@greyknight7@Martyupnorth 'He has eyes you bellend'. Yeah bud. If thst's the case then those eyes are connected to a dysfunctional brain. And for you, go find something to do with your life. Like maybe touch books?
@jwilliamkeech@Martyupnorth There is an estimated 3000 officers shortfall. And for the actual policing, the recruitment process is open to all. And no, what you want are competent police officers. Pink, blue, black, white, brown. Whatever colour!
@curious_edline The whole point of the matter was to shed light on reasons why it has a superior valuation than its competitors. None of us here make the rules. Only explaining the logic. Whether you think it is wrong or right, the logic behind stands.
Agreed. But that is not the only thing I mentioned though. I mentioned energy and services too in that mix. And even that is not an exhaustive list of what affects these valuations. Tesla is priced as a technology/AI/robotics platform company with cars as the current core, while BYD is valued more like a high-volume, vertically integrated automaker/battery manufacturer.
@curious_edline Not to bash you but haa dig deeper. Amongst other things, Tesla is vertically intergrated for what they use to manufacture their products and also sells directly to the consumer via showrooms that they own. Zvakatosiyana nemaitiro eToyota. Kwozoti solar, services.
@david_parker The David and Goliath story was a prophecy of how One Man's victory would become a victory for all His people and how He totally decimated the giant that is sin. It is not a story to boost individuals' morales. The stories of the Bible point to one name, Jesus Christ.
@curious_edline About this, don't mention "consensus" and expect to get away with it ๐
There are so many Bible scholars as you know already - some very atheist. In any event, tipe timbovheneka source rako so we can properly fact check.
@curious_edline Oh well. Thing is when you misunderstand the foundation of wht a Bible passage is aiming at, the whole interpretation falls apart. In this case, your secular exegesis is inadvertently creating a straw man and arriving at a distorted conclusion. Fair though but very inaccurate.