𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀

#UltimateViewers: Is A Presenter Of Motivational Media Who Works Independently We're Fully Committed To Serving Humanity,& We Strive To Do So. God Bless BIAFRA!

[𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 @UltimateViewers]

BREAKING: The zoo army is going house to house taking IPOB members away in ABA right now, they have started it from ngwa-road coming down to portharcout road in Aba, Abia State. Please this is urgent information.

Retweet till zoo army stop abducting our people!

@MaziNnamdiKanu

[𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 @UltimateViewers]

Barrister Aloy Ejimakor Raises Concern Over Calls For Death Penalty Against Nnamdi Kanu, Warning Of Possible International Repercussions.

Read More ⤵️
https://t.co/kHsK5xXHc4

[𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 @UltimateViewers]

I Keep Hearing The Same Plea: When Will The United States Or Britain Recognize Biafra? When Will They Sanction Tinubu? When Will They Free Mazi Nnamdi Kanu? ~ Mike Arnold.

READ ⤵️
https://t.co/ceS329T28k

[𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 @UltimateViewers]

British Citizens Convicted Abroad Are Not Subject To Death Penalty. ~ By ALOY EJIMAKOR

READ⤵️
https://t.co/GXrfeOYwLW

[aloy ejimakor @AloyEjimakor]

British citizens convicted abroad are not subject to death penalty

The Federal Government of Nigeria's recent cross-appeal seeking to elevate Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s sentence from life imprisonment to the death penalty introduces a volatile mix of domestic law, geopolitical friction and human rights disputes.

Because Mazi Nnamdi Kanu holds dual Nigerian and British citizenship, this development creates a direct diplomatic collision course between Abuja and London.

By filing a cross-appeal to demand the death penalty, the Federal Government has demonstrated a surprising ignorance of the consequences of contemplating death penalty on a British citizen ‘convicted’ abroad.

From the diplomatic and legal standpoint, Britain has a rigid, non-negotiable foreign policy against the death penalty and vehemently opposes capital punishment in all circumstances, worldwide, as a matter of principle.

For a British citizen convicted abroad, the UK government is bound by consular and diplomatic protocols to intervene actively by escalating from standard consular monitoring to high-level diplomatic pressure and it will be intense.

And these consequences go beyond Britain, as it often triggers a wider diplomatic backlash, potentially affecting foreign aid, trade agreements and bilateral relations between Nigeria and Western nations who align with the UK's stance against the death penalty.

#AloyEjimakor.

[𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 @UltimateViewers]

The Nigerian Government Has Appealed For The Death Sentence Of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. But What Crime Has He Committed? Only Calling For The Freedom And Self-Determination Of His People. This Injustice Won’t Stand, Not Today, Not Forever. #MNK Committed No Crime!

#FreeNnamdiKanu.

[aloy ejimakor @AloyEjimakor]

It was during the trial of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu that the Federal Government initially requested the ‘death’ penalty & it failed. Now, they carried it to the Court of Appeal; it shall also fail. So, the faithful should relax. But those happy about it should claim it as their portion.

[Kanunta kanu @MaziKanuntaKanu]

ANNIHILATING EMEKA UGWUONYE'S DRIVEL

June 7, 2026

FG’S CROSS-APPEAL DEMANDING DEATH FOR MAZI NNAMDI KANU IS A JURISDICTIONAL SUICIDE BOMB — NOT A FOREGONE CONCLUSION

The Federal Government and its propaganda agents are desperately pushing the lie that their Cross-Appeal demanding the death penalty for Mazi Nnamdi Kanu means the conviction is ironclad and the Court of Appeal (CoA) must simply affirm it and vary the sentence to death. This is pure falsehood and must be eviscerated with the raw force of the law and the FG’s own words.

The job of the Court of Appeal is NOT to "rectify" or cure an absence of jurisdiction in the lower Court. Its sacred duty is to validate or nullify the proceedings/judgment based on the law — nothing more.

The Fulcrum: FG’s Own Damning Admission

In their Cross-Appeal (Notice of Cross-Appeal, Grounds of Appeal, page 1363), the Federal Government explicitly pleads:

“The learned trial Judge acted without jurisdiction when he imposed a sentence of life imprisonment…”

They further assert that the offences carry a mandatory sentence under Section 1(2)(H) of the Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 2013, with zero discretion vested in Hon. Justice J.K. Omotosho, rendering the life sentence illegal, null, void, and liable to be set aside ex debito justitiae.

