@uncertainhum0r The way I understood it is that It's about modesty and her excitement to take a picture with a degenerate who promotes filth. It's unfitting for her to do that since she's wearing a hijab which is a symbol of our religion. No Muslim (man/woman) should look up to these people
@VelvetGrumps Can you read or are you just dishonest? Your hate has made you blind and retarded because normal people read things SEQUENTIALLY. In sequence. Meaning in order. Does the concept of reading make sense to you?
@MLSA182177203 The ayah literally agrees with me, Allah causes hearing. If you say that Allah can cause the dead to hear, then they are able to make dua to Allah, which means there's no shirk. Shirk is when someone make similarities between Allah in his essence, attributes and actions
@MLSA182177203 As for the Prophet ﷺ, Allah is please with him and he is a means towards Allah just like how food is a means for nourishment while Allah has the power to sustain us without it. Allah is the only cause
@Vakken1 The wisdom of the multiplication of deeds is for the Muslims to understand the honour of those places and to be more attached to them
God gives opportunities to whomever he wills. But sincerity is all that matters to God
@Vakken1 The more good deeds, you have the greater the grace of God
God only cares about works done with effort and sincerity towards him. If you simply do the work but lack them, those deeds would be worthless
Here God speaks against those who pray (good) but lack sincerity (bad)
@Vakken1 Your merits are a reflection of your inner state. So that God's grace inclines towards us. If we were judged purely based on merit, none of us would be in paradise. Committing sins and saying God would have to forgive is an insult no matter whether its said directly or not
@nightwing0530 Both moral and amoral actions are uncategorically scoped under evolution. It explains how living things change. It has no concern about morality. So you can't derive normative values from it. It somewhat explains how we're capable of these moral actions not which is right
@nightwing0530 Interesting reply given that you've admitted that under different conditions, we'd have different moral values in another evolutionary timeline. So eating babies is possibly moral according to you. It's also worth noting that infanticide is somewhat common in the animal kingdom
@nightwing0530 Did evolution take a break while that's happening? Knowing what evolution is, you can never be sure if you even have the right moral values. I still do not think materialism can adequately explain morality
@nightwing0530 This implies that if we evolved differently we would have different moral values. You seem to suggest that evolution guides morality and it steers us towards what's "good". If that's the case then why is rape rampant in the animal kingdom? Why do humans do amoral actions?...
In Islam if you rape and eat children you get executed, while in the West if you rape and eat children you get voted president or a high ranking government official. We are not the same
@Vhoyde The mind is ontologically prior. Therefore, it's reasonable to think that time is linear. Thinking that the mind is unreliable is pretty extreme. Otherwise, why not doubt all your thoughts, empirical findings and existence all together? But that's self refuting