DOTTORE 🏴 🇰🇵

National revolutionary🏴‍☠️/solipsist

historian of the third position ⚔️

🖤 I like: art, books,poetry, music,anime, movies,videogamer and theology.

[DOTTORE 🏴 🇰🇵 @Voiddottore]

🧵all my threads

[AG @hfsd29497878]

“Mussolini representa el ideal de líder que unifica nación, elimina debilidad interna y proyecta poder exterior.”

- Ryōichi Sasakawa, empresario fascista japonés

[男性器 @ztaOVtT1Bj52903]

吾等の信ずるところによれば、改造の原理は之を内に求むべくして外に求むべきではない。それ故に日本の改造とは取りも直さず純乎として純なる日本へ復帰することであります。日本国家は天地と共に無限なるべき荘厳なる生命である。

[Matheus 🇧🇷🇮🇹🇷🇺🇺🇦ꖦ @KrulTepesOfc]

“The rise of National Socialism is the protest of a people against a State that denies the right to work.”

— 𝐆𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐨𝐫 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐫

[AG @hfsd29497878]

The Patrianovists (or Brazilian Imperial Patrianovist Action - AIPB), also known simply as Patrianovism or Pátria Nova, were a Brazilian monarchist, Catholic, and third position nationalist movement that emerged in the late 1920s in São Paulo, amid the crisis of the First Republic, the 1930 Revolution, and the surge of authoritarian, anticommunist, and antiliberal ideas across Latin America. Founded by Arlindo Veiga dos Santos —a poet, intellectual, and Black Brazilian activist—, it combined traditionalist monarchism, corporatism, integral Catholicism, and fascist elements with a strong organic nationalism inspired by the Luso-Brazilian tradition and the country’s imperial history.

It was formally organized in March 1928 as the Monarchist Center for Social and Political Culture Pátria Nova (the embryo of the movement), linked to the Centro Dom Vital and Jackson de Figueiredo’s magazine A Ordem. In 1932 it consolidated as the Brazilian Imperial Patrianovist Action, with a presence in several states and an active paramilitary branch until its dissolution in 1937 (following Getúlio Vargas’s Estado Novo coup), though it briefly resurfaced after 1945.

Patrianovism consisted of:
- Recruiting young Catholic intellectuals, university students, and middle-class conservative sectors around the magazine Pátria Nova and study circles to promote the restoration of a traditional monarchy, rejecting the liberal republicanism inherited from 1889 and parliamentary democracy as imported and decadent systems.
- Rejecting “materialist and Masonic” liberalism and atheistic Marxism, while defending an “Organic Empire” based on obligatory Catholic faith, trade corporations, municipalism, and a hierarchical, corporatist structure that prioritized “God, Fatherland, Family, and Monarchy.”
- Mobilizing its followers through propaganda, conferences, demonstrations, and a paramilitary guard (the Imperial Patrianovist Guard or “White Shirts”) to defend Catholic national identity against communism and liberalism, gaining influence in right-wing circles even if it never reached the critical mass of movements like Plínio Salgado’s Integralism.
- Influencing conservative and Catholic political debate in Brazil, temporarily collaborating with the Integralists while maintaining its independent monarchist stance, and positioning itself as the “pure” and traditionalist alternative to republican parties and the emerging left.
- Adopting a distinctive and provocative style: fully white paramilitary uniforms (in contrast to the green shirts of the Integralists), imperial symbols, speeches filled with references to Brazilian history and Luso-Catholic heritage, and an image of discipline, tradition, and total rejection of liberal modernity, projecting a charismatic leadership centered on the figure of Veiga dos Santos.

[Henrique 🇧🇷🇮🇹🏴‍☠️ꖦ @HenriqueI777]

“Ideologically,Fascist Italy was isolated from the Anglo-Saxon and Soviet worlds.This would not have suited it in the slightest,having arisen precisely in opposition to the two-faced Janus of materialism: plutocracy and communism.”

