@Mrchinazorduru1@OtitoNosike Still goes back to my original point, we aren't good at critical self reflection in Nigeria because docility is encouraged. Truly if I was in Peller's place, i would feel offended but i am not. Surely, you don't think the sentiment shared by Ycee is a viewpoint from a few??
@Mrchinazorduru1@OtitoNosike I agree it does sounds harsh because we are not very receptive of criticism in our society. But might i add that he probably used Peller more as an allegory for his point because it probably will resonate with a lot more people. He is the most recognizable person in that movement
@enyinna_ Critical thinking and views are often discouraged because in our society, we are taught not to question preexisting norms but rather genuflect towards it, as that would make one the ideal child of the soil. It's pathetic honestly
I just finished watching *Off Campus*, and it sparked a deep, uncomfortable realization in me about what weโve been blindly consuming for the last decade. If you pay close attention, right around 2013, a switch flipped in Hollywood's writing rooms. There has been a deliberate, systematic agenda to completely emasculate the modern male lead while aggressively romanticizing female toxicity, and we have all just sat back and watched it happen.
Letโs talk about the most glaring double standard of all: infidelity.
If a male character cheats in a modern movie or show, the narrative immediately crushes him. He is the ultimate villain, a manipulative narcissist, and his entire life is rightfully dismantled by the end of the script. But when a female lead cheats? The tone completely changes. Cue the indie pop music. Suddenly, her infidelity is framed as a "messy era," a "cute mistake," or a brave journey of self-discovery.
Even worse, the writers actively gaslight the audience into blaming the man she cheated on. The script will bend over backwards to justify her disloyalty by portraying the boyfriend as "emotionally unavailable," "too focused on his job," or simply "too boring." They literally train women to believe that if a man isn't perfectly catering to her every emotional whim 24/7, stepping outside the relationship is a perfectly valid, empowered response.
And look at how they write "strong" women now. Hollywood has completely forgotten how to write a genuinely resilient, intelligent, and elegant female lead. Instead, their idea of a "boss" is a woman who is incredibly rude, emotionally dysregulated, and highly combative. She speaks to the men in her life with absolute venom, never takes accountability, and acts like a literal child when she is told 'no.' Yet, the script demands we applaud her for her "confidence."
Meanwhile, what happens to the men in these shows? They have been entirely stripped of their backbone.
They are no longer written as protectors, leaders, or men with actual boundaries. They are written as hyper-apologetic doormats. If the female lead disrespects him publicly, embarrasses him in front of his friends, or destroys his property, the modern male character doesn't walk away. Instead, he shows up at her apartment in the rain the next morning to apologize for "triggering" her. He is a glorified simp whose only purpose in the story is to absorb her terrible behavior and validate her chaos.
The most dangerous part about this is the real-world translation. Art imitates life, but life also imitates art. We have an entire generation of young men and women who grew up internalizing this garbage.
We now have a demographic of women who genuinely believe that taking zero accountability is a personality trait, and that any man who demands basic respect is "controlling." On the flip side, we have men who are absolutely terrified to set a boundary in their relationships because a decade of media conditioning taught them that standing up for their own dignity makes them "toxic."
They aren't writing romance anymore. They are writing thinly veiled revenge fantasies that normalize absolute disrespect. Until we stop calling female toxicity "empowerment" and male weakness "romantic," the dating pool is going to stay exactly as broken as the movies designed it to be.
@yaygha Now this is a proper deepdive analysis on the average woman's psyche and attitude to perceived weakness. But like he stressed in the follow up posts, not everyone may get it. I would add, it is essential, a wholesome number of dudes read and comprehend this! Bravo bro.
@meemahnyako This directly opposite psite gate. Person probably videoing from Azmafa unity estate.... crazy barbarism and how surreal this is. I lived here once
@n6oflife6 Tom and Jerry really made most of our childhoods. Avatar ushered us into teenhood. So it has to be between the two. Honourable mention to Spongebob Squarepants
@tobyasky performances in the UCL against more seasoned competitors. Rarely do you see teams in laliga, bundesliga or ligue 1 put ten men behind the ball and hope a long throw or a corner kick is their best bet to win a football game.
@tobyasky counter, physically dominate them in duels, at some point they just figured that they have to come up with ingenious ways of winning games even if they have to adopt similar methods as these smaller clubs to earn points on the board. This then translates negatively to their
@tobyasky Interesting assessment... though there's a bit of context for the problems EPL teams especially the big boys are now facing in the UCL, week in, week out they play against teams that struggling for their survival, which are set up not to play, but mostly sit deep against them and
@McFlybowy A very balanced assessment but i would say Joao Neves is the X-factor in that midfield... he can play a competent enough role as the anchor man. Remember that national teams tend not to be as stacked like club teams so there is a bit of nuance to your take.
@YusufAsunmogejo@Elkrosmediahub Sadly intelligent and nuanced takes like this is wasted on misguided and bias minds, the initial post was probably made to farm engagements, of which I'm certain he'll get his heart's desire