I have a question: why aren't all the COVID-19 Vaccine addicts on their 10th booster shot already?
"Research" shows COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines:
1. Treat cancer
2. Lower risk of cardiovascular disease by 40%
3. Lower risk of erectile dysfunction
4. Save your marriage
5. Improve your driving 😂
So why did all the vaccine addicts stop taking them after 2 or 3 jabs, if the Pfizer and Moderna have such incredible health benefits? 🥴
Recordemos que los muchachos de Vox se subieron al carro de la Plandemia como todo quisqui, y que en sus filas militaba el matasanos aquel que nos quería emponzoñar a toda costa.
DESPUES DE DECADAS INVESTIGANDO.
NO SABEMOS PORQUE VIENE EL https://t.co/QJ2Q3jdpBa verdad.
NO tienen puta idea la gran mayoría....
MENTES QUE SE SUPONEN GENIALES...Engañados infantilmente.
Miles de millones gastados para que den vueltas...
-- El demonio se viste de Prada--
🚨 THE REAL REASON THEY BANNED RAW MILK ISN'T BACTERIA. IT'S BECAUSE IT HEALS.
Raw milk was consumed by every human civilization for 10,000 years. No pasteurization. No processing. No regulation. The foundation of human nutrition across every continent. Then in 1987 — the FDA made interstate sale of raw milk illegal.
10,000 years of safe consumption. Then suddenly "dangerous." Not because anything changed about milk. Because something changed about what they needed you to not have access to.
⟁
Raw milk contains over 60 functional enzymes — destroyed by pasteurization. Lactoperoxidase — a natural antibiotic that kills pathogens without killing beneficial bacteria. Lipase — an enzyme that allows complete fat digestion and nutrient absorption. Phosphatase — required for calcium absorption into bone.
Pasteurized milk contains zero active enzymes. The calcium in pasteurized milk is largely unabsorbable without phosphatase. You drink it for "strong bones" — but your body can't use the calcium without the enzyme that was cooked out of it. The "health food" is nutritionally crippled by the process they told you makes it "safe."
⟁
Raw milk contains immunoglobulins — antibodies that program your immune system. Children raised on raw milk show 50% lower rates of asthma, 40% lower rates of allergies, and 60% lower rates of ear infections compared to pasteurized milk consumers. Published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Peer-reviewed. Replicated.
The immune programming in raw milk teaches your body to distinguish between real threats and harmless substances. Without it — the immune system misfires. Attacks pollen. Attacks food proteins. Attacks itself. The autoimmune epidemic began exactly when raw milk disappeared from the food supply.
⟁
Lactoferrin — present in raw milk, destroyed by pasteurization — is one of the most potent anti-cancer compounds found in nature. It binds to iron — which cancer cells require at 10-15x the rate of normal cells — and starves tumors of their primary growth fuel. Published in dozens of studies. Never mentioned by oncologists.
Raw milk also contains conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) at levels 500% higher than pasteurized. CLA — documented in over 30 studies to inhibit tumor growth, reduce body fat, and improve insulin sensitivity. Heat processing destroys it.
They didn't pasteurize milk to protect you from bacteria. They pasteurize it to protect their industries from a food that prevents the diseases they profit from treating.
⟁
The "danger" of raw milk: the CDC reports 1,606 illnesses from raw milk between 1993 and 2012. In 19 years. In a country of 330 million people. That's 84 illnesses per year. From a food consumed by 10 million Americans.
Pasteurized milk causes 412 hospitalizations per year from Listeria alone. The "safe" version hospitalizes 5x more people than the "dangerous" version sickens.
The ban was never about safety. It was about control. Control of your immune system. Control of your health. Control of a food that makes pharmaceutical intervention unnecessary for the majority of common diseases.
22 states now allow raw milk sales. The ban is crumbling. Because the people who drink it don't get sick. And the people who don't — fill waiting rooms.
