@VeVeVault Apparently we actually had to scan the ticket in to get the nft. Feel bad for those that bought but didn't go. Below is their wording from their site.
@ryansibley34@moonshotherapy@omg_wtf_69 @ScottDogSOL @WatcherGuru The Schrodinger's cat is used as an "example" because most people don't understand quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics takes a long time to understand, even as a scientist. A lot of these experiments give you different results (even when you use the same exact conditions).
@ryansibley34@moonshotherapy@omg_wtf_69 @ScottDogSOL @WatcherGuru Actually, it's a layman's version of real experiments (to appeal to the masses). We do a plethora of various different experiments dealing with quantum mechanics. I suggest actually reading about it.
@GoldenSourceCa1 @DeathCrypton @ScottDogSOL @WatcherGuru My response is specific to the quote, not LUNA or LUNC. I specifically stated "With the right context", and I gave the context of scientific experiments. The point is that the quote does not ALWAYS apply. In the LUNA case it may apply, sure.
@DeathCrypton @ScottDogSOL @WatcherGuru Not always. There are many experiments where we do not change anything and eventually get a different result. In other experiments, yes, we do make changes given that we want to change the conditions for whatever reason(s).
@MikeMcEleney @ScottDogSOL @WatcherGuru What you expect or not expect is irrelevant. Sometimes we do expect a different result and sometimes we don't. This is not a binary classification "this" vs. "that". My point still stands.