Vincent Wang

עם ישראל חי

[Dan Burmawi @DanBurmawy]

There are two kinds of globalists.

The first are the ideological types.

These are the professors, the activists, the think-tank “intellectuals” who honestly believe the world should move beyond nations, borders, religions, and traditions.

They think humanity can be turned into one big borderless commune.

These people are the heirs of Marx, the apostles of “universal brotherhood.”

To them, Islam is not a threat but a partner, because it positions itself as the voice of the “oppressed,” a force against colonialism, nationalism, and the West itself.

So they welcome it in.

Then there are the pragmatic globalists.

These people don’t care about brotherhood, justice, or ideology. They care about power.

To them, globalism is simply about centralization, bigger structures, bigger markets, easier populations to manage.

They’re fine with Islam too, because Islam produces populations that are more compliant, less individualistic, and easier to collectivize.

Both sides, knowingly or not, are paving the road for Islam’s expansion.

Globalists weaken nations, and a weakened nation is fertile ground for Islamization.

They erase borders, and Islam carries its demographic revolution across them.

Globalists delegitimize Christianity, and Islam steps in to fill the vacuum with uncompromising certainty.

Globalists centralize power in supranational bodies, and suddenly the OIC bloc of 57 Islamic states becomes the largest voting group at the UN, shaping “human rights” law to protect Islam from criticism.

Globalism and Islam converge because they run on the same logic, a world without independent nations, without local sovereignty, governed from above by an absolute authority.

The only difference is the branding:

One does it in the name of humanity.
The other does it in the name of Allah.

The effect is the same, the destruction of the West’s freedom to govern itself.

This is why resisting Islamization without resisting the radical left is pointless.

They feed each other.

The ideologues weaken the walls, the pragmatists build the central tower, and Islam walks right in to claim both.

[Zach זק @ZachLewis3187]

So Pakistan, a country invented in 1947 that was carved out of India and had no history as a people, led to one of the largest population transfers in history, and also included East Pakistan (Bangladesh) which they subjugated brutally is legitimate and good.

Israel, a country rebirthed in 1948 after 3000 years of continual Jewish history, language, culture, and religion, and involved 850,000 Jews having to be brought in due to Arab states kicking them out, fought against five invading armies who attempted to genocide all the Jews, is bad and illegitimate.

The hypocrisy is astounding.

[SK @SparkleKitten39]

The Muslim religion is the fastest-growing religion per capita in the United States, especially among minority races.
Last month I attended a training. During the training session, three speakers representing the Roman Catholic, Protestant, and Muslim faiths each presented their beliefs.
I was particularly interested in what the Islamic Imam had to say. The Muslim gave a great presentation of the basics of Islam, complete with a video.
After the presentations, time was provided for questions and answers. When it was my turn, I directed my question to the Muslim and asked:
'Please, correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand that most Imams and clerics of Islam have declared a holy jihad [Holy war] against the infidels of the world and, that by killing an infidel, (which is a command to all Muslims) they are assured of a place in heaven. If that's the case, can you give me the definition of an infidel?'
There was no disagreement with my statements and, without hesitation, he replied, “Nonbelievers"
I responded, 'So, let me make sure I have this straight. All followers of Allah have been commanded to kill everyone who is not of your faith so they can have a place in heaven. Is that correct?'
The expression on his face changed from one of authority and command to that of a little boy who had just been caught with his hand in the cookie jar.'
He sheepishly replied, 'Yes.'
I then stated, 'Well, sir, I have a real problem trying to imagine the Pope commanding all Catholics to kill those of your faith or Dr. Stanley ordering all Protestants to do the same to guarantee them a place in heaven!'
The Muslim was speechless.
I continued, 'I also have a problem with being your friend when you and your brother clerics are telling your followers to kill me! Let me ask you a question:
Would you rather have your Allah, who tells you to kill me for you to go to heaven, or my Jesus who tells me to love you because I am going to heaven and He wants you to be there with me?'
You could have heard a pin drop.
Needless to say, the organizers and/or promoters of the 'Diversification' training seminar were not happy with my way of dealing with the Islamic Imam, and exposing the truth about the Muslims' beliefs.
In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the US to elect the President.
I think everyone in the U.S. should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized unless each of us sends it on! This is your chance to make a difference.

[Omid Djalili @omid9]

A woman was hanged in Iran yesterday who had endured repeated physical and sexual abuse by her husband who also allowed his ‘associates/friends’ to assault her.

