@JohnPasalis Because demand fell because of unprecedented population decline.
Obviously when economists said “not enough supply” it was in relation to very high demand. Cutting demand obviously works too.
@LDSLaw@ThatICUGuy Forget about the environmental impact, if everyone stopped recycling, a 7.99 12-pack of soda would go to around 11.99 as the metal costs roughly quintupled. They’d probably stop selling cans so much and shift to small plastic bottles instead. I would find that annoying.
@LDSLaw@ThatICUGuy That’s true for plastic, but aluminum recycling is actually incredibly efficient, saves a ton of money. If we didn’t do it at all, aluminum would cost around five times as much because we would have to put a lot more resources into mining.
Agreed that CPC should stop sucking at politics, but note that the Liberals have a majority precisely because the grandfather clause and senatorial clause give QC and the small provinces 22 special-treatment seats above the initial population-based allocation.
Only a hissy fit will do, which just feeds the beast of illiberalism, grievance and jettisoning rule of law and institutions.
Conservatives should stop blaming others for their problems. If you don’t like federal policies, stop sucking at politics and elect someone else.
@howardanglin@cselley You asked a broader question at the end of your tweet. The answer is we have weird laws around alcohol because people love it but it’s also extremely costly to society (cancer, crime, injuries, domestic abuse, etc.) and we try to find tolerable ways to limit the damage.
@cselley@howardanglin The logic is why are we comparing alcohol to ordinary consumer goods rather than other powerful psychoactive drugs? Are powerful psychoactive drugs typically sold for recreational use without restrictions?
@menard_ray@isabell53888198@jkenney I get your argument that richer regions subsidizing poorer regions is standard in federal systems, but, uh, that doesn’t exactly make the case to a rich region that it should stay in a federal system.
@menard_ray@isabell53888198@jkenney In this case I think it’s beside the point; the broader idea is Albertans pay more in federal taxes than the federal government spends in Alberta, so by leaving, it could replace federal services and still have a surplus which could be used to finance paying for federal land.
@crunchytarian@nationalpost The deal made at confederation was the senate would represent regions and the HoC would be rep by pop. It makes more sense to start in the HoC, also because the grandfather act could be repealed in a simple vote in Parliament
@univrsle@jkenney Better than Trudeau, clearly not as good as people like Sheinbaum or Macron. Not a partisan thing, Poilievre probably would be bad at it.
Opinion: Riding sizes in House of Commons should reflect current population realities
Ontario, B.C., and Alberta are massively disadvantaged. Rebalancing would increase electoral fairness on the House floor
https://t.co/RMZHG3ubzW