@spamspam111113@Aidante42@lord_scruff@DougTenNapel What does that have to do with the topic of real, human art? You go off on such tangents just to try and connect your opinion while invalidating art by literally comparing it to the Holocaust. With that level of argumentation, I'm not surprised because you autogenerate with AI.
@MewtAesthetics@projektXI01@ToshiArte 4- With the zero value of texting a request to have an auto-generated image or video and feeling immediate satisfaction from believing that you did it yourself, that it was the result you wanted and to convince yourself that you are also an artist without fair competition.
@MewtAesthetics@projektXI01@ToshiArte 1- How do you precisely recreate the diverse conditions to produce the functions of a camera? The camera was a black box that exposed a lens to light; each improvement controlled levels of visual precision. You don't just press a button; it's impossible to create...
@MewtAesthetics@projektXI01@ToshiArte 3- Not only that, but you also use unrealistic examples with false equivalence fallacies to defend synthetic and automated products, and you believe that the same value exists in the brain's process of Mastering formats, intentionally adjusting, and creating art real...
@MewtAesthetics@projektXI01@ToshiArte 2- A photographic result obtained through handcrafted means, painting, 3D environments, etc., are not faithful reproductions because the medium limits the characteristics of a photo or video. You not only know nothing about the history of multimedia...
@InterspeciesFa1@wiretransfer@elbuffaloart The worst part is that it's true. Personally, I believe there's a differentiating factor: Human transformative use IS VALID because the chosen material is calibrated through sensitivity and authorial meaning. The AI only selects by approximation to make you think it was your idea
@AstuarteVT@BASSSLAPPING@elbuffaloart Unfortunately, they cannot be blamed for pointing out the possible use of generative content; with its rapid evolution, the details they described will be seen tomorrow in any artistic AI. A sad, irreversible digital paranoia because it is capable of self-improvement.
@exillvs@elbuffaloart AI cannot function without databases, which are full of material from artists without their authorization. Then it grants a product that evades copyright and thus survives without being legally regulated. Its synthetic process is a legal loophole for stealing without a trace.
@lyghtmare@elbuffaloart It is the most cynical and hypocritical justification I have ever read for the artistic use of artificial intelligence.
A result is not only valuable for its aesthetics; the time spent creating it, life experiences, and the reasons for the influences add value. AI is an smoothie.
@cxsmicverge I think that this user should not be given more relevance, he is completely the archetype of someone who, running out of arguments, becomes disrespectful, falling into his own moral compass.
Whether or not he's Latino doesn't take away from how unpleasant he is as a person.