To put this in context, Ruth Ellis was the last woman executed in the UK in 1955. She was granted a posthumous pardon by King Charles III in July 2026.

Her death sentence now acknowledges the profound historic injustice of her hanging and recognizing the severe domestic abuse she suffered.

Executed at age 28 after a 20-minute jury verdict, Ellis's original trial did not account for the impact of prolonged intimate partner violence and abuse on her mental state. Her case became a major catalyst in the eventual abolition of capital punishment in the UK.

Not a such consideration by the barbaric Islamic regime in Iran ⬇️

[Feargal Sharkey @Feargal_Sharkey]

Thames Water's finance director given a £1,000,000 signing on bonus.

Water industry depravity hits an all time low. Their contempt for customers and the environment clearly knows no bounds.

When are govt going to intervene and put a stop to this? @andyburnham @angelaeagle

https://t.co/WB23sNU4hS

[Captain Allen @CptAllenHistory]

Jews meet every criterion of indigenous status under the UN’s own working definition. Palestinians do not.

José R. Martínez-Cobo’s authoritative UN criteria require:

• historical continuity with pre-invasion societies
• common ancestry with the original occupants
• distinct culture, language, and religion tied to the ancestral land
• determination to preserve that identity

Jews satisfy them all:

3,000+ years of continuity and return,
Levantine genetic ancestry,
a culture and religion forged in and centered on the Land of Israel,
and the unique revival of their ancestral language.

This is why Israel is the first modern indigenous state.

Palestinians have legitimate rights of longstanding presence. Those rights are real. They are not indigenous rights under the UN’s own definition.

Arabic and Islam are indigenous to the Arabian Peninsula.
Most Palestinian national identity and culture crystallized in the 20th century.

Conquerors and their descendants do not become indigenous simply by long presence. Accepting that claim would erase the rights of every indigenous people on earth.

The Jews never abandoned their indigenous identity. They carried it through exile and returned.

That is not colonialism.
It is indigenous restoration.

[Ella Ke @EllaTravelsLove]

Fun fact:

When the PLO was founded in 1964, the West Bank was ruled by Jordan and Gaza by Egypt.

Yet the PLO didn't demand the "liberation" of either.

Its founding charter called only for the elimination of Israel.

If this conflict had always been about creating a Palestinian state, why wasn't Jordan's control of the West Bank or Egypt's control of Gaza considered occupation?

Sometimes history asks uncomfortable questions.

[lindi 🇮🇱✡️ @Lyndagee49]

Brilliant letter! From 10 years ago! H/T to Jayne Wynick

British Foreign Secretary, William Hague, warned Israel that if it sent troops into Gaza to confront Hamas, it risked loosing the sympathy of the international community.

A Jewish woman in Britain, Mindy Wiesenberger, sent the following letter to Mr. Hague, in response. The letter has been published in many newspapers, including the Times of Israel.

Dear Mr. Hague

You have stated that if Israel tries to defend its population through a ground offensive in Gaza 'it risks losing the sympathy of the international community.'

Let me tell you something about the sympathy of the international community Mr. Hague.

My father was liberated from Buchenwald concentration camp in 1945, having lost his entire family but gaining the sympathy of the international community at the time.

After 6 million Jews had been annihilated at the hands of the Nazi regime, the international community had plenty of sympathy for the Jewish people. There is always plenty of sympathy for victims.

Israel doesn't need the sympathy of the international community. What it needs is to defend its citizens.

When as a tiny country it gained its independence in 1948 it had to absorb 800,000 Jews who were thrown out of Arab lands in the Middle East, and it did so without fuss and with dignity giving them shelter and a place of security in which their children could grow up to become productive citizens. When Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon and Syria tried to destroy Israel in 1948 and again in 1967 they took in hundreds of thousands of Palestinian Arabs, but did they give them dignity or
shelter? No, they left them to rot in refugee camps in order to maintain
a symbol of grievance against Israel and use them as a political tool against the Jewish state.

What has arisen in those camps is a complicated situation, but it is what has led to Gaza today.

So don't lecture Israel on international sympathy Mr. Hague. Not when Israel has just sent in 120 trucks loaded with food into Gaza to feed the Palestinian people there, because their own leadership is more interested in using its population as human shields, launching rockets against Israel from within major civilian centers.

