Vorstand

RTs ≠ endorsements
born at ~330ppm
y^2 == x^3 + 7

[Vorstand @Vorstand1]

@askmadness @johanneszeller Ja, aber nicht für social media.

[Vorstand @Vorstand1]

@kettering_red @Geezy_21z @LFCNev I don't know the timing, but the direction is obvious.

[Vorstand @Vorstand1]

@askmadness @johanneszeller Damit man feststellen kann wer über 16 ist, müssen sich *alle* ausweisen.

[Vorstand @Vorstand1]

@askmadness @johanneszeller Siehe China und Iran

[Vorstand @Vorstand1]

@kettering_red @Geezy_21z @LFCNev Phones already need to be registered to a name/person/ID. Computers/tablets are next.

[Vorstand @Vorstand1]

@LN2389 @Gonzoking @Miss_Snuffy They are banning unlicensed/unauthenticated/anonymous FoS.

[Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱 @ryangerritsen]

Access to the internet should never require digital ID.
It’s almost certain that Canada will eventually implement these overreaching measures being used in the UK.
We are sleepwalking into a totalitarian state.

[Vorstand @Vorstand1]

@kettering_red @Geezy_21z @LFCNev 1. It‘s annoying that governments force people to use a VPN.
2. The government will force a digital id on every device that can use the internet. Without anonymity there is neither freedom of speech nor press freedom.

[Vorstand @Vorstand1]

@kettering_red @Geezy_21z @LFCNev https://t.co/i1DUxLpLpr

[Vorstand @Vorstand1]

@kettering_red @Geezy_21z @LFCNev Because it‘s easy to get an IP address, that is not traceable to you.

[Vorstand @Vorstand1]

@kettering_red @Geezy_21z @LFCNev Why did you ask about IP addresses?

[Vorstand @Vorstand1]

@kettering_red @Geezy_21z @LFCNev Because it‘s easy to get an IP address, that is not traceable to you.

[Vorstand @Vorstand1]

@kettering_red @Geezy_21z @LFCNev Are you familiar with VPNs?

[Vorstand @Vorstand1]

@DoubtingDeacon @highfields2020 @Miss_Snuffy You show an ID at the pub and the supermarket? I don't.

[Vorstand @Vorstand1]

@LN2389 @Gonzoking @Miss_Snuffy Because freedom of speech doesn't require a license?

[Politics UK @PolitlcsUK]

🚨 WATCH: School children react to the UK social media ban for under-16s live on BBC News

[Politics UK @PolitlcsUK]

🚨 SUMMARY: The UK's social media ban for children from early 2027:

- "User-to-user" apps where people create, share and interact with content (e.g. TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, YouTube, X, Facebook) will be banned for under-16s

- WhatsApp, Signal and YouTube Kids will be exempt

- Under-16s will also be banned from livestreaming, messaging strangers on gaming apps like Discord and using disappearing messages

- 16 and 17 year olds will face nightly social media curfews and limits on infinite scrolling with more details next month

- AI "romantic companion" chatbots will be banned for under-18s

- Adults can still access social media through age checks like facial recognition, digital IDs, passports and credit cards

[Vorstand @Vorstand1]

@southlondonjohn @ItsSkullss @RanTeeThree Let's just forget about "Prince" Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the former Duke of York?

[Ranty Man @RanTeeThree]

It’s important to know that the social media ban for under 16s is not a ban for under 16s.

It is a ban on *selected* social media for EVERYONE. Until you identify yourself.

[Polymarket @Polymarket]

NEW: U.K. advances proposal to force Apple, Google, Signal, & other platforms to scan private content on users’ devices — executives could face prison if they refuse.

[Polymarket @Polymarket]

JUST IN: UK Government clarifies adults will still be able to use social media by verifying their identities with digital IDs, facial recognition, passports and credit cards.