Extremely Intelligent

Biological/Male

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@BayAreaNewLibs You’re against this because it’s unpopular? Not because it’s immoral?

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@ArmandDoma If I remember correctly the article says there were about 30k cases, so not really a lie but a massive exaggeration

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@altgeosh @ArmandDoma @sephius1999 If I say “no one should listen to your retarded opinions”, am I saying that you shouldn’t be able to voice your retarded opinions?

No, I’m saying that your opinions aren’t worth being read or heard. Because they’re retarded

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@akhivae “alt news networks, memes, citizen journalists”

“They are the mainstream media”

???

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@SalmanMMS @Kingcannibal12 @JihadalHaqq No, it actually goes to show how retarded your comment is. If they didn’t employ the mother at all, would that family be better off or worse?

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@RyanPMcGowan @xwanyex ? That doesn’t say that she was discriminated for being a woman. If you simply go out looking for a better candidate, you look for men and women

Yes, dei was mandated in this case, but you don’t need dei to achieve the result

And, like you said, she was initially there

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@RyanPMcGowan @xwanyex So… no dei needed? She had been excluded, like you said, due to research overlap. She hadn’t been discriminated against for being a woman

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@Sebastian_Hols @xwanyex But the candidate wasn’t any better for being diverse. She was just better. If you go out looking for better candidates, you’ll eventually find one, man or woman

If you read his post, the candidate they went with wasn’t on the list due to admin. bs. She hadn’t been discriminated

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@MasonJettericks @HistorianZhang Not at all. The candidates weren’t good enough and they searched for more candidates. You don’t need any sort of dei policy to do that

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@stanfordNYC Their response is: “I can’t be 100% objective, so I’m gonna be 0% objective”

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@vagoilustrado En este post: gente que no sabe el significado de la palabra “censura”

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@tomvzito Te corrijo, PRESIDENTE ERECTO

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@FreshCutTweets @avidseries You could literally just give extra consideration to having gone to state schools if that’s the case

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@DeAndreW94 @spearmintiron @ArmandDoma You could make that positive discrimination based on socioeconomic level and not race and sex, yet defenders of DEI never want to do that

And before you tell me that race is being used as a proxy for class, bullshit. Class can be used directly

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@f_osoba @themoviedig @emmma_camp_ The fact that the institution where those seats are has an explicit policy that says they will prefer non white candidates over white candidates

People aren’t complaining due to the results, they’re complaining because of these open and explicit discrimination policies

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@rbnmckenna86 You’re comparing perceived, assumed discrimination that can’t be actually proven to objective, explicit and mandated discrimination that can be proven because it’s literally institutional policy

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@AUsefuIldiot @feelsdesperate When it swung the other way, the ones who already had jobs and careers didn’t suffer any consequences, but mandated that the ones that came after them and hadn’t received any preferential treatment would be the ones to pay

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@SaladBarFan It hasn’t gone away at all, and all it takes is the democrats winning in 2028 for it to be back bigger than ever

[Extremely Intelligent @VeryBig_Brain]

@anylaurie16 @writes__code You are comparing perceived, assumed discrimination (which cannot be proven to actually exist) to actual, mandated, explicit discrimination that can be proven objectively because the companies openly admit to doing it