Hello Mrs. Owens,
You told millions of people that Tyler Robinson "wasn't even there." That you felt "confident stating that Tyler Robinson did not kill murder Charlie Kirk."
He was on camera. Prone on the Losi rooftop at 12:22. Shot at 12:23:28. DNA on the screwdriver at 30 quintillion to one. DNA on the rifle at 1.7 octillion to one. He told his family what he did. His parents helped him surrender. He texted his roommate: "I am, I'm sorry." He engraved "Hey Fascist! Catch!" on the ammunition a month before he used it.
You said police "didn't even question" Lance Twiggs. He was interviewed twice. FBI the morning after. Joint state-federal team seven months later. His own attorney. Voluntary phone surrender. You laughed when you said it.
You told Shawn Ryan a shaped charge killed Charlie. That PETN was in his microphone. The medical examiner says gunshot wound. Bullet fragments were recovered from his body. A .30-06 Mauser with Robinson's DNA was found in the woods. Neither side — not prosecution, not defense — has mentioned explosives. Not once in four days.
You said the shot came from below. The Losi building is above the amphitheater.
You called Erika Kirk a "clinical psychopath" to an audience of millions. You said the assassination was "an occult ritual." You said Charlie was "sitting in a pentagram." You told people Israel killed him because he refused Netanyahu.
You made over a hundred episodes. You built a franchise on a dead man's name.
And the hardest fact of all: Tyler Robinson's own defense lawyers — the people whose entire career is on the line to get him acquitted — have refused to make a single one of your arguments. Not one. They're challenging DNA methodology. They are doing their jobs. You were doing something else entirely.
Charlie Kirk changed my life. He platformed my work when nobody knew who I was. He had my back when I was doxxed. I was the ten-thousandth most important person in his world and I will never be able to repay him.
So I did what I know how to do. I read every transcript. I watched every hour of testimony. I cataloged your claims and I held them up against what was said under oath.
Every single one failed.
I don't know why you did this. I'm not going to speculate on your motives, because that would make me exactly the kind of analyst I've spent my career refusing to be. But I know what you did. You told people confident lies about a dead man's murder, and millions of them believed you, and some of them turned that belief into threats against his widow.
The trial continues. And every day of sworn testimony is another day your words get tested against reality... under oath, on the record, where it counts.
I'll be here for all of it... because just as Charlie defended me, I will do what little I can to defend his legacy and @TPUSA and @MrsErikaKirk from evil.
Cursing Christians and Jews is a standard part of Islamic prayers, recited millions if not billions of times every day by Muslims around the world. It's based on the opening chapter of the Koran, which reads:
“Guide us to the straight path — the path of those upon whom You have bestowed favor, not of those who have incurred Your wrath [Jews] or of those who are astray [Christians].”
In this video, not only does the Egyptian soccer team recite this repudiation of Christians and Jews, but — and because its playing mostly Christian teams — it repeatedly recites — thrice — other segments of the Koran that distinctly condemn Christians:
“Say, 'He is Allah, who is One... He neither begets nor is born, nor does he have an equivalent'... Infidels are they who say, 'God is one in a Trinity.' There is only One God. If they do not stop saying this, they will be afflicted with a painful punishment” [Koran 112:1-4 and 5:73].
And people wonder if it's true that Egypt's national soccer team openly rejects Coptic Christian players.
Of course, whenever a Christian player is exceedingly good, they try to entice him to convert to Islam to join the team.
Such is the sick mentality that is being welcomed into the global "fraternity of sports."
Fascinating.
Messi earns around $1.5 million *per week* from football + football-related commercial deals.
Who do you think builds the stadiums he plays in? Makes the kits he sells? Mans the cameras which broadcast his "product" to the world? Cleans the dressing room he changes in? Makes the food supporters buy in the stadium? Brews the beer fans buy in the stadium? Sells the beer fans buy in the stadium? Cuts the grass he plays on? Makes the boots he wears and the millions of replica boots he sells?
