BREAKING: The U.S. government has established a new interagency body to coordinate UAP investigations, improve the collection and analysis of relevant data, and assist with the declassification of UAP-related information, according to an official from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI).
I wasn’t aware of the sexual assault accusations, certainly a bad choice.
I do think having a representative from the hardcore skeptic community is a good idea though. They are a barometer for many outside this topic. If you can get those people to pause and consider they might be wrong then you have hit evidentiary gold.
Announced members of the UAP Science Advisory Council, led by Avi Loeb, include:
-Dr. Richard Cloete
-Dr. Regina Sarmiento
-Prof. Garry Nolan
-Dr. Tim Gallaudet
-Prof. Matthew Szydagis
-Dr. Devesh Nandal
-Prof. Peter Skafish
-Dr. Michael Shermer
-Dr. Jennice Vilhauer
-Dr. Omer Eldadi
@GrantLavac@SkywatcherHQ Perhaps they over delivered and got absorbed in some other way? 🤷♂️
Were they (or their dogwhistle) involved in that closure of El Paso airspace earlier in the year?
@BBCNews@disclosureorg Yes, just look at the incursions over RAF Lakenheath and other bases a couple of years ago. No update of significance since.
https://t.co/lSGS0nnUM3
Saw Disclosure Day last night but needed to give it some time to percolate through my brain. 🤯
I left feeling confused about what I had just watched. Was it a commentary on government, military contractors, religion, fear, technology, psi, cover-ups, or a mix of all of these? It felt messy.
But I think that’s the reason I loved it, this topic IS messy. It’s attempt to bring in so many complex facets felt relatable. The unanswered questions stemming from the story felt relatable - I left wanting more. ‘The Day after Disclosure’ perhaps. It might not play as well outside of the UFO community, but I think it was great.
@JackSarfatti The fact is that almost everyone who has a theory about the physics of UFOs is incapable of conveying the message effectively or making any use of it.
@MickWest@MrHustleMCR If that’s true then who do you think Grusch’s 40 witnesses are? You must have their names if you are so certain they are circular reporting between themselves…
Grusch alleges the USAF attempted to file an Espionage Act complaint against him despite DOPSR approval, and that Biden White House officials worked behind the scenes to undermine him. #ufoX#ufotwitter
https://t.co/gxjCwSw87B
#UFOx#UFOtwitter#UAP#NHI
Credit @NewsNation
BREAKING🔥
UAP/UFO Whistleblower Maj. DAVID GRUSCH
Speaks on U.S. Capitol steps today, June 9, 2026
as Congress and whistleblowers ramp up demands for UFO transparency and release of groundbreaking files.
This is HUGE news.
PhD astronomer and former NASA engineer Ivo Busko has single-handedly driven a final nail into the coffin of the contamination-based hypotheses (e.g. plate defects and cosmic rays) proposed to explain the VASCO transients. He did so using one of the most creative approaches in astronomy I have ever seen: by analysing pre-Sputnik photographic plates from a German telescope known to suffer from severe optical distortions (aberrations), he demonstrated that the transients appear on these plates and exhibit the same optical distortions as the stars themselves. They are slightly narrower and sharper than the stars, consistent with brief flashes.
This is a crucial result. It shows that the transient light passed through the telescope optics, meaning the transients originate from real objects producing light, rather than from plate defects or cosmic-ray contamination that hit the plate. Dr Busko has also shown that the transients cluster spatially and are associated with periods close to nuclear tests. See the example of the triple transient with optical comas.
This is the greatest gift. Congratulations, Ivo.
I'm happy beyond belief.
Read Ivo Busko's paper: https://t.co/6CT58wnsKJ