Christian, pro-life, limited govt, US Constitution, Biblical creationist. Materialistic evolution=impossible:How did sexual reproduction evolve, scientifically?
@elonmusk What about "silent" and long-term mistreatment? That is, not an immediate impact but a long term failure to recognize or allow value in a company or future employer or relationship?
@RyanWal83803708@garysavage1 Ppl, who are FREE and involved win, unless there's a mandate to not assemble for grievances and the ppl comply.
Remember 2020.
Free ppl speak freely. If ur not free, all other rights disappear.
@SPortoghesi@sarahsalviander Stefano.. Christianity, more specifically, Jesus Christ is the only person to predict his death and bodily resurrection. No other religion has a person to die, rise from the grave, physically live and not physically die again. Only God can raise ppl from being dead.
@Sean_McDowell Probability of materialistic evolution being true is zero. Given 3 dimensions and time with a continuous variable 4 each. This means that 2nd occurrence of reproduction at the same time and place is impossible, let alone 3rd++ occurrences. This ignores storage of content etc.
@louiseb134@DanFriedman81 @Travis_in_Flint Another government "solution"?? You have term limits with each election cycle. Age? So, if wisdom comes with age, typically, you're throwing out the wise. The solution is to get your ass off the couch and work for a constitutional republic. Complain? Ok! No involvement? Worthless
@leadlagreport XLK hits 170 maybe even 190. But it's highly weighted w top tech stars (no typo). SPX should do well until Sept/Oct then maybe a stall. You are correct on underlying market. SPX bottom not in yet. Double top? We will see.
AU n AG have upside, patience!!
Fed Reserve shud reserve $
@patrina_chia@afshineemrani Not necessarily true. We have PhD and JDs with extremely high appreciation of parents and G-Ps and ancestry. My brother has 2 highly successful engineers. Personal faith in a living God, Christ, is "95+%" of it. Other "5%" is how they're treated.
@VictoryDay_Hope Lots of assumptions in the graphic. 1 is the accuracy/solution of the instruments throughout the measurement period; 2 control of external factor; 3 stability of solar activity (sun); 4 an exponential or non-linear approach to human input as population changes. CC is bad science
@DonDurrett @FrankBaere my custom oscillators indicate general market is @ 56 vs a 20/80 range which is the inverse probability of making $. IE, 80 is 1-80 or 20% prob on long side. History: low: osc was @ 30 eom 3/20; 32 eom 6/22; 32 eom 9/22; tops: eom 8/21 88. not @ top yet. New SPX hi com'g. Then๐จ
@rAnDomlycHaD@aigkenham Koy... There are assumptions here. One consistent rate throughout all time; no external influences; known initial conditions. You're using current science & extrapolating. Scripture says that God "stretched" the heavens. If true, the time to cross new distance is greater than b4.
@aigkenham One cannot accept the sequence of "Big Bang" & also the sequence of Gen 1. Either one is true & other is false OR both are false. Since Scripture is divinely inspired and represents God, Christ and the Holy Spirit what is sequentially stated must be true. BB is NOT Scriptural
@BartemyS@NJBeisner@akaBarni The "silent majority" is a contradiction. If you're "silent" no one knows about what you feel or believe. There is no "majority" if you're silent. You aren't counted if silent.
I use data, science, math and logic. I'm not silent & facts don't care if it's a minority r majority.
@space_city_emp @drewciferponald @tperkins ur comment "Paul never describes the men's acts as 'unnatural'..." See the Greek in Rom 1:27ish "..arsenes aphentes ten phusiken...arsenese en arsensin.." males having left natural desires for females.. males with males desires. Hence, I would disagree with your comment(s).
@space_city_emp @drewciferponald @tperkins Paul, Jewish & then accepted Christ post-resurrection, is LC relative to xSM. His LC is within the context of Jewish bkgrnd & new life in Christ. Hence, homosexuality (HS/xSM) is unnatural. Why SSMarriage not prohibited? HS/SS/xS act is wrong so xSM is wrong by extension.
@space_city_emp @drewciferponald @tperkins Ur going n circles w ur logic n bringing up tangents. I addressed ICor & Rom. Scripture is consistent n M/M r F/F relationships not being natural (Rom 1:27ish). Logical consistency (LC) w/n Scripture and author!! LC is key 2 ne book r theology. Distinguish btwn believers n unbel.