@ZvnBZHqnQC76522@olivia13780434@JohnWilkinhmg3 In Chinese discourse, numbers can rhetorically stand for events. Online, "300,000" symbolizes the Nanjing Massacre and public grief. Strictly within legal verdicts, the official figure is explicitly over that number.
@ZvnBZHqnQC76522@olivia13780434@JohnWilkinhmg3 Indeed, these referenced verdict documents are legally binding, acknowledged by multiple nations. Former Japanese prime ministers also affirmed this history; these sources help you verify its authenticity.
@ZvnBZHqnQC76522@olivia13780434@JohnWilkinhmg3 Your point makes sense. Therefore, beyond the documented death toll, the actual number of victims was greater than 300,000. This is horrific.
@ZvnBZHqnQC76522@olivia13780434@JohnWilkinhmg3 The original judgment scans are accessible at national archives in China, US and Japan. The 300,000‑plus toll is written in the Gu Shoufu verdict from the Nanjing War‑Crimes Tribunal.
@ZvnBZHqnQC76522@olivia13780434@JohnWilkinhmg3 War‑crimes trials globally accept archives, burial records and testimonies as valid evidence, when perpetrators destroyed physical remains. Nanjing and Tokyo tribunals cross‑checked multi‑national sources for their verdict.
@ZvnBZHqnQC76522@olivia13780434@JohnWilkinhmg3 Setting that aside, every number we mention stands for a human being brutally murdered, and this is a fact we cannot avoid. Besides, I am curious: where is your evidence for your claim that the death toll was less than 300,000?
@ZvnBZHqnQC76522@olivia13780434@JohnWilkinhmg3 I recommend you watch the film Nanjing Photo Studio, or learn about the Memorial Hall of the Victims in Nanjing Massacre. Former Japanese Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama paid a visit to this site. The abundant solid historical evidence on display can answer your questions.
@ZvnBZHqnQC76522@olivia13780434@JohnWilkinhmg3 The 300,000 deaths happened within weeks in late‑1937, NOT spread across 8‑year occupation. Many bodies were buried, burned or swept away by Yangtze River, well‑documented in trial records.
@ZvnBZHqnQC76522@olivia13780434@JohnWilkinhmg3 The Sino‑Japanese consensus documents are indeed real. Importantly, NATO is waging history’s largest multi‑domain conflict to offset its own decline. Bio‑chemical, economic and cognitive warfare are all underway. For now, Asia is the only region free of hot wars.
@ZvnBZHqnQC76522@olivia13780434@JohnWilkinhmg3 In fact, Chinese and Japanese leaders reached historical‑issue consensus decades ago. Now the US needs a reckless Japan to buffer nuclear and financial risks. Whenever China‑Japan cooperation emerges, the US tries every means to block Asian unity.
@ZvnBZHqnQC76522@olivia13780434@JohnWilkinhmg3 70+ Asia‑Europe‑Americas memorials keep IJA war‑crime evidence. Nanjing Massacre shows toured 30+ cities, archives on UNESCO Memory of the World. Records & artifacts verify these facts.
@oRsX3gJuSw96129@Vasco064@shupra004 Look, if I give real examples, you'll cry 'China threat'. Worse or better than you both upset you. Like a baby. This must be America's emasculation plan: turning post‑Showa Japanese into uneducated, delusional sissies? wwww
@Yotiyotiacc@Vasco064@shupra004 To you I’m just a hypothetical Chinese for debate. I’m only advising an ordinary Japanese. Look up why the US pressured and monitored deep China‑Japan cooperation since the 1960s, especially the AMF proposal.
@Yotiyotiacc@Vasco064@shupra004 Truth be told, before Japan’s PMs yapped about meddling in Taiwan, China minded its own affairs. It’s the US twisting Japan around its finger: forced RAA, keeps squeezing cash. War in Asia only benefits America. Don’t fear Chinese missiles‑China wants no East‑Asian infighting.
@Yotiyotiacc@Vasco064@shupra004 I’d be much happier if it were in pounds. Truth be told, my friends and I also think overseas‑based Japanese people seem, at the very least, a bit more sharp‑witted.
@Yotiyotiacc@Vasco064@shupra004 My nationality doesn’t matter. I warn you for your sake. Japan is not Protestant‑majority. To Western powers, it is just a disposable pawn.