The league is here.
Welcome to the Premier Trading League - where futures traders compete for their place at the top.
$1M on the line.
Free to enter.
One champion.
Bigger stakes. Bigger stage. A league of its own.
This is PTL.
@ChristianFECEO@Futureselitecom But you already know that.
That’s exactly why this requirement makes your “pass in 2 days” advertising look misleading. You advertise a 2-day pass, while requiring penny-perfect consistency that real market execution can make impossible to achieve.
🚨 @Futureselitecom — can you explain this publicly?
Your support says I need 100% consistency to pass.
Your own dashboard shows:
$3,006 out of $3,006
99.99% achieved
You also advertise that your Nitro evaluation can be passed in a minimum of 2 trading days.
So how exactly is a trader supposed to achieve 100.00% when even $3,006 / $3,006 is displayed as 99.99%?
@ChristianFECEO@PropFirmMatch@pfm_futures — would genuinely like your take on this.
Screenshots attached. Traders should see exactly how this rule is being calculated.
Then prove it.
I want to see the CEO of @Futureselitecom personally pass the account in 2 days and hit the consistency target EXACTLY to the penny.
No backend adjustment. No exception.
Same rules customers get.
Show us how it’s done.
I use Tradovate TP brackets and yet it's still impossible to hit it to the penny due to slippage.
🚨 THIS is the problem with @Futureselitecom that people are missing.
The issue is NOT simply that they have a 50% consistency rule.
Other futures prop firms understand that consistency calculations involve cents and rounding, so they give traders some wiggle room / tolerance around the threshold.
FuturesElite apparently wants the consistency requirement to hit EXACTLY 100.00%.
Look at my dashboard:
$3,006 out of $3,006
Yet somehow:
99.99% ACHIEVED.
🤡🤡🤡
I literally reached the amount THEIR OWN DASHBOARD says is required, and support still tells me:
“your consistency need to be 100% sir.”
So a hidden fraction of a dollar / rounding difference can apparently decide whether you pass or fail.
This is exactly WHY other prop firms use a small buffer instead of forcing traders to chase an absurd 100.00% calculation down to the cent.
And this is marketed as something you can pass in 2 trading days?
@Futureselitecom@ChristianFECEO@PropFirmMatch@pfm_futures
Show us another major futures prop firm that handles a 50% consistency threshold this way.
And explain publicly how:
$3,006 / $3,006 = 99.99%.
Traders deserve to know about this BEFORE paying.
This is the other account:
✅ Profit target: $3,009 / $3,000 — 100.31%
✅ Trading days: 2 / 2 — 100%
❌ Consistency: $3,009 / $3,013 — 99.87%
Support response: “your consistency need to be 100% sir.”
@Futureselitecom@ChristianFECEO
Please provide the exact formula required to reach 100.00%.
If it is achievable, show the math publicly.
The bigger issue is transparency.
If you market an evaluation as passable in 2 days, but then require an exact 100.00% consistency calculation — while the platform itself can display $3,006 / $3,006 as 99.99% — traders deserve to know that BEFORE paying.
This is not a minor rounding issue when it determines whether someone passes or fails.