@HollyHearte How’d you even know it’s the gum that makes you stupid AND stacked Nate as of just the gum that makes you stacked? How’d you of all people even tell the difference?
@HollyHearte The size of her tits is alright. Fine, really. Okay, maybe a little on the smaller end, but I wouldn’t want her to feel self conscious for being a flatso. Especially as they’re the only thing about her that has any value. Because that’d make her worthless trash…
@Lumidoom So we have exactly one race that sometimes doesn't use pants. But normally does. That's the problem, it's too much work. ...though succubi won't ever be playable for a very different reason. They're succubi and the game is rated T for Teens.
@jahabdank@MehEAG@chesscom Yes, and as I re-iterated over and over again, it is not a primitive war game. It has a very specific goal in its game design, and it accomplishes that goal. Wanting more from it is like wanting interstellar logistics simulation in starcraft 2. It's not that kind of game.
@jahabdank@MehEAG@chesscom Sure, but that’s how it is now. And it accomplishes its purpose perfectly as is. There is no need to change anything when it already does the thing it wants to do. It would just be change for change’s sake. It’s perfectly balanced, why ruin that balance?
@jahabdank@MehEAG@chesscom Because the limit on your options is part of the appeal. There are 16 pieces, in 6 different variations. A child can pick up the rules in half an hour. You and your enemy are perfectly matched in material. Now go and outsmart them with your limited arsenal.
@jahabdank@MehEAG@chesscom But I already told you, it being a war game is irrelevant to what it tries to do. Like adding interplanetary logistic chains to StarCraft 2. It’s missing the point.
Chess is a game about pure tactics. You have limited options and perfect knowledge. Now win.
@jahabdank@MehEAG@chesscom It's a skin. A flavor. Like you can flavor Go to be about the army of skittles fighting the M&Mpire, if you want to. That doesn't make Go a wargame. But sure, let's call chess a wargame then. I don't know what that label has to do with anything to begin with. It's pure tactics.
@jahabdank@MehEAG@chesscom It's a game. It's about pitting your intellect against that of another person. That's the point. Not to have the horse bit model how cavalry jumps over the first line of infantry or whatever. It's not meant to teach you about how to run a real army.
@jahabdank@MehEAG@chesscom Look up the history of chess pieces and their names, man. The “wargame skin” is a relatively recent invention.
It’s a game of pure tactics. You and your enemy both have perfect knowledge of the field. No RNG. The only thing that matters is who is the better tactician.
@jahabdank@MehEAG@chesscom No. Jumping cavalry into infantry formations was never an actual strategy. Because that has a high chance to kill the horse and even if it survives leaves the cavalry stuck inside an infantry formation where their main advantage, speed, is gone. It’s stupid. Never done.
@CCreations69@4gottnHistory What is “everything else”!? Their big library got burnt down every couple hundred years, that’s where their equivalent of blueprints would’ve been kept. What we know of them is mostly inscriptions in their monuments, and why would you inscribe a blueprint into a building.