All of these people's labour goes into making him $1.5 million a week.
What do you think the ratio of his weekly earnings is to those people? He earns around $80 million a year from football alone which is approximately 5 times the average top 500 US CEO so by your logic he is FAR more "exploitative" than they are.
The fact that you don't understand this proves my original point perfectly. Thank you for your help.
You know what shook me when I was Muslim?
The story of Hosea. God tells a prophet to marry a woman He knows will betray him.
She does. She runs to other men. She ends up enslaved, sold, used up, worthless to the world.
And God tells Hosea to go BUY HER BACK.
To pay money for his own wife who cheated on him, and love her again. Hosea 3.
I thought it was the most humiliating command in the Bible. Why would any man do that?
Then I realized I was the wife.
I gave my heart to everything but God. I chased other masters. I sold myself cheap. I made myself worthless.
And God looked at me, the betrayer, and didn’t say “you’re not worth it.”
He said, “Name the price. I’m buying her back.”
That’s the Gospel. God doesn’t wait for the unfaithful to come crawling back clean.
He pays to redeem them while they’re still dirty.
Islam told me to make myself worthy of God.
Hosea showed me a God who pays to redeem the unworthy.
The cross was Him naming the price.
Praise the Lord.
I’m granting nepo baby @TuckerCarlson permission to publish the text messages he claims to have stating that I told him “President Trump shut down the investigation into Butler.”
Those were his words, and he should show he has a pair of balls and publish them.
Spoiler alert 🚨:
He won’t. Because they don’t exist. I’ve already shown you the messages which say the opposite. I’m really sorry if you’re still dumb enough to fall for this Times Square “Rolex” salesman’s act.
Woke 2.0 is coming. It's starting already.
Rather than foregrounding identity politics, it will push:
1) Affordability (Marxist materialism);
2) Anti-corruption (ironic but an excuse to go after Trump);
3) Anti-Israel (pro-Palestine).
It will be warm to political violence.
This opinion might not be popular (but not too unpopular), but I disagree that Scott Wiener was harassed in this park because he is Jewish, and empathy for him on that front is semi-suicidal and misplaced.
In my view, Wiener was not harassed because he is Jewish but rather because he didn't take the full Leftist-approved Gaza line voluntarily before being challenged. Saying he was harassed for being Jewish misses the crucial point and gives him cover he doesn't deserve.
Radical Muslims would harass him for being Jewish, of course, and so would Woke Right chuds and their Neo-Nazi friends, but Leftists wouldn't. Not directly, anyway, and probably not actually intentionally. Leftists don't think like that, and this is very important
For Leftists, the crucial variable in play is whether or not you espoused their fully correct ideological point of view spontaneously without having to be told because you recognized it on your own (that is, you're socially enlightened, by their definition). The "transformed" person in Leftism, who is the only person who has worth, recognizes the world "from the people's standpoint," and to fail to recognize it is to prove that you are not correctly oriented and thus in line with the oppressor.
This is a completely different line of thought than harassing him because he is Jewish.
All the way back to Karl Marx in his 1843 (very early Marx) "On the Jewish Question," it's clearly articulated that the Left's problem with Jews is that they have a different way of viewing the work, which is being Jewish. The problem, though, is the worldview being wrong. Marx's solution is to "remove the Jewishness from the Jew," to paraphrase.
This difference is crucially important. These two things are not the same.
Scott Wiener built and nourished the revolutionary Leftist ideology and advanced it considerably. Then he failed it on its own terms. He deserves no sympathy for this, especially given how much information there is about this being inevitable and the fate of every single one of the people pushing Leftism.
Don't give him sympathy for something he doesn't deserve for reasons that aren't correct.
This is why no one in any Western country can cut any welfare spending ever and why we keep going further and further into debt.
Because any time anyone reduces spending on anything, an example can be wheeled out of a person who suffered or even died as a result.
On this basis, there can never be too much spending, too much aid or too much tax.