Don't lecture Israel on international sympathy Mr. Hague. Not when Israel targets, with as much military precision as it can, only terrorists and their bases, trying its utmost to prevent civilian casualties.

Don't lecture Israel on international sympathy Mr. Hague. Not when the Palestinian media deliberately uses images of victims of the Syrian civil war and presents them as casualties in Gaza to gain international sympathy.

Go read your history books Mr. Hague, go see that since the beginning of the twentieth century all the Arabs wanted to do was destroy Israel.

Go look at the country of Israel now since the Jews have established a state there.

Go read what advances in science, medicine, biotechnology,
agriculture and high tech Israel has developed, and dedicated that
knowledge to making the world a better place for humanity. Can you
imagine any other country that after 60 years of continuously being under attack could have achieved so much.

So Mr. Hague don't lecture Israel on international sympathy. Israel will do whatever it takes to defend itself from outright attack on its citizens, whether it be from Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran or any other country or terrorist group that attacks it.

And if it loses the sympathy of the international community so be it.

We don't need the international community's sympathy. We don't need another 6 million victims.

[Dr. Adi Schwartz @Adi_Schwartz]

The debate on Gaza’s future is built on a fundamental mistake: prioritizing reconstruction over the nature of the society it creates. Rebuilding infrastructure while leaving the ideas and institutions that fueled war intact simply sets the clock for the next conflict. Reconstruction is never neutral - it either builds peace or powers war.
Deradicalization can't wait. Access to rebuilding must be the primary leverage for political change.
The rule is simple: no reconstruction without political change.

[Alastair Hilton @London_W4]

And now I’m here in Trafalgar Square in London on this gorgeous Monday morning. For nearly two hundred years, this square has been open, but because of the recent mental health condition that affects Muslims, causing them to shout Allahu Akbar before driving their vehicles into crowds of innocent people to kill them, we have to have these barriers. Here and on every bridge in London. Every single public place. Because solving the mental health condition would be very difficult so this is how we have to live now. Remember though boys and girls: diversity is our strength.

[Captain Allen @CptAllenHistory]

Jews are the only people in the world who still speak, read, write, and pray in the same language their ancestors used 3,000 years ago in the exact same land.

[Ted S @ClearReason]

Israel has Muslim soldiers, judges and legislators.

Most of its neighbors barely have Jews.

Guess which society gets called apartheid.

[Vivid.🇮🇱 @VividProwess]

“Last year alone, Muslims kiIIled 500,000 Christians in only Nigeria. Why are they only talking about Palestine?"

He is 100% correct.

[Stephen Pollard @stephenpollard]

Here's my @Telegraph column, 'Restore Britain’s talk of Gaza ‘genocide’ is as ridiculous as the Left’s'

https://t.co/lyUjowBFtZ

The accusation that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza is the gravest accusation that can be made against any nation – and also, as Howard Jacobson has pointed out, the most sadistic that can be made against Israel in particular, because it deliberately shifts the Jews from historical victims of genocide to being perpetrators.

That is why those who use it are either ignorant or malign – or, as in the case of Charlie Downes, campaign director and co-founder of far-Right party Restore Britain, both. Downes has a long history of using anti-semitic tropes (not least in his latest suggestion that “the Jews” have “bought” Nigel Farage). As Jacobson has put it: “There is a sadistic triumphalism in charging Jews with genocide, as though those making it feel they have their man at last.”

Hitler first wrote about the “big lie” in Mein Kampf – the idea that ordinary people are more likely to fall for a huge, outrageous lie than a small, subtle one. The genocide lie is a typical example of this. Examine each of its constituent parts and the accusation falls apart. But that is rarely done – instead, the big genocide lie is repeated ad nauseam by those who seek to destroy Israel until it becomes almost an accepted fact by those who have never heard the detailed facts that disprove it.

Take the accusation that Israel has been starving the population of Gaza, largely based on the August 2025 report of the UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) of Famine Review Committee (FRC). There was no local data so the IPC used an estimate.

But a new report using the most recent figures provided by Unicef, WHO, and the World Bank (based off acute malnutrition by weight for height for children under five years old) shows that in the UK the figure is 0.4 per cent, in Germany 0.5 per cent, in Egypt 3.3 per cent and Iran 4.3 per cent. In Gaza, according to Unicef, the figure is between 0.2 per cent and 0.8 per cent.

