@JoyceWhiteVance There would have to be a special verdict form, which seems way too complex. Wouldn't it be easier to drop the overt acts that the Court found were performed as part of Meadows official position as Chief of Staff?
@JoyceWhiteVance But, if you only need one overt act to convict on RICO, and if some of Meadows' overt acts were performed in his official federal position as Chief of Staff, how would a Court be able to tell that a conviction was not based solely on acts he took as part of his federal position?