@LucShanaha24000 @TitleTownTalks The snaps comment was a generalization over his career because it was the same the 2 (healthy) seasons prior too. KE has consistently been the lower performing of the two and has gotten the majority of snaps over LVN. It’s trash coaching.
@PackersNotes IMO it’s 3 things: Depth, ST and coaching.
GB is notorious for not having good depth. One injury at far too many positions on this team make that position go from good (v.good) to poor
ST: self explanatory
Coaching: isn’t good enough (at all levels) to overcome the top two.
@Skotzk07 @PackersNotes This is really it too. True contenders need to be good to great at 2 (if not all 3) phases. The Rams ST wasn’t great but it was w/o question better than GBs
@bcarli07@KenIngalls For the sake of the team’s success I hope he does too. But he was a guy in LV who couldn’t stay healthy and graded out fairly meh over his 4 years there. I wasn’t a fan of his signing for day 1.
@TavernWISports Agree. Ortiz has a good glove but he is a huge liability at the plate and unless Hall dials in this season. all signs are pointing to him being a mediocre pitcher at best.
@JJLahey Ppl only want Harris because of his success on the field in GB. But in regards to coaching he’s once of the least promising candidates for DC.
@PackersNotes My only counter argument is SFs window is closing and fast compared to GBs. Their overall roster is getting older and their large contracts are also quickly becoming an issue. Maybe that’s the selling point. But HC vs HC…it’s KS.
@BruceIronsNFL Obviously rosters given play a part to their history. But all we fans really have to go off of is their coaching history, successful or not.
@PackersNotes The chance they return is far higher than them getting fired at this point. They will keep them in place for 2 seasons too long. It’s the Packer way.