@ClubWPTGold man your site is absolutely a mockery. The amount of nonsense hands I run into everyday and just constantly get out handed over and over. How is this legal. Your site is absolute theft.
@AskPS_ANZ This update locked up my Playstation. I am stuck on an error SU-30746-0 message and I have tried all options to restart except initialize. I don't want to lose all my save progress. What is going on?
Wanted to post this here in case anyone wishes to help. A former coworker of mine just suffered a terrible loss and is in a bind. Thanks in advance to anyone that can help
https://t.co/Mcl4XN3XHR
@TotesMcGoatsMTG @JimTSF As for mistake as a card.. I don't think there is a thing wrong with controlling the amount of mana used in a game. People trying to win a game shouldn't just be given the freedom to cast every spell they want. It is why counterspells are also a thing.
@TotesMcGoatsMTG @JimTSF I am not saying cry more loser. I am only using the word cry as a replacement for complaining. As for it being a mistake that is debatable for what kind. They are trying to sell a game and it is obvious their is a stigma with these cards so they don't print what won't sell.
@TotesMcGoatsMTG @JimTSF Honestly people need to get over their hatred for LD. It is part of the game and people crying about how it isn't fun makes no sense when they also cry about losing in general. (not you just most players I interact with) I welcome these cards and wish other people did too.
@GumballsOhYeah @AndrewMGill @listenerelf It is the difference between the card effect saying "xyz" is also an artifact token as opposed to it becoming and artifact token. It is only an artifact token because of the continuous card effect. Without the continuous effect it is not an artifact token.
@AndrewMGill @listenerelf That may be correct. Either way I am going to relent.
I just wanted to make a Katamari Damacy joke. Not debate if an UnCard would work in a practical Magic game.
@AndrewMGill @listenerelf That being said the card granting that effect also doesn't state that the counter becomes a permanent. Which is why I like the silly un answer better.
@AndrewMGill @listenerelf This is a special Un, case though. It is not naturally a permanent. It is a +1/+1 counter that only has its status as an Artifact due to the ability of another card granting it.
@listenerelf I like the idea of the counters staying on the creature while still equipping to another causing the creature to be a Katamari Damacy magic monstrosity which I think @GavinVerhey would appreciate ๐