A thread (without typos🤞 but lots of gifs!)of things related to #intelligence analysis that may be of interest (accidentally deleted an earlier version)
First up, using John Carpenter's 1982 horror movie The Thing to teach structured analytic techniques
https://t.co/qYFu5kUr61
@ArlingtonNatl This belongs in Arlington as much as a monument to the 9/11 hijackers does, which is to say not at all.
No country or entity that took up arms against the U.S. should be honored at Arlington or DoD property. We wouldn’t have a Ft Bin Laden or USS Tojo.
@MarshaBlackburn Are these the same IRS agents that are supposedly going to bust into the homes of god-fearing Americans with AK-47s, shoot their dogs and do audits? I thought the IRS folks were supposed to be the bad guys? Now she trusts them on decisions that aren't part of their jobs?
@KevinMKruse Note the cultural touchstones they try to associate with DeSantis (they see these as compliments!)
1) A serial killer
2) an organized crime boss
Also, a lot of oiled up naked guys 🤷♂️??
@HeerJeet Just because it wasn't a MTLB shouldn't make it a big deal. An escalation *could* be if they used western supplied munitions to attack targets in Russia that Ukrainian forces couldn't hit in 2022.
@AlexC_EMHS Love these...So much better than those dumb, overused Punisher, Grim Reaper images.
I'd be really interested to know what the designers were trying to convey when they selected them and see how the public interprets them.
Can't go wrong with Wily E. Coyote.
Things get even crazier.
AIP:
• Suggests optimal route based on terrain analysis
• Identifies and disrupts enemy communication nodes
You can then use AIP to summarise and submit the operation plan.
AIP has successfully helped you determine the course of action.
When I worked street gangs and terrorism, pictures of both giving kids guns was a sign of their depravity, disregard for human life and just how different they were from normal people. Just saying...
@AlexC_EMHS A good check to see just how consistent folks are on extremism is to ask if this is terrorism & then ask if throwing a molotov at an SUV dealership is too (assuming both motivations were ideological). I think you can argue yes or no to both but not a different answer to each.