CODE: 60-ENZYMES / LACTOFERRIN / 10000-YEARS / BAN-CRUMBLING
They banned a food humans thrived on for 10,000 years — and replaced it with a dead version that makes you sick enough to need their drugs.
♟
10,000 years of safe consumption. Then banned. Not because it's dangerous — because it works too well.
#smacznego
McDonald's przegrywa proces przeciwko szefowi kuchni Jamiemu Oliverowi, który udowodnił, że żywność, którą sprzedają, nie nadaje się do spożycia przez ludzi, ponieważ jest wysoce toksyczna.
To było jakieś osiem lat temu... ale nikogo to nie obchodziło... Szef kuchni Jamie Oliver wygrał proces z największą na świecie siecią restauracji typu fast-food.
Oliver pokazuje, jak powstają hamburgery.
Według Olivera, tłuste kawałki mięsa są „myte” wodorem amoniaku, a następnie wykorzystywane do wypełniania hamburgerów w owijkach na kotlety. Prezenter telewizyjny twierdzi, że już przed tym procesem mięso to nie nadawało się do spożycia przez ludzi.
Oliver, radykalny szef kuchni i aktywista, który stawia czoła przemysłowi spożywczemu, mówi:
„Mówimy o mięsie sprzedawanym jako karma dla psów, a następnie podawanym ludziom. Oprócz negatywnego wpływu na jakość mięsa, kwas amonowy jest szkodliwy dla zdrowia”. Oliver nazywa to „procesem różowego tuczenia”.
Która zdrowa na umyśle osoba włożyłaby dziecku do ust kawałek mięsa nasączony amoniakiem wodorowym?
W innym przedsięwzięciu Oliver zademonstrował, jak powstają nuggetsy z kurczaka: po wybraniu „najlepszych części”, reszta – tłuszcz, skóra, chrząstki, oczy, kości, głowa, stopy – jest poddawana działaniu mieszanki Mec-Split zwanej Canica – eufemizmem używanym przez inżynierów żywności. Ta krwistoróżowa pasta, która jest dezodoryzowana, wybielana, odświeżana i ponownie barwiona, jest następnie obtaczana w mące i smażona w głębokim tłuszczu. Pozostaje w zazwyczaj częściowo uwodornionych olejach, innymi słowy, w substancjach toksycznych.
Przemysł spożywczy wykorzystuje wodór amonowy jako środek antybakteryjny, co pozwala McDonald's na stosowanie w hamburgerach mięsa nienadającego się do spożycia przez ludzi.
Jeszcze bardziej alarmujący jest jednak fakt, że substancje na bazie wodoru amonowego są uznawane za „legalne składniki procesu produkcyjnego” w przemyśle spożywczym na całym świecie, za zgodą organów ochrony zdrowia. Konsumenci nigdy nie dowiedzą się zatem, jakie substancje znajdują się w ich żywności.
https://t.co/qZfp4TetNu
La firmante de esta carta sobre los robos que publicó ayer @LaVanguardia es mi madre. Hace unos días fui a comer con ella y con una amiga de su edad. A su amiga se le había sentado al lado una chica rubia en esos jardines. Le dijo que la conocía del barrio y que estaba embarazada. Le cogió la mano y se la puso en su barriga. Cuando acabamos la comida, la amiga de mi madre se dio cuenta que le faltaba el reloj. Se lo había robado la chica rubia "embarazada". Dos días después mi hermana le contó a mi madre que a una amiga de su suegra le había pasado lo mismo con un collar que llevaba puesto. La misma chica se le acercó en la misma zona y sin darse cuento le quitó el collar. Esta semana, por la mañana, en la calle, en el mismo barrio, sin nadie alrededor, una chica rubia se puso al lado de mi madre en un semáforo y le dio conversación. Le dijo que estaba embarazada de dos meses y que iba al médico. A mi madre le saltaron las alertas. Tiene 91 años pero su cabeza funciona perfectamente. Llevaba puesto un colgante que le regalé yo. Le preguntó a la chica de donde era y le dijo que ucraniana, aunque hablaba un español perfecto. Ella le puso la mano en el hombre y mi madre reaccionó dándole un codazo. Ella cambió el rostro de repente, pero se fue rápidamente de allí. Mi madre volvió a casa asustada y por la tarde redactó la carta. Tres veces (al menos) en una semana en la misma zona. Podemos pedir al @ajuntament_bcn_ y als @mossos más seguridad en el barrio para la gente mayor. Se busca chica rubia, con ojos azules, que dice ser ucraniana y que está embarazada. Es una profesional del hurto sigiloso.