If that seems counter-intuitive it is because the central argument that Israel was starving Gazans is false. According to the coordinator of government activities in the territories (Cogat), the body which oversees civilian and humanitarian coordination in the West Bank and Gaza, 1.01m tonnes entered Gaza between October 7, 2023 and January 17, 2025 against an estimated need of 825,000 tonnes. Between the October 2025 ceasefire and June 7, 2026, 1.78m tonnes entered Gaza against a need of 643,000. It did not all reach those who needed it, not least because Hamas took much of it, but the idea that there was a starvation policy by Israel falls apart on the figures.

Similarly the assertion that over 70 per cent of those who have died are women and children has no basis in fact. The Gaza health ministry’s own figures last month had 71,444 identified fatalities in total. The UN’s own Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) – hardly sympathetic to Israel – held that 45.2 per cent of the dead were woman and children. The casualty figures are skewed heavily towards men of fighting age.

Before the war, adult men made up 25 per cent of the population. With adult men making up over 50 per cent of those killed, the idea that Israel simply killed for the sake of killing also falls apart, not least as many of those men killed will have been combatants. (And, for good measure, the claim of hundreds of thousands lying dead in the rubble as made by the Lancet has never once been verified – and will not be. For one thing, there has been a significant financial incentive to Gazans to report missing family members).

The notion that Israel targeted hospitals for the sake of it has also been destroyed. It is now well documented that Hamas used al-Shifa hospital as a command centre and to store weapons and hostages.

As for the labelling of genocide by academics – the ‘finding’ by the International Association of Genocide Scholars was made in a vote in which only 28 per cent of members voted, and it turns out that anyone can join on payment of a fee. It is a worthless finding.

And so is the supposed finding by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) of ‘plausible genocide’, often cited by those claiming genocide. It is worthless because the ICJ has never made such a finding, as former ICJ President Joan Donoghue told the BBC. Rather, it found that Palestinians in Gaza have a “plausible right” to be protected from genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention and thus South Africa had the right to present its claim. The ICJ made no finding on the issue of whether there has been a genocide.

All of this is without even considering the notion of intent, and genocide requires state intent. Gaza has experienced a terrible tragedy and appalling killing, but that is a consequence of war – and the Gaza War was brought about by Hamas’s massacre of October 7, 2023. Had there been no massacre there would have been no war.

But once Israel was engaged in the conflict, it had to deal with the reality built by Hamas, of a network of tunnels, houses and tower blocks used to conceal weapons and fighters, hospitals used as command centres and a civilian population deliberately excluded from protection by their Hamas government.

Indeed, Israel has gone out of its way to protect Gazans, alerting residents to military action where possible.

Far from being accused of genocide, Israel should be praised for the extreme humanitarian care it has taken in its existential fight against terrorists out to destroy it.

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 WOW. This brave Christian migrant from Iran walked up and WENT BERSERK on the proposed Islamic Center in McKinney, TX — straight to the council's face

The whole building ERUPTED after his dire warning:

"I'm a Sharia law survivor from Iran."

"I'm TELLING YOU, this is a BAD idea and you're going to REGRET not listening to people like us who lived under Sharia law!"

"I'm here to tell you this is a DANGEROUS ideology you're allowing in your country. Every country that is Islamic now, it used to be a Christian country and we were soft Christians."

"And we allowed these people to come in, bring their Sharia law into our countries and slowly k*ll us off left and right!"

"Let me make it very clear to you. Christianity is a personal relationship with God...Islam is Sharia law. Religion and state, which is not even compatible with the American thing and when these people will lie to you, to manipulate you."

"Because whenever Islam is little, they will lie to you and tell you they come in peace. This is level one!"

"Level two is what's happening in UK right now, where you have two-tier policing, where you have the blasphemy laws, Islamophobia, racism, all this nonsense that they talk about."

"Any time you criticize Islam, they will use the race card, but every country has this disgusting ideology inside their country, including my own country, Iran, Russia, Islamophobia is another made up bullsh*t because they don't want you to criticize their death cult!"

"If you question that disgusting book, they're get k*lled over it, just like my friends were apostates imprisoned or dead right now in Iran!"

HE NAILED IT!!!

