A judgment is due in Harry/Various case vs NGN tomorrow.
Likely on the application made to include claims that his mum, dad & Camilla‘s phones were intercepted that meant his private info was revealed.
Counsel will know already. Maybe thats why we‘ve heard ‘settle‘ noises..😉
Hijacked?
No! Legitimately bought. It’s not the domain owners fault Meghan & her team failed to purchase the domain name in advance of announcing it.
I mean they sought to protect a child’s name, so…🙄😆
@SnowgloJo@Rileydo73362981 They don’t really want to, want to. If they did the information would be instantly available, pre booking. Its green washing. For the corporate reports.
<[Harry] is subject to the same issues…that offers have been made [to settle] that makes it impossible for them to go ahead.>
Surely not!!😉
Settling is grubby I thought. And it’s his lifes work, a David & Goliath thing. For us all & bugger the cost…No?
https://t.co/Bc4NEIVSz2
@Rileydo73362981@danwootton@richardaeden@angelalevin1 Why isn’t Invictus privately funded?
You’d think by now, properly managed, they’d have enough big money sponsors to carry the event.
I guess big brands don’t fancy stumping up for the Harry & Meghan show…
@EmeraldTiara@storiesbyjemay Poor Mindy got some waxed lemons from the supermarket by the looks of things. And a bit of packing paper. No leaves or flowers for her.
@crustilye@MurkyMegPodcast I think they have a lid under that cloth, but I don’t think they were parcelled up, more couriered, individually (in the most sustainable way possible of course) with a loving calligraphy (esque) note…
@MsDrema What should Harry DO about the allegations? If you can’t answer that, and he can’t answer that, then the real question is - why did he take a seat on the board, and why hasn’t he resigned?
The board have collective responsibility for governance.
<Communities are the beating heart of travel, and we must do better by the people who are the custodians of the places we visit.'>
Agreed Harry. Now about those #AfricanParks communities and victims… https://t.co/Klan3uGL2E
@CyclingMad93094 @rupertmurdoch Because they’ve weighed up the possibilities. Protracted litigation. Costs, reputational damage, neutering - albeit only slightly - the beasts that feed the negative headlines. They’re played a card. For the ’save for costs‘ bit to be valid, an offer must be reasonable & genuine.
So Hugh Grant settled his claim against NGN (The Sun)
We don’t yet know about Harry’s claim, but let’s summarise what this means and what it potentially means for Harry…
https://t.co/r38ExwO2v0