@ChrisHumble79@MattTakeThree Reporting a crime and/or someone nearly killing you, regardless of it’s a mistake, is perfectly acceptable in my eyes. Too many cunts using the roads and threatening the safety of others. 2 brothers under 10 dead by me last week cos of a pissed up driver.
@adeburton@nessimmersion@MyCameraSaw Don’t waste your time debating with that account, it’s either a robot or very strange person that can only respond in riddles
@nessimmersion@PDogTricks@MyCameraSaw You’ve taken a post about someone rightly reporting dangerous and illegal behaviour, and are pompously asking questions about the economic impact of the victim without actually stating anything in your posts. Lonely cunt
@nessimmersion@PDogTricks@MyCameraSaw Hmm let’s have a think about the negative externalities of driving a car v riding a bike… I don’t think you thought that one through very well did you
@boots_bike It’s not an us v them argument even though most think it is. Everyone should abide by the rules of the road regardless of mode of transport. The issue is that when car drivers don’t, the impact is far higher.
I cycled over 3500 miles last year for context
@RealismHelps@londoncabbie1 Fucking hate this argument, just cos you’re doing a job doesn’t mean you get to break the law and inconvenience people. Same argument delivery drivers use when they speed down tight country lanes and nearly kill you
A Moroccan man who arrives in Britain via small boat and claims asylum will be given taxpayer funded accommodation, taxpayer funded food, and taxpayer funded spending money. Under this plan, he will be asked to repay a very small fraction of that taxpayer funded largesse, capped at £10k, if he finds work.
A British student who works hard and wins a place at a top-tier university will leave with £47,900 in debt, appreciating at a 6.2% interest rate. Once he starts work, he will pay this loan plus taxes to fund the welfare given to the Moroccan asylum seeker.
This is a grossly unfair system.
@IsSaddleThereIs@A1an_M@Adespoto3 You’ve made the error of assuming people like him can approach problems logically. They don’t have the mental capacity to look at statistics and reach a conclusion - they simply parrot what they’ve heard others say