The year is 1949.
The Nobel Prize in Medicine has just gone to the man who invented the lobotomy. Your doctor suggests one for your sister, who has not been herself since the baby came. It is the most celebrated advance in psychiatry of the age, and he is simply current. By the time the prize curdles into an embarrassment, close to twenty thousand Americans have had the operation, and proportionally more here in Britain.
The year is 1956.
Lay the baby down on his front, the doctor says. So does the most trusted childcare book ever written, the one on every new mother's shelf. On his back he might choke, the reasoning goes. Millions obey. The advice holds for nearly thirty years, long after the evidence has quietly turned, and a generation of cot deaths is counted before anyone thinks to roll the babies over.
The year is 1966.
A bestselling book informs your wife that menopause is a disease, that she is, in the author's word, a castrate, and that a small daily pill will keep her youthful and tolerable to live with. Her doctor agrees. The drug becomes one of the most prescribed in the country. Nobody mentions that the author sat on the payroll of the company that made it. That detail surfaces decades later, in the same year the landmark trial is halted early for raising rates of breast cancer, stroke and clots.
The year is 1979.
Your ulcer is caused by stress and sharp food, the doctor explains. Calm down, drink milk, take the antacid that happens to be the best-selling medicine on earth. Two Australians are about to prove that most ulcers are caused by a bacterium and cured by a fortnight of antibiotics. The profession laughs. One of them eventually drinks a beaker of the stuff to settle the matter. The establishment takes the better part of twenty years to stop laughing. The Nobel lands in 2005.
The year is 1985.
Butter is dangerous, the doctor says. Switch to margarine, it is modern, it is heart-healthy, the experts are united. The spread he nudges you toward is loaded with trans fats, which the next decade will identify as the genuinely dangerous one, and which will eventually be banned outright. The butter goes quietly back in the fridge. No correction is ever printed at the volume of the original warning.
The year is 1992.
There is a pyramid on the surgery wall, and the very same one in your grandchild's classroom. Bread, cereal, rice and pasta form the broad virtuous base, up to eleven servings a day. Fat is exiled to the tiny tip. The chart was reportedly held back a year while the relevant industries had their say. It is wrong at the bottom and wrong at the top.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines, new studies, a fresh consensus, delivered with precisely the steady confidence of every guideline above. He believes it, and he has good reason to. So did every doctor in this thread. None of them were villains. Each was sincere, most were kind, and all were certain, reading from a map that somebody else had drawn and handed them. That is the part worth sitting with.
So when the man in the white coat tells you what to eat, what to fear, and what to swallow every morning for the rest of your life, you are allowed to ask. Who paid for the study. What the evidence says beneath the headline. What he was just as certain about thirty years ago, and where that advice sits now.
Then make up your own mind. Call it scepticism, or call it whatever your grandmother called it when she ignored the advert, kept the butter where it was, and lived to ninety-one.
It has outlasted every consensus on this list. It will outlast this one too.
Elections are rigged.
Doctors are dealers.
Astronauts are actors.
Children are trafficked.
Politicians are puppets.
Vaccines are poison.
Pandemics are planned.
Wars are manufactured.
9/11 was an inside job.
🔻 YOUR MICROWAVE OPERATES AT 2.45 GIGAHERTZ. IT WAS BUILT BY A WEAPONS CONTRACTOR. IT DESTROYS UP TO 97% OF THE PROTECTIVE COMPOUNDS IN YOUR FOOD. YOU USE IT 4 TIMES A DAY AND CALL IT CONVENIENCE.
