I have been meaning to stop using this account as it is my backup. I used it when I was faced with hate & harassment. My original account is 'operational'.😀 So, if you are still interested in following me, please go to @Dr_H_Pimlott Thank you!! (It remains my backup though!!)
I wonder when transphobes will start campaigning for baby boys to be removed from maternity wards for breeching the boundaries of baby girls?
Their target audience gets younger!
One minute it's "men are a danger to women." now it's "5yr old boys are a danger to 5yr old girls!"
The Globe and Mail just published an opinion piece by the American-funded Fraser Institute in which they advocated for this same type of policy in Canada
This is why Pierre Poilievre never clarifies what his proposed "payroll tax cuts" are either - they're cuts to EI and the CPP
Michael Foran is a Managing Editor of Adrian Vermeule's The New Digest. He works closely with Vermeule, & his legal scholarship focuses heavily on "Common Good Constitutionalism" & the classical legal tradition. In Vermeule’s world it is men who have all the sex based rights.
Between Pelicot, Epstein, the so-called “rape academy,” Andrew Tate, and what has long been tolerated elsewhere, I wonder how long it will take to communicate that this kind of networked, scaled, systematized sexual abuse of women by men is not an exception but a norm.
101 MPs have now signed EDM 240 - as a norm, most EDM's get a handful of signatures.
On average, just one EDM in 75 reaches 100 signatories.
That should tell you something @bphillipsonMP@Keir_Starmer@UKLabour@EHRC
https://t.co/v3phgj26Me
Just to be clear, @ABDanielleSmith
There is NOT 700 000 petition signers requesting a referendum.
There’s not even 300 000 separatist signatures. In fact, not one signature has been verified.
Your casual lies are extraordinary! And copious!!
If you took a look at The New Digest of which Freeze Peach Man of the Moment Michael Foran is a managing editor of, you’d get a much clearer idea of why the ‘gender critical’ movement bangs on about ‘sex based rights’. Spoiler alert - men come out best in Foran’s world.
A minutes silence please for the Mumsnetter who visited the Newcastle Building society local branch, only to find it "festooned with the trans flag". They are thinking of withdrawing their savings...
Truly the struggle is real..
Mentally ill ‘Christian’ arrested for having abusive anti-trans sign. The Tavistock was closed on the strength of an outrageous @BBCNewsnight smear campaign run by a terf - Hannah Barnes. In the 10 years it was open it saw over 10,000 trans patients - and received just 8 (EIGHT) complaints.
Biological female is a propaganda term and not a scientific term.
Sex has never had a biological definition written into any Australian or UK Law.
Humans are not sexually dimorphic, meaning that people fall neatly into ‘XX’ (female) and ‘XY’ (male).
Humans are bimodally distributed around XX and XY configurations but there are many other possibilities including XXY, XYY, XO (a null chromosome), and others.
The idea of a true sex is mistaken, and tries to make something incredibly complex seem simple and binary. To reduce sex to a single trait is to profoundly mischaracterise decades of research into sex biology.
The science is clear: there is no single physiological or biological marker that allows for the simple categorisation of people as male or female.
By the 1950s scientists had identified at least six markers of sex: chromosomes, gonads, hormones, secondary sex characteristics, external genitalia and internal genitalia.
So while sex is commonly thought to be straightforward, consisting of two clear categories of male and female, the breadth of human physical variance is more complex than the categories suggest.
The upshot: there are many biological markers of sex but none is decisive. Claiming that one factor is does not reflect the science of sex biology, and certainly can’t be used to determine sex.
https://t.co/cYAn3CzNLr
His lectures attracted about five people and were disrupted by a thronging mass of… two protestors.
But of course the gender critical WhatsApp group have been given their orders: make a massive drama, and blame trans folks for the fact no one wanted to listen to his drivel.
I didn't say sex segregated spaces "make no sense" If you want a sex segregated space have one, be my guest...
I said that banning trans people from toilets of their gender does not reduce violence. A view backed up by evidence.
But none of you will engage with that.
.
None of this language is new. Trans people have been calling it out for years. We’ve been dismissed and gaslit the entire time.
And now. In the past month violence against trans people has exploded.
The far right will cry when we criticize their dear leader and call out
The same evidence used by the UCI was used by @BritishCycling to justify their blanket ban of trans women. The UCI admitted in court and in their own policy that they have zero proof that shows trans women have a strength speed endurance or physique advantage over ciss female athletes.
Danielle Smith is claiming that a separatist referendum doesn't violate treaty rights and that she would be able to implement the results "constitutionally".
Last night we unpacked how ridiculous both of those claims are!
#abpoli#ableg#cdnpoli