Indeed, the author of the tweet I am quoting will almost certainly oppose paying taxes of 100% or having 100% of his country's GDP be used in aid to the developing world. Despite the fact that his failure to give all his/his country's money away is demonstrably killing people right now. How many lives could be saved by having all of his money go to Africa? How many millions could be saved by having all of the federal budget be sent to the poorest parts of the world?
In Argentina, rent freezes destroyed the housing market.
When Milei got rid of the price controls, supply rose by 300%, and rent prices decreased compared to inflation.
But communists are nothing if not absolute idiots who refuse to learn from history.
Tucker Carlson Says He Used to Criticize Islam, but Now He Sees the Light
Tucker Carlson has issued a mea culpa, but not the one he needs to issue. The Clash Report reported Thursday that the newly antisemitic news personality “publicly disavowed his previous hostile statements regarding Islam and issued a sharp critique of Donald Trump’s foreign policy record.” Yet what Carlson actually offered was a parade of straw men. He misrepresented his own previous comments, and then went on to misrepresent the U.S. conflict with Iran and the state of Israel as well. Carlson clearly thinks that there is nothing he can say or do that will result in him losing his massive audience.
“Many times I said on television,” Carlson said Thursday, “‘The problem is Islam. The problem is Muslims. They all want to kill us. They’re all crazy. They’re all in this lunatic suicide cult created by Muhammad in the 7th century.’ And I believed that. I was hysterical. I believed that. No, that’s not true. Nothing about that is true, but I believed it.”
I can’t say that I’ve seen more than a handful of Tucker Carlson’s shows, at best, but I can nevertheless state categorically and with one-hundred percent certainty that Tucker Carlson never actually said “The problem is Islam. The problem is Muslims. They all want to kill us. They’re all crazy. They’re all in this lunatic suicide cult created by Muhammad in the 7th century.”
Tucker Carlson is committing the all too common fallacy of conflating Islam and Muslims. In reality, to say that there are problems with Islam, or even that “the problem with Islam,” doesn’t say anything about “all Muslims,” because there are degrees of knowledge of the religion and commitment to it among Muslims, just as there are among adherents of all religions. No serious analyst ever says “all Muslims want to kill us,” or that all the members of any group want to do anything.
If Tucker Carlson had ever said on his Fox show or anywhere else that “all Muslims want to kill us,” he would have been the object of screaming headlines, excoriating him for his “Islamophobia” and demanding that he retract, apologize, end his show, and do various forms of public penance such as visiting a mosque or chatting with officials of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). None of that ever happened, because Tucker never said this.
Also, those of us who did dare to point out that Islam had doctrines of warfare against unbelievers were smeared, defamed, marginalized, deplatformed, and silenced. If Tucker Carlson had said this, which we were accused of saying but that none of us ever actually said, he would never have been allowed to continue to occupy his massive platform.
Compounding Tucker Carlson’s dishonesty here is the fact that he is also making claims about Islam and dismissing those claims as “hysterical,” and will never allow anyone who believes that there is a problem with Islam, or that the problem is Islam, onto his show to discuss it with him. He is, of course, free to feature anyone he wants, but his is not exactly a platform for open and honest discussion of the relevant issues that will allow for opinions that differ from those that Tucker Carlson holds. That also is his right, but when he makes sweeping claims that are false, as he does here, he does his audience an even greater disservice than usual. What about the Qur’an’s violent teachings? What about Islam’s doctrines of conquest and subjugation? Do they simply not exist now because Tucker Carlson says they’re hysterical?
Unfortunately, the jihadis are not uncomfortable with this particular brand of hysteria, and will keep advancing, no matter what Tucker Carlson says.
Read more at the link in the next post.
This is a total lie. In reality, the jizya tax was the Ottoman Empire’s chief source of income in its heyday. The jizya is a tax that the Qur’an says (9:29) should be collected from “the people of the book” (mainly Jews and Christians) as a sign of their subjugation and humiliation.
Let me repeat, anything short of executions is too good for these monsters. The report also details how Islam was a motivating factor! Islam is demonic!