In 1945, Raytheon engineer Percy Spencer was testing military radar equipment — magnetrons built to detect enemy aircraft — when he noticed the radiation melted a chocolate bar in his pocket. Raytheon patented the technology. They called it "Radarange." The same company that builds Tomahawk cruise missiles put a radar weapon in your kitchen and called it a cooking appliance.
2.45 GHz. The same frequency band as your WiFi router. Except this one operates at 1,000 watts — concentrated inside a metal box — pointed directly at what you're about to put in your body.
In 2003, a study published in the Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture found that microwaved broccoli lost 97% of its flavonoids, 74% of its sinapics, and 87% of its caffeoyl-quinic derivatives. Steaming the same broccoli: 11% loss. The microwave didn't cook your food. It gutted it.
A former food science researcher — 8 years at a federal nutrition laboratory:
"We completed comparative molecular analysis on 14 common vegetables in 2011. Microwave exposure at standard household wattage produced radiolytic compounds — molecular fragments that do not exist in nature. They are not listed on any nutritional database because they were never supposed to be in food. The mitigation recommendation was suppressed at the agency level. The official position remained: 'Microwaving is safe and preserves nutrients.' Our data showed the opposite. The briefing was archived under review code NL-2011-7734 and never revisited."
In 1991, a Swiss clinical study by Hans Hertel found that subjects who ate microwaved food showed significant changes in blood chemistry — decreased hemoglobin, altered HDL/LDL ratios, and elevated leukocyte counts consistent with early-stage pathological response. The Swiss courts issued a gag order. Hertel was silenced until 1998.
They irradiate your food at weapons-grade frequency. Strip 97% of what protects you. Create molecular compounds that don't exist in nature. And they told you it saves time.
Three extra minutes on a stovetop. That's what stands between you and actual nutrition. The microwave doesn't save you time. It costs you everything the food was supposed to give you.
CODE: RAYTHEON-1945-RADAR / 2.45GHZ-1000W / BROCCOLI-97PCT / NL-2011-7734 / HERTEL-1991-GAG
⟁
A weapons company put a radar in your kitchen. You thanked them for the convenience. Unplug it tonight. Share this.
¡ESCÁNDALO QUE LA CIENCIA OFICIAL QUIERE ENTERRAR!
Cuando termines de ver esta entrevista, te darás cuenta de lo escandalosa que sigue siendo la realidad actual.
El biólogo Alfredo Embid (ya fallecido), uno de los grandes guerreros contra la falsa ciencia, destapó sin piedad:
El SIDA no es causado por el virus VIH.
Una de las mayores mentiras médicas del siglo XX, fabricada para generar miedo, control y miles de millones en tratamientos eternos.
No fue un error. Fue un montaje.
Despierta.
Lo que te vendieron como ciencia… era puro negocio y manipulación.
Los "virus voladores" de la gripe desaparecieron durante dos años, hasta que de repente volvieron a aparecer los virus voladores de la Gripe.
VVGripe=VV COVID.
Sólo con esto se desmontaba la Plandemia.
Pero 2+2 fué igual a 5.
El panel de abejas aplaudía a las 8.
De locos
HDPS
Miles de personas en todo el mundo están creando una sociedad en paralelo...
Redescubriendo salud Redescubriendo historia
Redescubriendo agricultura
Etc...etc.
Exportando Moralidad y Amor.
-- De ellos será el mundo que viene--
Montagnier antes de su "muerte" lo intuyò.
❤️♥️❤️♥️❤️
Los cribados médicos, sean de cáncer de colon o cualquier otro, son una estafa con varias vertientes: 1) Por un lado, crean una infinidad de falsos positivos, que reciben un tratamiento completamente innecesario y altamente nocivo. 2) Como estos falsos positivos sobreviven