[Laura✡️Marcus @MissLauraMarcus]

Regarding all this talk about how the triple lock is unaffordable and too much money is going to older people in Britain…
I’m 70 and only get the full state pension which is £965 every four weeks. So £1,045 every calendar month; £240 a week.
If I just stick to essentials, I can just about manage.
I’m aware the country can’t afford to keep paying me so much money. In years gone by, I’d be living in abject poverty. Why didn’t I have a private pension? Self employment. Erratic income. My fault for not being a higher earner? I got by. I never had enough for savings nor a pension scheme.
I’m aware of the issues but from where I sit, I just don’t care. Why should I? That’s what you have to ask. Why should those of us just barely getting by on the state pension care if it can’t be afforded? People don’t worry about the big picture when just about surviving is all they can think of.
I’m a baby boomer and my generation gets blamed for a lot. But I’m not aware of ever doing owt that created this situation. Not all baby boomers are rich. Not all did well. We’re a massive cohort. And there’s now naff all my generation can do to make the situation any better. Except die of course. So sorry for being healthy, fit and strong!
I’m immensely grateful for my £965 every four weeks. When you’ve been self employed and never knew when - or even if! - you’d get paid, getting regular money is for me still an incredible novelty.

[ראש ממשלת ישראל @IsraeliPM_heb]

ראש הממשלה בנימין נתניהו בפתח ישיבת הממשלה:
"בוודאי שמתם לב לנקודה מעניינת - איראן תוקפת את כל המדינות באזור, אפילו מחוץ לאזור, אבל יש מדינה אחת שהיא לא תוקפת - את מדינת ישראל. עד כה היא לא תקפה, יכול להיות שתתקוף, אבל למה עברו שבועות ארוכים והיא לא תוקפת אותנו? משום שהיא יודעת איזה מכה עצימה אנחנו ננחית עליה אם היא תעשה את זה.

אני אומר את זה כי לאחרונה, ביומיים האחרונים, אנחנו מוצפים בגל שמועות על חולשה ישראלית ועל נסיגות ישראליות בכל החזיתות. הדבר הכי משעשע הוא שההתקפות הללו באות מאנשים שהטיפו לסגת מכל רצועת עזה, לא להיכנס בכלל ללבנון ולא להכות באיראן. אז אני מבקש לעבור אתכם בקצרה חזית חזית.

קודם כל איראן - אני מאוד מעריך את הנשיא טראמפ. הוא גדול ידידינו בבית הלבן. אני מאוד מעריך את השותפות ההיסטורית עם ארצות הברית נגד הניסיונות של איראן להתחמש בנשק גרעיני. ואני רוצה להדגיש שוב: עם הסכם או בלי הסכם, כל עוד אני ראש ממשלה לאיראן לא יהיה נשק גרעיני. כי הקיום של המדינה היקרה שלנו, המדינה של כולנו, הקיום של ישראל, אינו עומד למשא ומתן.

לגבי לבנון - גם בלבנון אנחנו שומעים כל מיני שמועות. אני רוצה להבהיר: בימים האחרונים ישראל פעלה בעוצמה בלבנון, חיסלה מחבלים, כולל ברכס עלי טאהר. אני לא יכול לפרט את זה. אנחנו בתוך פעילות חשובה מאוד. אנחנו עובדים בשום שכל ובתבונה. גם בנחישות וגם בתבונה עם צבא ההגנה לישראל ומחסלים איומים.

באשר לרצועת עזה - קודם כל אני רוצה להבהיר את הדבר העיקרי: כל עוד אני ראש ממשלה, לא תקום מדינה פלסטינית - לא בעזה ולא ביו"ש. לא ׳פת"חסטן׳ ולא ׳חמאסטן׳.

באשר לדברים ספציפיים שעולים בחדשות לאחרונה, אני רוצה לדייק כאן: ישראל שוללת את מסמך 15 הנקודות.
שמעתי שאומרים: ׳לא אמרתם׳. אז הנה אני אומר עוד פעם: ישראל שוללת את מסמך 15 הנקודות. צה"ל לא יבצע נסיגה כלשהי עד פירוק החמאס מנשקו. וכשאני אומר פירוק החמאס מנשקו, זה אומר הנשק הכבד, הנשק הפחות כבד, כל הנשק. ואנחנו מדברים על פירוק אמיתי, לא פירוק פיקטיבי. עכשיו אנחנו מדברים עם האמריקאים על הנושא הזה. יש להם רעיונות, חלק מהם מקובלים עלינו וחלק לא מקובלים עלינו, ואנחנו יודעים לעמוד מול הדברים האלה. הוכחנו את זה בעבר ואנחנו מוכיחים את זה גם היום. בנוסף, צה"ל ימשיך לסכל את האיומים נגד כוחותינו ונגד אזרחינו.

