Keir Starmer and Dame Antonia Romeo are at the centre of questions about who really runs Britain. The issue is whether powers over policy delivery, Cabinet management, civil service reform and national security coordination are shifting further into Whitehall.
Most renewable electricity in the world is not wind or solar, it is hydropower.
Hydro produces about 14% of global electricity, and more than half of all renewable power.
It is reliable, dispatchable, and produces virtually no CO2 - yet many environmental groups oppose new dams.
The same contradiction appears with nuclear power.
Nuclear produces zero operational CO2, runs 24 hours a day, and uses far less land than wind or solar.
If cutting emissions were truly the priority here, the focus would be obvious: Hydropower and nuclear, not endless wind and solar expansion.
After Ancient Apocalypse aired, the critical response from mainstream media and academic archaeology was swift and coordinated. Randall went through ten to twelve independent criticisms of the show - from journalists, from archaeologists, from sources presenting themselves as separate and unaffiliated - and found nothing of substance in any of them. What he found instead was something that struck him as far more significant than the criticism itself. The same phraseology. The same arguments. The same framing, repeated across supposedly independent sources with a consistency that pointed not to genuine independent analysis but to a shared origin.
Randall is direct about what that pattern implies. Someone assembled that script and distributed it. The coordination required to produce identical talking points across multiple mainstream outlets and academic voices does not happen organically - it requires organization, intent, and a decision made somewhere by someone with both the motivation and the reach to make it happen. Randall names Graham Hancock as a friend and makes clear this is personal as well as principled. The erasure and rewriting of history he has been documenting throughout his research is not an abstract institutional tendency. It has an author - and Randall states plainly that in the interest of disclosure, he would very much like to know who that is.
A BBC article claims the island of Cartí Sugdupu (Gardi Sugdub) is being abandoned because of rising seas.
But that's not what's happening.
More than 1,000 people live on an island denser than New York City (without the high rises). Residents are relocating because there is no space, not because the island is drowning.
The broader science tells the same story.
A large satellite analysis of more than 700 islands across 30 atolls found 88.6% were either stable or increased in size, while only about 11% shrank.
Another major study of Tuvalu's 100 islands found 73 islands expanded between 1971 and 2014, which, despite alarmist photo ops by the UN, increased the country's total land area by 2.9%.
Coral islands naturally shift, build and reshape themselves. But that reality doesn't fit the narrative.
🚨 This is very important. Today the government will unveil its Land Use Framework.
It is based on and aligned with the UN Agenda 2030 sustainable development goals. Goal 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), Goal 13 (Climate Action), Goal 15 (Life on Land)
This is not about protecting the countryside. It’s about redefining land itself ! how it is used,what it is worth,
and who ultimately decides what you can do with it.
Under these frameworks, land is no longer simply owned, it is measured, categorised, and managed against central net zero targets.
And once that happens, it can be restricted, steered, used to offset and of course monetise.
The language will sound all fluffy and virtuous, but the reality is total control of all land.
"The 6th biggest economy in the world is run by infantile fantasists with no understanding of financial markets.... There's nothing progressive about driving the economy of a cliff"📉⛰️
@LiamHalligan @ #BattleFest 2025 "From steel to railways: can the state revitalise British industry?"👨🏭🚆
👇
Here's what NASA's satellite data actually show about global vegetation growth between 2000 and 2017 alone.
The planet's leaf area index increased by 5%, adding an area twice the size of the Continental United States in new green growth.
Much of this greening is happening in semi-arid and dry regions, including large parts of Africa, where plants are responding to increased atmospheric CO2.
Overall, NASA estimates that over 25% of the global vegetated surface is significantly greener today than it was at the start of the century.
Far from the catastrophizing 'desert expansion' predictions, many of the world's driest landscapes are actually growing greener.
New research claims human emissions are not driving atmospheric CO2.
A paper by Dai Ato ran multiple linear regressions for 1959 to 2022, testing two predictors of the annual CO2 increase: sea surface temperature and human emissions.
The result was clear, when the oceans warmed, CO2 levels rose almost exactly in step: about two to three ppm for every 1C of warming.
Adding human emissions to the model didn't change the outcome.
Using only ocean temperature, the model reproduced global CO2 levels with near-perfect accuracy, a correlation of 0.995 and an error of just one to two ppm by 2022.
The main factor governing the annual increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is sea surface temperature rather than human emissions.
Earlier studies have shown the same pattern.
Temperature changes first, CO2 follows.
If Ato is correct, cutting human emissions won't lower atmospheric CO2 because it's the oceans that set the pace.
Lord Christopher Monckton argues that the UK government is deliberately destroying the British economy.
"It's not a matter of accident."
"It's all about destroy, destroy, destroy, kill, kill, kill. That's what communism is all about. They know what they're doing."
"They wish to destroy us. Until you understand that, you understand nothing."
"That's the trouble we're facing here. They really mean us harm."
