@ElectronicStar7@loreific Kidnapping is when someone breaks into YOUR home and drags you away, not when YOU sneak into someone else's territory and get caught. How old are you, for real?
Một người đàn ông pha cocktail cho một cô gái thì có cái đéo gì trông nguy hiểm? Nhưng một thằng đầu đường xó chợ đột nhiên nhảy vào nhà từ ban công thì có đấy. Đéo thể tin được có ngày một con akgae Sylus như tôi phải nói điều này. Thật vãi lồn.
See, René—Can I call you René? I don't typically do this, because it takes away from the hilarity of it all, and I typically like to just have people sit with it, but just for you, I will explain:
The joke was making fun of people who were incorrectly jumping to conclusions about a character in a game called Love and Deepspace.
You're familiar with that game, right?
The character's name is Valko and when his PV's were dropped, certain groups of people decided to fling very serious accusations at him, claiming he was "a danger to women," and even going as far as calling him a "rapist", despite not having the full context of the actual story or cards that the clips were pulled from (which showed zero aggression on his part, by the way, but I digress).
Now the other day, Love and Deepspace released a PV of *another* character's—Rafayel—new Solo which features him making alcoholic beverages, feeding them to the main character—a woman—and then coming onto her. In these PVs, there is neither verbal consent given or insinuated, you see. So in applying the same logic to THIS PV as the first group of people did to Valko's PV: It is easily perceived that Rafayel is ALSO a danger to women, as it would seem he has no problem getting them drunk and then taking advantage of them.
Now the tells the the post I made about it was sarcasm, a parody—a joke if you will—were such lines that I used like: (in all caps) "This is such an unsafe environment for women," referencing the first groups' cries of "danger" over yet another fictional character; and "In my fictional otome game?! I think not," which sarcastically signals that none of this is real, and it is just a game, and therefore doesn't actually matter; and lastly finished off with the very parody-driven hashtag: #LADSRafayelCancelled
Now, if you are not at all USED to things like humor, sarcasm, parody, and fiction, I can understand where you may have gotten confused. Maybe even a little bit concerned.
That's okay.
These are all concepts we learn as we grow up, which I assume you are not finished doing yet. So, you know. Learning opportunity for you. (Yay!)
What I do find curious however, is that by your own admission, ("After reading this card...") you discovered that Rafayel does in fact check for consent and is not ACTUALLY a danger to women, as the very sexy-focused PV would have one perceive, due to the omission of that very line of consent, which I assume was due to pacing and like... you know... keeping things sexy.
And yet... you now use phrases like, "deep down they wish my fishie were a rapist" (that's certainly an odd sentence for someone mentally stable to write out, but you know... I'm old. Maybe it's the culture of the kids these days, I dunno...), "[...] a rapist like their filthy mutt."
At which point I would like to ask: Can I borrow your account login?
You've clearly been able to read Valko's cards and gotten official, in-game confirmation that he is indeed a filthy mutt rapist, because you would obviously never say such things before receiving official in-game confirmation via reading his story/cards, much like you did with Rafayel's. I unfortunately didn't get the same early in-game access pushed to my account as you did and I would very much love to read his story!
Thanks!
@loreific Oh speaking about WILLING. How about the safe word? Didn't MC willing to stop by saying 3 times the s-word? But did the stray dog listen? I see. I see.
Wait— when V was being bashed when people found one of his alleged four stars containing him possibly being coercive, ignoring safe words, and killing a father in front of his son it’s not true because it’s posted on Ao3 but now that the same Ao3 author is saying valko was the original 5th her words now have legitimacy? 😟❓
You do realize you can’t just believe one and not the other right when it was the same source? Idk, if it was me rather just deny everything; that he was the fifth and was shelved twice so that i can also deny was capable of being coercive with intimacy 😬
That's a completely different situation from a girl minding her own business at home when some random street thug dickhead breaks in through her balcony.
@6orZero Tồn tại bằng cách lôi chúng mày ra để tạo tiếng cười mua vui cho og5 chứ gì nữa. Sự đau khổ của ♻️ là quà khuyến mại của bọn tao. Hãy chấp nhận trở thành trò hề đính kèm cho mỗi dịp banner đi 🤡 Chúng mày mà chết hết thì chán lắm đó.
After reading this card, I’m sorry for disappointing you. I hope you'll sober up after drinking dog piss every night to cope with your grief over valko’s death
@Arty_BTS@BeepBoo88437902 Are you fucking stupid, or did you leave your brain in your mother's womb when you were born? Those ♻️ freaks went as far as digging up personal information about YRH's family and children, as well as Infold employees. If you don't know shit about what happened, shut up whore.
Those self-proclaimed Sylus fans who mock him just to defend an ugly 8 days old pixel, then call others delusional for simply having their own opinions about the game. As if they weren't the ones fantasizing about that ugly-ass becoming the most successful ML if he'd debuted.