormy.
I cycle through the set scenes we have.
The walk-up in Dalian, where you completed your first book, only for me to destroy the floppy disks. You rewrote without reproach.
The flat in Beijing, where you sat up all night to finish my Lego, Air Tech Claw Rig, 1992, because I could not forgive you for leaving. By morning your eyes were bloodshot.
Our earthworm site in the Sea, where you sat and watched as Ba dug.
The lily pond in Beidaihe, where we lapped around with Laolao, and marched as we sang.
Then falling into you, after a homesick month and eighty-seven unanswered emails at boarding school.
Your world stills and mine moves.
Each day of your absence adds to the weight of iniquity.
What you have endured has surpassed 黑眉爷, and is catching up to 白眉爷, who each walked their own long march to exoneration.
Let the world have its capricious judgements.
As you told me: as long as I know the truth, it is ok.
There are people who’ve lived in China their entire lives who are incredibly ignorant of China’s borderlands/internal colonies
Saying this as a foreigner is just one step above “I know what I’m talking about cuz I have a Chinese wife!!”
I feel sorry for either this person or their PhD advisor for them to say "The thing that still matters —> taste <— was never really taught". This is *most* of what my advisor taught me; the rest (semantics, coding, etc) was just hard work; he answered questions and gave feedback.
我昨天去纽约长岛Optimum前台办事。事毕,浓发棕眼的年轻客服笑问:“你是中国人吗?”我答:“是的,我来自中国广东。”
他点开自己的手机,向我出示锁屏照片,一位面貌姣好、身材娇小的亚裔女士。“很漂亮可爱,她是你妻子吗?”我问。他说:“是的,我的妻子来自���国台湾。“
他解开外套,指着圆领衬衫上的五星红旗,用结结巴巴的中文说:“我爱中国。”
我笑着用英文说:“The one you love is a Chinese woman.”
University of Oxford postgraduate student Catherine Xu, the Oxford Union’s President-Elect for Michaelmas 2026, has been removed from the position and permanently barred from holding office at the Society after an Election Tribunal found that she committed electoral fraud by orchestrating a scheme to impersonate legitimate voters at the Hilary Term 2026 election.
Xu was found to have distributed union membership cards to non-members to vote on polling day.
Tribunal documents state that Xu was found guilty of procuring “the impersonation of members of the society at the poll … by supplying an instrument and/or the Oxford Union membership card … for the purpose of enabling other persons to cast ballots at the poll in the names borne on them”.
During the tribunal, which sat on April 25-26, Xu was found to have handed out a stack of union membership cards on polling day to people not entitled to vote and told them to cast ballots in other members’ names.
A number of students were caught on Mar 6 voting using the identification of other members by Leo Zhou, a candidate for the secretary’s committee, who confronted them.
They were reportedly voting in favor of Xu and other candidates of Asian origin, the document stated.
Yolanda Liu, a candidate for the secretary’s committee, was found to have received six cards from Xu and handed at least one out on polling day.
The pair discussed the process of “finding people” on 🇨🇳 WeChat, while Xu told Liu to be “especially careful”.
She also sent a voicenote to Liu a few days after the election in which she asked whether she still had “the cards”, which the tribunal found to be “particularly damning”.
Celine Li also wrote a witness statement, in which she claimed she had given a membership card belonging to Lisa Chung and told to vote on her behalf for Ea Ventura Marty and Xu.
A total of seven charges were brought against Xu, including threatening and intimidating another student named Zhou “with the purpose and/or effect of deterring him from reporting electoral malpractice to the returning office”.
Following the outcome of the tribunal, Xu has been disqualified from the Hilary Term 2026 election, and from nominating in any current or future election in the Union. She has further been “permanently barred from holding any Office, Appointed role, or official position in the Society”, “permanently barred from sitting on any Committee of the Society, with the exception of Consultative Committee”, and “suspended as a Member until the end of 9th Week Trinity Term 2026”.
Liu’s membership has likewise been suspended, and she has also been disqualified from the Hilary Term 2026 election.
Xu denied the allegations levelled against her and dismissed them as “political drama”.
She said: “I strongly reject the findings against myself and deny that any conspiracy existed. I am deeply concerned that the decision appears to rely on evidence I believe to be fabricated or materially unreliable, yet imposes an extraordinarily severe and disproportionate penalty.
“The union has seen increasing political drama and decisions based on contested evidence in recent years, and such a verdict risks encouraging more anonymous and fabricated allegations. This case must receive strict appeal review, with full procedural fairness and transparency.”
A re-poll to choose the president is to take place on Monday May 11.
Xu was elected to the role in March, winning ahead of Liza Barkova, Gareth Lim and Hamza Hussain. In her manifesto, she had proposed a new access membership fund, moving procedural motions away from Thursday debates and inviting more female speakers.
Before the election, Xu had said: “The union is way bigger than its scandals, but the perceived dysfunction keeps drowning out the good. I want to help fix that.”
https://t.co/KvEU89NYWt
https://t.co/QLfN70oqTK
NeurIPS authors: remember to write papers not just for the reviewers who barely skim them, but also for the chatbots who actually read them and write the reviews.