הקיום של ישראל והביטחון של כל אזרחי ישראל אינו עומד למשא ומתן. אנחנו עומדים איתן על האינטרסים הללו. אנחנו עושים את זה לא במשרדי פרסום, אנחנו עושים את זה באמת בשטח. אנחנו הוכחנו את זה כל הזמן כשנכנסנו לרפיח, ולציר פילדלפי, כשנכנסנו ללבנון וחיסלנו שם את נסראללה ואת מאגר הרקטות, כשתקפנו את איראן פעמיים. בניגוד לכל אלה שמטיפים לנו, אנחנו עושים את מה שצריך לעשות למען ביטחון ישראל ואנחנו יכולים ויודעים לעמוד על שלנו גם מול הידידים הטובים ביותר שלנו כשצריך."

וידאו: רועי אברהם / לע״מ
סאונד: יחזקאל קנדיל / לע״מ

[AP @Average_NY_Guy]

It’s actually quite insulting that, as a Jew, people immediately assume my issue with Hasan Piker, Mamdani, and El-Sayed must be about Judaism or Israel.

Their views on Israel are almost beside the point to me.

My issue with them is their hatred toward the values America and the West stand for, and toward the very idea of America as a beacon of freedom.

I don’t oppose them because I’m Jewish. I oppose them because I’m American.

And frankly, the fact that so many people think their main problem is their views on Israel and Jews is perhaps the most concerning part of all.

It’s burying your head in the sand. It reduces a much bigger problem to just a “Jewish issue” and allows the other 99% of their awful beliefs to escape scrutiny.

[John Spencer @SpencerGuard]

Wow. I try not to get surprised by X. But “There’s no example in history of DDR working when one side insists on the other’s total surrender first.” Crazy.

Except Germany and Japan 1945. Ethiopia 1991. The Confederacy 1865. Multiple other examples of victory over the enemy.

The idea that total victory in war shouldn’t be the goal is the ahistorical part. Of course it should be and in Gaza that means exactly what the Trump 20-point plan states: complete disarmament and surrender of power in the Strip. Anything less just guarantees continued violence, instability, and suffering at the hands of Hamas in Gaza.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Reform and Nigel Farage have finally made a response to our offer in the Daily Telegraph - I will go through their four conditions…

The Reform Chairman, Lee Anderson, has said Reform will not step aside in any constituencies. Reform should ‘always’ be on the ballot paper.

Meaning that Reform plan to run in every seat, even if there is an arrangement. This is not a constructive start.

I have been realistic. Clearly, the whole point of any arrangement would be not to divide the electoral force. That would mean certain Restore Britain candidates standing aside to ensure a sensible and pragmatic approach to our voting system.

If Reform are not willing to reciprocate in any constituencies, any at all, the offer I have made is entirely redundant.

They have also said we must endorse Farage to be Prime Minister, and allow the failed Conservative ministers to again be part of a future cabinet.

Contrary to reports, I have never said that Reform must dump anybody. That is not my place to do so. It is their party, it is entirely Reform’s choice who they run to be MPs or employ - it is putting these same ministers who failed Britain into a future cabinet which Restore Britain has helped to empower that I take issue with. Restore Britain will not be responsible for handing Nadhim Zahawi, Nadine Dorries and others some of the most powerful jobs in the country.

Farage and Reform have also said that Restore Britain must outright sack Charlie Downes - putting a young Christian man out of work, just as he is looking to build his life and start a family.

That is simply not how I operate.

But I want to be clear - if a sensible reciprocal arrangement can be found on our proposed policy platform, we would be willing to stand our Restore Britain candidates aside in certain seats in order to defeat the left-wing alliance. For any political party, that is a big step to make - country before party.

Reform have just outright rejected doing the same. If that position continues, then this whole exercise is futile.

A deal will mean give and take on both sides. I’ve been in business long enough to know that.

Our original offer was focused on policy, their response is about personality.

After all of the bad blood, if we focus on personality and ego, we will get nowhere. That much is obvious from the last seven days.

Our papers on economics, energy, deportations, policing and much more show exactly what can be delivered - properly considered policy must be central to everything.

The place to start this negotiation is on policy. Find common ground, sort out the clear differences, build on that and go from there.

Restore Britain remains open to good faith talks where both parties understand the brutal electoral reality we are facing.