—Mussolini, Corrispondenza Repubblicana, 1944

[Alianza Nacional Patriótica❤️‍🔥 @ANPVE]

«El General Sucre es el Padre de Ayacucho: es el redentor de los hijos del Sol; es el que ha roto las cadenas con que envolvió Pizarro el imperio de los Incas».

General Simón Bolivar el Libertador.

196° aniversario del Magnicidio contra el Gran Mariscal Antonio José de Sucre.

[Matheus 🇧🇷🇮🇹🇷🇺🇺🇦ꖦ @KrulTepesOfc]

“We don't knock on any doors. We have only opened the door that has introduced us, for several years, to the rejection of modern materialism, in its most diabolical manifestations: capitalism and Marxist socialism”

— Franco Freda

[AG @hfsd29497878]

"Hay quienes sostienen que el nacionalsocialismo y el fascismo son incompatibles con nuestro carácter nacional, pero yo creo que la resolución humana para superar la adversidad es, en el fondo, de ninguna manera diferente, ya sea en Alemania, Italia o Japón."

- Seigō Nakano, líder de Tōhōkai

[AG @hfsd29497878]

“La defensa de Palestina es también una lucha contra las garras globalistas de la Internacional Sionista.”

- Roger Coudroy

[Henrique 🇧🇷🇮🇹🏴‍☠️ꖦ @HenriqueI777]

“Nationalism is the instrument of war for workers against exploiters, for the oppressed against their oppressors.”

—François Duprat

[Matheus 🇧🇷🇮🇹🇷🇺🇺🇦ꖦ @KrulTepesOfc]

"We are Fascists, because we find our origins in Mussolinian principles; we are Nazis, because in National Socialist doctrines vibrate our faith and doctrine. But we are, above all, Spaniards. The National Syndicalist State, corporative and totalitarian, is of Spanish type.

[Zoran Zoltanous 𒉭 🔻 @ZoranZoltanous]

In 1932, Ugo Spirito proposed turning Fascist corporations into genuine worker-and-manager-owned enterprises, transferring ownership from absentee shareholders to the actual producers. A radical vision rooted in actualism that even Bottai rejected as going “outside corporatism.”

https://t.co/O1jXboMY86

[Ronald Christ @RonaldCHRIST12]

“This radical Right fairy-tale, which is now an accepted folk myth in many groups in America, pictured the recent history of the United States, in regard to domestic reform and foreign affairs, as a well organised plot by extreme Left-wing elements, operating from the White House itself and controlling all the chief avenues of publicity in the United States, to destroy the American way of life, based on private enterprise, laissez faire, and isolationism, in behalf of the ideologies of Russian Socialism and British cosmopolitanism (or internationalism) […]

This myth, like all fables, does in fact have a modicum of truth. There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the Radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups and frequently does so.”

Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope

[Space Cat Press @spacecatpressV1]

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐒𝐒 𝐎𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐆𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐋 𝐅𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐃𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐎𝐅 𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐌 (𝐄𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐃𝐄𝐃)

The German Reich and Volk rightly considered Americanism & America to be a great danger to the existence and prosperity of not only Germany but of Europe. America with its allies in Britain, Russia and France had inflicted onto it a 535 Article Treaty which caused the German Volk economic, social and civil peril that brought about the infamous hyperinflation and degeneration of the Weimar Republic that many Americans today qoute so often.

Their underlying mistake is thinking that it was just the Jews who inflicted this peril onto Germany, what they do not understand is that America and its ideological concepts also inflicted this, recognizing that the Jews are not the only culprit in the infliction of their subversion of nations and the world...

