1. We used the Dublin agreement as much as anyone sensible I.e. not much cos it’s far more cumbersome & expensive to horse trade humans back & forth to different countries than to process their claims. Overall as many people arrived through Dublin as left most years.
2. The Lorries continue to be a key method of entry to this day, there was a marked shift in 2020 when the pandemic halted most freight to small boats as primary, but never the sole method.
3. All evidence from all countries at all times show this adaptability of smuggling routes - when one becomes less viable, another, often more dangerous one replaces it. It is a game of cat and mouse with no end.
4. Politically for France, becoming the dumping ground for refugees the British don’t want to deal with because of their geographic location one stop to the east of us is obviously not plausible. Why should they stay in France? Why should France not send them to Italy? What does Italy then Have to say?
5. We pay the French to patrol their border, but every time a boat is stopped, the people on board are left again, destitute & without solution in northern France, and they simply try again. Most people who make it to the uk have tried multiple times. They will keep trying or die.
6. You can’t force those people to claim asylum in France, they very often have good reason to wish to reach the uk. You can’t make them disappear, you can only throw more money & more brutality at the question.
7. “Replacing” the people trying to get here with hand picked “preferred”
Or supposedly more “genuine” people from elsewhere is conceited & simply fails to deal with the actual problem: THESE people are here. They have rights, are very often refugees with connections to the uk, and need meaningful solutions.
8. This is why any search for solutions that starts with “how do we in the uk make these people just be someone else’s problem?” Is doomed to fail. You have to be realistic and you have to recognise people have rights and need to move. If we start from the acceptance of the need fr real solutions for those real people, in partnership with real other countries, not dumping grounds, the answer, I wild hope, becomes obvious.
NEW: A convicted money launderer has operated at the highest level of UK politics for a decade. Why? Because Farage has enjoyed almost total impunity from the UK press.
In my new piece for @thenerve_news, I expose the decade of denial that’s enabled him to act with impunity
1/
The Chancellor has the power to stop Farage's cynical ploy. I've written to her this morning urging her to act.
Farage should not be allowed to resign until the investigation into his dodgy dealings has concluded. The people of Clacton deserve the facts first.
The story of George Cottrell’s involvement with Nigel Farage is completely wild. He was UKIP’s head of fundraising & Farage’s closest aide when busted by feds while with Farage in US & charged with 21 counts inc money laundering, wire fraud & extortion
https://t.co/2HwBODzH1A
Remember how I said if scheme looks like money laundering & smells like money laundering, Brexit Party’s should prove it’s *not* money laundering? That was before I knew an *actual* money launderer involved. Meet George Cottrell. Convicted felon. And acting Brexit Party treasurer
This is nuts. Here’s Brexit Party taking donations in dollars. Which PayPal magically turns into £. Remember: it’s illegal in Britain for parties to accept foreign donations. Brexit Party seem to think they’ve found a loophole because less than £500..but surely still illegal?
NEW: here’s *actual* evidence that Nigel Farage’s Brexit Party is accepting foreign donations via PayPal. Dollars, yuan, Swiss francs, roubles..you name it, they’ll take it. Laundered by PayPal into British £. This *cannot* be legal, surely?? Electoral Commission MUST investigate
@RobertJenrick James McMurdock: convicted criminal
George Cottrell: convicted criminal
Ant Middleton: convicted criminal
Derek Chisora: convicted criminal
Nathan Gill: convicted criminal
Jack Denny: convicted criminal
Andy Osborn: convicted criminal
Give it up, Bobby!
A multimillion £ "gift" is nobody's business, yet a pair of spectacles are "on the take" and are of national interest.
The king of hypocrisy "do as I say, not as I do"
THE JOURNALIST WHO BROKE CAMBRIDGE ANALYTICA WAS THANKED WITH A £1 MILLION LEGAL BILL
Carole Cadwalladr @carolecadwalla exposed one of the biggest political scandals in modern British history. Cambridge Analytica. Brexit dark money. Possible Russian influence in UK democracy. The kind of journalism that wins Pulitzer nominations and keeps people in power very nervous.
So what happened next?
Arron Banks the man who made the biggest single political donation in UK history at around £9 million to Brexit campaigns, sued her personally. Not The @observer , which published her work for years. Not @TEDTalks, which hosted her talk. Her. Individually. A freelance journalist.
The suit was over one sentence in a 2019 TED Talk and a single tweet, in which she said Banks had lied about a secret relationship with the Russian government. Banks denied it. He had, however, admitted meeting Russian embassy officials multiple times more than he originally told a Parliamentary committee.
@guardian, her own publisher, declined to fund her defence.
She crowdfunded her legal costs from 29,000 members of the public.
She faced potential costs of up to £1 million. She eventually won on the main issues in the High Court in 2022, but lost on appeal on one narrow point.
She was ordered to pay Banks £35,000 in damages, issue an apology, and delete certain tweets. She was also hit with a costs order of over £1 million.
The woman who exposed how democracy gets bought had to beg the public for money to stay solvent while doing it.
Seventeen press freedom organisations called the case an attempt to intimidate and silence public interest journalism. The UK government eventually introduced anti-SLAPP legislation. Partly because of what happened to her.
In the UK, you can crowdfund a journalist's survival costs after she exposes the possible corruption of a referendum ..
.. Or you can fund the laws that protect journalists before they get financially destroyed.
We chose the first option.
WWII Veteran and Purple Heart recipient Robert Hilliard:
"Next week I'll be 101 years old. In February 1944 when I was 18 years old I was inducted into the army and what they taught me to do there was to kill people who set up detention camps. Can you imagine how I felt earlier this year when they announced that one of the future detention camps would be at that same camp landing in Florida? We have a fascist, a fascist government, that allows innocent people to be put in detention camps and incarcerated."
Source: @tomaskenn
🆘 @LSEnews explains that the costs of Brexit are not just about exports, but about supply chains, productivity and wages.
Brexit didn’t take back control. It took away competitiveness.
Brexit-related trade barriers have rippled through supply chains, reducing employment and pay, particularly in businesses reliant on imports from the EU.
For farming, Brexit wasn’t just a tax on exports – it became a tax on production.
It made it harder to sell into Europe AND more expensive to produce in Britain. Every customs declaration, export health certificate, border delay and disrupted supply chain adds cost before a farmer has sold a single tonne of food.
And while our European competitors continue to enjoy frictionless access to their biggest market, British farmers are left carrying the costs of Brexit.
Nigel Farage and Reform UK want to
- leave the European Convention on Human Rights which protects our right to protest, our right to privacy, our right to fair trials and so much more
- repeal the Equality Act - a key piece of legislation that prevents against discrimination in Britain
- Strip back workers rights
- Lift restrictions on exploitative zero-hours contracts and Legalize "fire and rehire" tactics
- repeal the Renters’ Rights Act which abolishes “no fault evictions” that allow landlords to remove tenants without giving a reason and introduces new duties over health hazards
and to sell all this to the country Farage offers nothing in return but grievance and division. PLEASE DON’T FALL FOR IT.
That anyone could be supporting Farage and Reform with these policies must surely be a damning indictment of UK media in failing to explain all this to the public
🚨 MELTING TICE 🚨
Tice’s appearance on Bloomberg’s Zero podcast was a car crash. Reform UK’s "energy spokesman" dismissed batteries as “ridiculous”, claimed “thousands” of scientists reject climate science, yet failed to name any. He even threatened to walk out when confronted with IPCC evidence.
With Reform opposing wind, solar and batteries, his answer to the energy crisis is simply: “drill, drill, frack Lincolnshire.
Source: https://t.co/u84CaBbvS0
and Private Eye