This is not clever advocacy. This is legal suicide — a binding admission against interest made by the prosecution itself.

Core Principle: Nullity, Not Rectification (Madukolu v. Nkemdilim)

Absence of jurisdiction is fatal and extrinsic to the adjudication. Proceedings conducted without jurisdiction are a nullity ab initio — no matter how well conducted, how brilliant the judgment, or how fair the hearing appeared. The defect cannot be cured or rectified on appeal.

The Court of Appeal (and Supreme Court) does not have the power to breathe life into a fundamentally incompetent proceeding by "fixing" the jurisdictional defect. Instead:

It declares the proceedings/judgment a nullity.
It sets aside the entire decision (conviction and sentence).
It strikes out the matter or makes consequential orders consistent with nullity.
This is the immortal principle in Madukolu v. Nkemdilim (1962): Any defect in competence renders proceedings a nullity. Appellate courts have no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal on the merits if the lower court lacked jurisdiction — the entire process is void. Once the CoA determines lack of jurisdiction below, its role ends with nullification. It does not "rectify," amend, or substitute a valid process where none existed.

Application to the Cross-Appeal: Total Annihilation

The FG’s own words — “acted without jurisdiction” — are the fulcrum that destroys their case. The Cross-Appeal is distinct, yet its poisonous concession infects the entire judgment. A Court that lacked power to impose life imprisonment (as FG admits) equally lacked power to convict. The adjudicative continuum is indivisible.

The CoA cannot use this jurisdictionally defective sentencing process to impose death or validate life imprisonment. It must strike down the sentencing exercise — and by extension, the conviction — as a nullity. The FG cannot approbate and reprobate. They cannot declare the trial Court incompetent while begging the CoA to hang Mazi Nnamdi Kanu using that same void process.

This self-inflicted catastrophe powerfully reinforces every ground in Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s substantive Brief: jurisdictional collapse, fair hearing violations, corpus delicti failure, and constitutional nullity.

The Court of Appeal does not sit as a repair shop for defective trials. It sits to enforce constitutional and statutory limits on judicial power. Where jurisdiction was absent — as the FG itself now admits — the only honest outcome is nullification, leading to the quashing of the conviction and sentence in their entirety.

[aloy ejimakor @AloyEjimakor]

IPOB PRESS STATEMENT

SUBJECT: Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu Accepts In Toto the Federal Government's Cross-Appeal Damning Admission: Trial Court Acted Without Jurisdiction — A Total Collapse That the Court of Appeal Cannot Cure

The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) wishes to draw the attention of the world, the international community, and all men of conscience to yet another spectacular self-inflicted wound by the APC-led Federal Government of Nigeria in its desperate attempt to keep Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu in perpetual bondage.

In its Notice of Cross-Appeal filed against the judgment of the Federal High Court, Abuja (Coram: Hon. Justice J.K. Omotosho), delivered on the 20th day of November, 2025, the Federal Government unequivocally declared in black and white that the trial Court acted without jurisdiction when it imposed life imprisonment on Counts 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6.

Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, the indefatigable Lion of Biafra and Leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, accepts this premise in toto. We adopt the Federal Government’s own words as our own. If the trial Court acted without jurisdiction at the sentencing phase, then the entire sentencing exercise is a nullity ab initio. Jurisdiction is not divisible. It is a sacred continuum. You cannot validly convict a man and then lack jurisdiction to sentence him on the same counts. That is judicial absurdity.

As the Supreme Court made clear in the immortal Madukolu v. Nkemdilim (1962), once there is a feature in the case that prevents the court from exercising jurisdiction, the entire proceedings are null and void no matter how well conducted. The Federal Government has now supplied that fatal feature through its own pleading. With the greatest respect, the Court of Appeal lacks the power to repair, cure, or resuscitate what the Respondent itself has declared jurisdictionally dead.

The FG cannot approbate and reprobate. They cannot admit the sentencing phase was conducted without jurisdiction and in the same breath urge the Court of Appeal to impose the death penalty on that same rotten foundation. This is not law; this is legal gymnastics born out of desperation and bad faith.

If the ill-thought-out Cross-Appeal orchestrated by the Attorney General of the Federation, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, Chief Awomolo, SAN, and the Yoruba APC Presidency is aimed at intimidating Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu into renouncing Biafra, then they have grossly miscalculated. Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is the reincarnation of the indomitable Biafran spirit and will never yield to such cheap blackmail. Other former freedom fighters may be cowards, but not Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. To the FG, we say: bring it on.