🚨BOMBSHELL EXPOSÉ: TREVOR PHILLIPS RIPS LID OFF LABOUR'S GROOMING GANGS COVER-UP 💣
Keir Starmer and the Labour Party Sabotaging National Inquiry to Hide Racial Targeting of White Girls and Decades of Failure in Their Own Councils
In a devastating intervention, Sir Trevor Phillips has blown the whistle on what he calls a deliberate political cover-up at the heart of Britain's grooming gangs scandal.
The former Equality and Human Rights Commission chair accuses Labour of sabotaging the national inquiry because of its explosive racial implications — and because so much of the abuse took place under Labour-controlled councils that did nothing to stop it.
“The government clearly never wanted these two things to be put together,” Phillips declared. He points to Labour's efforts to downplay “the intersection of race and sexual predation,” insisting the perpetrators deliberately targeted victims because they were white and outside the groomers' community.
“These children are chosen because of their race. They are chosen because they are white and because they’re outside the community of the groomers.”
Phillips highlights the chilling uniqueness of these crimes: unlike typical child abuse kept hidden, grooming gangs operate in plain sight — with perpetrators knowing they are shielded.
“The other thing is these people know that they are protected. They’re protected politically, they’re protected by social workers, they’re protected by local police. That is the scandal here.”
He pulls no punches on why a full reckoning has been avoided: “Much of this took place in local Labour councils and the authorities who were supposed to be watching over this, stopping it, monitoring it and all the rest of it were controlled by those councils and they did nothing.”
This is not just institutional failure — it's a politically motivated shield thrown over horrific, racially aggravated sexual exploitation that went on for years under Labour's watch.
Right now, they deserve justice — and Britain deserves the full, fearless national inquiry that has been denied for far too long.
California's $2.2 billion solar plant is shutting down.
Once hailed as a breakthrough, the Ivanpah Solar Facility in the Mojave Desert is now a case study in failed technology and environmental risk.
Built with $1.6 billion in federal loans in 2014, the plant was hailed as a symbol of America's clean energy future.
It used 173,000 mirrors to focus sunlight onto three massive towers, heating fluid to drive steam turbines.
Complicated.
Expensive.
And it never delivered on its promise. After just 11 years, the technology is now obsolete.
On top of that, the facility became notorious for its environmental toll, with estimates of at least 6,000 birds incinerated each year by the concentrated beams.
The promise was affordable, reliable, green power. The reality was high costs, technical failures and ecological damage.
Spain is ripping out centuries-old olive groves for solar farms. Trees that took decades to reach maturity are being uprooted for panel arrays.
This is a direct land-for-energy trade.
26 terawatt-hours of output from solar requires roughly 130,000 acres, whereas a modern nuclear plant would deliver that same power using just 430 acres. That is a land gap approaching 300 to 1.
Solar's footprint is not just panels. It is roads, fencing, substations, transmission lines and backup systems.
Spain already stress-tested a high-renewables grid.
In April 2025, a nationwide blackout followed low-grid inertia and heavy reliance on inverter-based generation. The gov is doubling down on this failure.
I almost became a member of the Green Party to access their full policy documents. What I found wasn’t just about recycling and trees, it goes much deeper into global sustainable development frameworks and long-term structural change.
#GreenParty#UKPolitics#Agenda2030 #SustainableDevelopment #PoliticalAccountability
For years, the public was told shrinking sea ice means starving polar bears. Now the data say the opposite.
A new study tracked 770 polar bears around Svalbard over the past 27 years.
The results show body conditions improved since the year 2000, even as the sea ice declined.
The science got it entirely backwards.
Globally, the polar bear population stood at just 5,000 in the 1960s. Today it's more than 30,000.
And worse still for The Narrative, Arctic sea ice extent has held steady for the past 18 years now, showing no trend since 2007.
Antarctic sea ice extent is currently higher than it was in 1988.
That was the year James Hansen warned US Congress about runaway global warming.
Twenty years ago, Al Gore released a film predicting "polar collapse" and was awarded the Nobel Prize for it.
Since then though, Antarctic sea ice extent is up 14%, while over the past three years alone it has risen 31%.
This is not the collapse we were promised.
WATCH: Secretary of Energy Chris Wright calls out the IEA to their face for having "massively gotten off track by a misunderstanding of climate change and the world energy system. I spent my entire life in the world energy system and over 20 years on climate change. But this belief that climate change is urgent, is causing catastrophic damage today, and we have to drop everything and focus everything on that, I can tell you nothing, nothing in the climate data supports that."
Wright: "When the IEA was founded 50 years ago, a little over 80% of global energy came from hydrocarbons. 50 years later... No change even in the market share of where the world gets energy." Wright then calls out the Executive Director of the International Energy Agency Fatih Birol: "If Director Birol is gonna drive an organization to make the world a better place, to have accurate data on energy, at communication among the country's storage, coordinating policies, we need to stay focused on that."