Bhallal Dev

Engineer @salesforce

[The Telegraph @Telegraph]

Narendra Modi has been accused of striking millions of Muslims from the electoral roll, triggering widespread protests against his government.

Our correspondent in the region explains everything going on ⤵️
https://t.co/AQoQjsMek5

[RichaChadha @RichaChadha]

What if someone appeals to citizens to not pay taxes and citizens listen ? Their salaries come from our taxes right ? 😮

[Vir Das @thevirdas]

There is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come - Victor Hugo

There is nothing more dangerous than an ideology whose time is coming to an end - You decide.

[Ayushi Kar @ayushikar1998]

We reported two days ago that UP added 16.18 lakh mysterious voters to the electoral rolls during SIR.

UP CEO countered that ECI rules made them do it.

We dug more and found that he lied

Read our story for @reporters_co

https://t.co/9NzcYhuuR3

[Live Law @LiveLawIndia]

Cost Of Supreme Court's 2-Year-Plus Delay In Deciding CEC Appointment Case |@DebbyJain

The petitions challenging the CEC Act have remained pending since January 2024. Gyanesh Kumar was the first CEC to be appointed as per this law.

https://t.co/3ciyLoeu9l

[Cockroach Janta Party - CJP @Cockroachisback]

The government may use every intimidation tactic, but we will not back down.

CJP stands firm on its three demands. They are NON-NEGOTIABLE:

1. Gyanesh Kumar must resign, and criminal proceedings must be initiated against him.

2. Freeze SIR, halt upcoming elections, restore the January 2025 voters list, and order an independent inquiry.

3. Repeal the 2023 ECI appointments law and establish an independent, credible selection process.

[Supriya Shrinate @SupriyaShrinate]

Dhappa 🔥

[the reporters' collective @reporters_co]

The mysterious 16.8 lakh voters added to Uttar Pradesh’s voter rolls.

Law requires ECI to put out details of all Form 6 applications for addition. We found ECI has hidden the identity of 16.8 lakh voters.

@ayushikar1998 and @tweetsumedha report.

1/4
https://t.co/ScmXHXg2xM

[Dhruv Rathee @dhruv_rathee]

Yet another evidence of why everyone should be protesting against Gyanesh Kumar

Read 👇

[Congress @INCIndia]

वोट चोरों के खिलाफ खड़ा है INDIA ✊

[Helle Lyng @HelleLyngSvends]

Sudhir, I think you need to go out there and talk to people. That studio wears you out.

[RichaChadha @RichaChadha]

Do we need blended petrol more than life itself ? Is there life without water ?

[The DeshBhakt 🇮🇳 Akash Banerjee @TheDeshBhakt]

Maintaining order matters, so does the rule book.
Guidelines for police personnel.
.
#DeshbhaktUpdates
#EthicsofPolicing

[Javed Akhtar @Javedakhtarjadu]

I Javed Akhtar want to tell every one that the fake message on the social media that I have criticised CJP and run down Abhijeet Dipke is as fake as fake can be . I am surprised that those who are opposing Dipke and CJP need to borrow credibility from some one like me !! . Yeh Haalut hogayee hai ??? . Sad

[Abhijeet Dipke @abhijeet_dipke]

Not enough!

Anything found to be not in accordance with the law is called “illegal,” and the person responsible must be charged accordingly.

[Ritika Chopra @RitikaChopra__]

Can't serve notices.

Can't hold virtual hearings.

Can't give a voter a copy of the order deleting them.

And: "Once the appeal is disposed of... it cannot be restored on the portal if the restoration is needed on account of direction of the judicial order or otherwise."

That's not a complaint from an election official on the ground. It's the minutes of a meeting of retired High Court judges, appointed on the Supreme Court's orders to hear 38 lakh SIR appeals in West Bengal, on the portal the Election Commission's IT division (headed by Seema Khanna) built for them.

Minutes dated August 11, sent to the EC and the Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court.

Cracker of a story by @DaminiNath & @mitra_atri

https://t.co/rPUlXlI6HM via @IndianExpress

[Krishna Yadav @Control_Krishna]

Why is this video so damn satisfying to watch? 😭🔥

[Cockroach Janta Party - CJP @Cockroachisback]

On September 26, the Election Commission said in a press release that the SIR declaration attached to Form 6 had been upheld by the Supreme Court.

Today, the CJI made it clear: “Any modified Form 6 has not been approved by us.”

If the Supreme Court did not approve this modified Form 6, why did the ECI claim it did?

The ECI owes the country an answer.

[🚨Indian Gems @IndianGems_]

"Except for death, a Voter name cannot be deleted from the voter list without notice and a hearing. Yours Whataboutery cannot justify disenfranchising millions."

— Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, Supreme Court