@bethanyshondark Isn't this something between a man and wife instead of the whole world making judgements! Come on, let's get serious about serious issues!
A very sad announcement.
I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration.
In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least.
Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.
In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.
Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.”
That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.
Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."
You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.
Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.
The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.
Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail.
Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.
If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.
If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.
@megynkelly@mtracey I was a big fan of yours for several years! Now.... (exhausted) what do you care about Mark Levin! You have become petty in some of your comments on air about people who disagree with you. Degrading people's physical appearance, using the F bomb, spreading gossip! Just Done
Full episode link in comments!
In 2026, being careful about where you get your news — and who you trust — matters more than ever. Even longtime media figures like Tucker Carlson, once widely viewed as a credible voice in journalism, have shifted in ways that would have once seemed unthinkable. Jillian Michaels breaks down why critical thinking and source-checking are essential in today’s media landscape.
𝐂𝐀𝐍𝐃𝐀𝐂𝐄 𝐎𝐖𝐄𝐍𝐒 𝐇𝐀𝐒 𝐋𝐄𝐅𝐓 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐁𝐔𝐈𝐋𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆
Let's be direct about where Candace Owens is now — because conservatives deserve to know.
This week she posted a video declaring that President Trump has 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐮𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐲 betrayed America. That Tel Aviv is running Washington. That she was sickened watching him speak at Charlie Kirk's funeral. And then she pivoted to Freemasons and occult magic as an explanation for world events.
That is not conservative commentary. That is not even coherent political analysis. That is the content of a person who has traveled from the mainstream right straight through the exit marked "no return" — into the same conspiratorial territory occupied by Nick Fuentes and the rest of the crowd that is now openly rooting for Iran.
The antisemitic framing — 𝘛𝘦𝘭 𝘈𝘷𝘪𝘷 𝘪𝘴 𝘳𝘶𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘋𝘊 — is not a policy critique. It is a centuries-old conspiracy theory with a new coat of paint. The Freemasonry and occult content is not heterodox thinking. It is the kind of material that used to get people laughed off the internet and now gets amplified to millions because the algorithm rewards outrage over accuracy.
Owens built her brand as a sharp, credible Black conservative voice willing to challenge the left. Whatever that person was, she is not that anymore. The grief of losing Charlie Kirk is real and deserves acknowledgment. But grief does not explain this trajectory — and it does not excuse it.
𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐬𝐡𝐚��𝐞 𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐪𝐮𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐦. They are spreading antisemitism and conspiracy theory with a conservative aesthetic wrapper. Owens should be treated as a cautionary icon — the clearest available example of what a fallen conservative looks like. Not fringe. 𝐁𝐞𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐞. Fringe is still in the building. Candace Owens has left it entirely.
The warning label is this: whatever Candace Owens is selling right now, it is not MAGA, it is not conservatism, and it is not the truth.
@JoanCafeolai@LangmanVince No you are not evil,,, but your government is!! We can separate the difference. I don't understand the support for kids getting cut up just because they are confused. Most grow out of that stage. After surgery some regret it. Why do it at such a young?
@myfairviewlady Would that be your response to the Apostle Paul saying to "mark and avoid" a false teacher? Candace is a false teacher who is seducing people into gossip, slander, and distracting Christians from godly pursuits. Sometimes it's righteous to just "look away."
@GovernorVA You are a liar and not a moderate at all!! You are not what our founders envisioned! Yes, the President is working for me! Good luck Virgjnia, she is going to tax you to death! The lair she is!
@SallyJenki Why is it that women like you have to always put women against men... it's a narrative that you think works in every argument! As you can see by all these replies, you are not paying attention to content!!! Go USA hockey men and women!