@grok@Hugo_Clairvaux@NEocrusader01 Regularizar sua situação.
Processo de excomunhão não é feito de qualquer forma, inquisição se vc estudar os hereges eram chamados a conversão, 1 , 2 , 3 vezes se possível, depois a pena.
Não existe um Papa estilo Harry Potter jogando o poder da excomunhão sem um processo
@Hugo_Clairvaux@NEocrusader01 Tem um vídeo, se não me engano na Nicarágua, Padre comunista chega perto de São João Paulo ll e ele dá uma bronca no Padre, ambiente extremamente hostil, salão parecia uma convenção do mst .
@grok tem o link desse vídeo?
@mamacitagospel@Paulofvs@grok China fez o controle de natalidade, tem um país envelhecido e com a população feminina bem reduzida, pois quando descobria o sexo o aborto era usado conforme a vontade ( tipo escolher um bicho no pet-shop.
O estado tem que proteger o nascituro, não se faz uma nação sem filhos.
How did Lula go from prison to becoming eligible to run for president again?
The answer involves three distinct judicial decisions. The chronology matters.
In 2018, Lula’s corruption and money laundering conviction had been upheld on appeal. He began serving his sentence, and the electoral court barred his presidential candidacy under Brazil’s Clean Record Law, which disqualifies candidates with certain convictions upheld by a judicial panel.
First came his release. On November 7, 2019, the Supreme Court (STF) voted 6–5 to prohibit imprisonment solely to begin serving a sentence before appeals were exhausted. The ruling applied generally, beyond Lula’s case, with the exception of @jairbolsonaro who was immediately jailed with total disregard to the rule that was created for Lula. Lula walked out of prison the following day. His conviction remained in place, and he was still ineligible to run.
Then came the restoration of eligibility. On March 8, 2021, Justice Edson Fachin annulled the decisions in four Lula proceedings, including his convictions, because the district level federal court “lacked jurisdiction” over those cases. Fachin ordered them transferred to another court. With the convictions annulled, the basis for Lula’s electoral disqualification fell away. The full Supreme Court upheld Fachin’s decision, 8–3, on April 15, 2021.
Separately, on March 23, 2021, the STF ruled, 3–2, that the trial judge had been biased in convicting Lula, invalidating the judge’s acts in that case. Can you imagine if Alexandre de Moraes could have his decisions annulled on the basis of being “biased”?
These distinctions are essential. Release pending appeal did not restore eligibility. Annulment for lack of jurisdiction did. The finding of judicial bias provided a separate ground for invalidating the proceedings.
The decisions that reopened Lula’s path to the presidency were not acquittals on the underlying corruption allegations.
That’s how they did it in Brazil. What do you think they’re planning in Argentina next year?
@ThiagoS81932656@cafecomtradicao Sábias palavras do Padre Paulo Ricardo...
Bíblia foi feita por católicos e para católicos.
Fora disso é heresia ou gritaria histérica de protestante, tem vertentes protestante que nem merecem ser chamados de heréticos.
@SimonLevyMx Aqui no Brasil tem um inquérito ( chamado inquérito do fim do mundo) aberto pra perseguir até jornalistas, blogs, ceiadores de conteúdo.
Ninguém tem acesso ao inquérito, apenas o juiz perseguidor
@RenatoDoBrasil1@NEocrusader01 Eu questionei a afirmação que a igreja nunca perseguiu a TL mais que a FSSPX.
Vídeo é mais do mesmo, modernismo/liberal de alguns padres.