This self-destructive Cross-Appeal is a clear manifestation of divine intervention and the inevitable collapse of the entire fabricated case against Onyendu. The Federal Government has handed us the sledgehammer to demolish their own conviction. The sentencing is void. The foundation is shattered. The entire prosecution stands on quicksand.

We call on the Court of Appeal to do justice by dismissing the Cross-Appeal with ignominy and allowing the Appellant’s main appeal in its entirety, leading to the immediate and unconditional release of Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

The world is watching. History is watching. No amount of judicial acrobatics or cheap intimidation can cure a fundamental lack of jurisdiction. The Lion of Biafra remains unbowed, and the spirit of Biafra remains unconquerable.

Signed:

Emma Powerful
Spokesperson, Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB)
07 June 2026.

[𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 @UltimateViewers]

Kidnappers Of Retired Major General Rabe Abubakar & His Wife, Abducted In Katsina State, Have Released A Four-Minute Video Demanding A Swap For Their Freedom.

They're Insisting On:
The Release Of Three Detained fighters (Sani, Aminu, And Nasiru).
The Return Of Seized Livestock.

[𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 @UltimateViewers]

A Sacred Appeal To Elohim: Prayers For Peace, Freedom, And National Restoration

WATCH ⤵️
https://t.co/hUABzGSehm

[𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 @UltimateViewers]

David Umahi, Has Defended President Tinubu Against Criticisms Over Insecurity, Arguing That The Challenge Predates The Current Administration. He Questioned The Recurring Rise In Insecurity During Election Periods & Urged Critics To Refrain From Unfairly Blaming The President.

[𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 @UltimateViewers]

Barrister @AloyEjimakor Gives Important Update Regarding Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's Legal Proceedings And Related Issues.

[𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 @UltimateViewers]

"I Relayed These Genuine Concerns To #MNK, And He Subsequently Instructed Me To Make The Following Information Public."

— Barrister Aloy Ejimakor

READ ⤵️
https://t.co/pAXTSw8VGU

[aloy ejimakor @AloyEjimakor]

SPECIAL UPDATE:
In the past few days, I have been inundated with inquiries from legions of wellwishers (in Nigeria & abroad) as to whether the appellate Brief for MAZI NNAMDI KANU has been filed.

I relayed these genuine concerns to #MNK & he instructed me to now publicly disclose that:

YES. The Brief has been filed, but it’s not the version that was circulated on social media some days ago.

What now remains is for the Government to join issues by filing it’s own reply Brief, and so soon thereafter, the Court of Appeal will set a date for the hearing of the appeal or adoption of the respective Briefs in open court.

Once this is done, the Court will be minded to render its judgment within 90 days, as required by law.

Thank you.

ALOY EJIMAKOR.
#AloyEjimakor.

[𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 @UltimateViewers]

The Kuje Hearing Has Concluded. Despite Our Readiness, The Trial Was Adjourned To July 31, 2026, Because The Prosecution Failed To Appear.

Though This Delay Is Frustrating, Our Fight For Truth, Justice, & Freedom Continues. Thank You For Your Support & Prayers. — @AloyEjimakor

[aloy ejimakor @AloyEjimakor]

This update follows the conclusion of the Kuje hearing a few minutes ago today. In summary, our TRIAL was adjourned to 31st July 2026 because the prosecution did not come. Till then, the struggle in defense of freedom continues. Thank you all for your support & prayers.

[aloy ejimakor @AloyEjimakor]

UPDATE: On our way to Kuje to stand trial for daring to protest for the release of MAZI NNAMDI KANU in October last year. Today, they must SHOW ME THE LAW we violated. #UnfairTrial.

[𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 @UltimateViewers]

@AloyEjimakor They Are Running Because They Don't Have Any Evidence To Offer. Mad People! Ndi Ara...

[𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 @UltimateViewers]

UPDATE: We Are Heading To Kuje Today, June 5, 2026, To Stand Trial For Protesting For Kanu’s Release Last Oct. Peaceful Protest Is Not A Crime. They Want To Criminalize Our Speech, But They Must Prove What Law We Broke. We Stand Firm Against This Persecution.
​— Bar Aloy Ejimakor

[𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 @UltimateViewers]

@AloyEjimakor Good Luck To You All...🙏