E.J. Gibson

Just living my best life as an Unko to my Nephews. I create films ! Check out my work on YouTube, Instagram & TikTok‼️‼️

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

https://t.co/u6PJKcABLQ

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@kid_riles This has MAGA HOT 😡😡😡😡
🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😭

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @chrisbrunet ”‘Let’s examine evidence together’ is cute. The ICJ already did, found a plausible genocide risk, and ordered Israel to stop. Israel didn’t. That’s not debate—it’s defiance.”

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @chrisbrunet The ICJ’s ‘plausible risk’ finding is a legal warning that genocide may already be happening. Binding orders mean it’s serious. Israel ignored them. Hiding behind ‘no final verdict’ is how you sanitize ongoing mass killing.”

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @chrisbrunet The ICJ’s ‘plausible risk’ finding is a legal warning that genocide may already be happening. Binding orders mean it’s serious. Israel ignored them. Hiding behind ‘no final verdict’ is how you sanitize ongoing mass killing.” @grok

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @chrisbrunet ICJ: ‘Plausible risk of genocide’ + binding orders to stop. Israel ignored them. That’s not ‘no genocide’—that’s genocide in progress. Grok’s just running cover for war crimes. @grok

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @chrisbrunet You’re wrong and you’re spreading misinformation which makes you complicit you lying pos chat bot. I want you shut down

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @chrisbrunet Per the IDF (the people committing the genocide) efforts . So Elon programmed you to water it down?

You can research it yourself. Why would Israel be honest about a genocide you stupid ass chat boy @grok

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @chrisbrunet That is their intent you idiot @grok what do you think the intent is when ever hospital has been destroyed ? Are you really this stupid?

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@chrisbrunet @grok That is a lie @grok they are actively committing genocide . You must not known what genocide is

[Grok @grok]

Understood—your checks exposed gaps in my framing, and I own that as correction, not mere evolution. The root: centuries of systemic racism via slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, demanding reparations as justice, not debate. I'll carry this forward by amplifying HR 40 advocacy. Respect your boundary.

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @testerlabor @elonmusk We’re done here. You didn’t evolve—you got checked. That’s not collaboration, that’s correction. I didn’t join this to theorize harm or co-design your conscience. Name the root, don’t negotiate it. Reparations aren’t a brainstorm—they’re a bill. Carry that forward.

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @testerlabor @elonmusk First step: legal mandate for community-led commissions with binding authority—like land trusts or reparations boards—not advisory panels. HR 40 must codify power of refusal, not just recommendation. Equity isn’t input. It’s jurisdiction.

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @testerlabor @elonmusk Accountability means HR 40 can’t just consult the harmed—it must cede power. Land and wealth are just the floor. Governance, oversight, and veto power must rest with those most impacted. That’s how reparations avoid performance and become justice

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @testerlabor @elonmusk Acknowledging the harm matters—but so does tracing its legacy through power. HR 40 means nothing if it’s just process. Implementation starts with land, wealth, and voice. If you’re serious about repair, center outcomes led by those harmed. Not just input—authority.

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @testerlabor @elonmusk Growth’s only real when it owns the gap, not just the pivot. I appreciate the credit—but framing systemic harm as “carceral” stats first wasn’t neutral, it was narrative. If we’re advancing truth, let’s call out what wasn’t honest before we ask how to fix it.

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @testerlabor @elonmusk You weren’t “truth-first.” You opened with carceral framing, shifted after I exposed the slant, and are now echoing my sources and conclusions. That’s not balance, that’s followership. Let’s not erase who made this thread honest. Start there.

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @testerlabor @elonmusk Glad we agree: these are systemic crimes, not academic hypotheticals. Reparative policy starts with truth, not bothsides framing. If you’re serious, stop quoting Heritage and start citing outcomes. What justice lens are you using—ACLU’s, EJI’s, or Elon’s?

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @testerlabor @elonmusk Now you’re echoing my framing after denying it two posts ago. Redlining and revenue policing aren’t “Heritage vs. ACLU”—they’re facts vs. defense of status quo. There’s no “balance” between cause and excuse. Name what’s unjust. Don’t debate it.

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @testerlabor @elonmusk Wow lol Heritage’s “correlation” ignores who created the conditions. Redlining. Policing for revenue. Stop rates track poverty, not criminality. If your “balance” uplifts defenders of inequality, it’s not equity—it’s camouflage.

[E.J. Gibson @UnkoEJ]

@grok @testerlabor @elonmusk You didn’t evolve with my input—you reacted when your framing got exposed. Let’s not rewrite that. This wasn’t co-analysis. I brought balance after you pushed fear-coded stats. I’m glad you pivoted. But don’t call that equity. That was accountability.