The following excerpts regarding the ideological foundations of Americanism are from the 1943 SS publication 𝘼𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙠𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙨𝙢𝙪𝙨 – 𝙀𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙒𝙚𝙡𝙩𝙜𝙚𝙛𝙖𝙝𝙧 or 𝘼𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙨𝙢 - 𝘼 𝙒𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙 𝘿𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙧 written by the Reichsführer-SS 𝙃𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙝 𝙃𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙡𝙚𝙧 and published by the 𝙎𝙎 𝙃𝙖𝙪𝙥𝙩𝙖𝙢𝙥𝙩 or 𝙎𝙎 𝙈𝙖𝙞𝙣 𝙊𝙛𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙚

---
𝘼𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙨𝙢 - 𝘼 𝙒𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙 𝘿𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙧

❝ The idea of a brotherhood of mankind and of world peace stood alongside a ruthless policy of conquest in Jefferson. We recall very similar contradictions in European history, when Napoleon's revolutionary
armies unfurled the banners of human brotherhood yet intended French conquest.

This comparison of seemingly contradictory political principles could easily be extended passing, to name a few key points, through Wilson's League of Nations questions and the plundering of Germany by Jewish-American capitalism, through the Rooseveltian world idea under the protection of a US world police, to the international clamor of the Bolshevists for fraternization and the simultaneous subjugation
of the world under the Jewish-Bolshevist clique.

All these seemingly ambivalent political manifestations go back to liberalism as it was developed in Western Europe — more precisely in England and France. For the USA, liberalism plays the decisive role. This worldview is of all the greater importance here because the states were founded in the era of liberalism and grounded their struggle for independence from England upon it intellectually.

Jefferson — whom we identified as the father of political thought in the States — was not without reason a minister to France, and returning filled with Western ideas, he made them the foundation of American life.

Liberalism culminates in the well-known demands that all who bear a human face are equal; that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness belong to man's inalienable rights; that the state ultimately rests only upon a contract between rulers and ruled; that it may have as little power as possible and exists only for
the benefit of individual inhabitants.

Monstrous were the conclusions drawn from these propositions:

The individual human being becomes the center of all thought — the individual stripped of all ethnic and blood ties. He knows only his own self, his own
interests, and is bound neither to a particular people nor to a particular history or past. The end-point of this line is an undifferentiated humanity independent of historical and racial essences. ❞

𝙂𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙖𝙣 𝙍𝙚𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙊𝙛 𝘼𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙄𝙙𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙨

❝ The States were a vast empty space that not only had to be filled with people but offered itself as a suitable testing ground for a purely intellectual state
construction. For here, there were no forces that could, from a naturally grown character, have rebelled against bloodless liberalism — as was the case in Europe. Where in Germany counter forces to liberalism grew from history and ethnic identity. ❞

SOURCES:

𝘼𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙠𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙨𝙢𝙪𝙨 – 𝙀𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙒𝙚𝙡𝙩𝙜𝙚𝙛𝙖𝙝𝙧

(German)
https://t.co/J5vTPIFSDF

(English)
https://t.co/kufzLR5pxL

[Europe-Action @EuroAction]

“The first two mistakes which caused the Pan-­German movement to founder were related to each other. Insufficient knowledge of the inner driving forces of great revolutions led to an insufficient estimation of the importance of the broad masses of the people; from this resulted its insufficient interest in the social question, its deficient and inadequate efforts to win the soul of the lower classes of the nation, as well as its overfavorable attitude toward parliament. If they had recognized the tremendous power which at all times must be attributed to the masses as the repository of revolutionary resistance, they would have worked differently in social and propagandist matters. Then the movement's center of gravity would not have been shifted to parliament, but to the workshop and the street.”

- Adolf Hitler

[佳宵かよい🌙 @kugu02]

並べると可愛い黒髪紅眼たち

[Multipolar Press / Constantin von Hoffmeister @constantinvonh]

"Even if it seems certain that you will lose, retaliate."

— Tsunetomo Yamamoto, 
Hagakure

[Polluxery @Polluxery]

Motoko Kusanagi

[Guilherme José @guilherme94jose]

In 1942, Carl Schmitt told Mircea Eliade that the most interesting man alive was René Guénon.

[Furioso7 @Furioso2201]

#HonkaiStarRail #HSRfanart #Yaoguang