@SophieM97713317@frankinsensible@FRETfulWoman@EHRC Funny how the number of consultation responses were way higher than the number of members? And isn’t it also funny that the percentage who claim to be LGBTQIFDgHfrTgHh++* was so much higher than in the general public? Almost like it is not representative and has been hijacked. 🤭
Except the next part says that there are exceptions. Primogeniture, parent status on birth certificate and where the GRA clashes with other legislation.
A reminder of what the Gender Recognition Act 2004 - passed by Parliament just six years prior to Gordon Brown’s alleged Bathroom Bill - says:
““(1) Where a full gender recognition certificate is issued to a person, the person’s gender becomes FOR ALL PURPOSES the acquired gender (so that, if the acquired gender is the male gender, the person’s SEX becomes that of a man and, if it is the female gender, the person’s SEX becomes that of a woman).”
The Gender Recognition Act settled trans women ARE women. The EA 2010 never contradicted that. Preposterous. Also, the EA does not mention the gender critical phrase “biological sex” - first mentioned by Lord Hodge last April. In the summing up written for him by the @EHRC and the GCs.
@NymphieJP@Naeluckmate@BBCLondonNews Ah so you’re also dismissing the results of the consultation. As there were far more responses than there are members. Glad you agree.
@cityoflondon@GenderReceipts Inclusive? Which pool can be used by Muslim or orthodox Jewish women, who are not allowed to be in a state of undress around men? Seriously, where do they go? I will tell you: they go home to their, bcs of you, smaller lives. Your smugness is revolting, as I'm sure you intended.
@nobody22722@Enoughnow73 The laws were and are settled. The Supreme Court confirmed that the Intepretation of them pushed by Stonewall et al was incorrect. HTH