@motivasyonhane The "if a recruiter called today, would I be confident sharing this as-is" line is the whole checklist in one question. Most people only audit their CV after the rejections, not before.
@joinLightforth Reading your own application cold is the most underrated skill on either side of the table. If the value doesn't survive a stranger skimming it in 10 seconds, it isn't on the page yet.
@NextPathAI1111 Outcomes over responsibilities, every time. "Described the job" vs "showed the impact" is the line between a stack of resumes that all read the same and the three you actually call.
@aibuilderpacks The 5-second test is the whole game. Most screening fails because the signal is buried, not because it isn't there. Half the actual job is just surfacing what someone did.
@ThatHRgirll The clearest one, every time. A long CV is usually someone who couldn't decide what mattered most about their own work. Editing is a signal.
Half my timeline this week: candidates using AI to ace interviews, recruiters panicking about it.
Banning the tools isn't the fix. Screen for how someone actually thinks with them - that's the job now, not a workaround to it.
@OriDotan This is the way π Claude Code running on two machines simultaneously = double the output. The dining table dev setup is peak #buildinpublic energy!
The smartest recruiting AI can't save a job that was wrong before it was posted.
Most tools start when the role opens. The costly mistake already happened - in the JD.
Put the agent before the post, not after. It flags the wrong level. You still make the call.
@HarvardBiz This tracks. The signals we all trained on - resume polish, interview fluency - are now the easiest to manufacture. The fix isn't more gates for recruiters to check by hand. It's surfacing what's hard to fake: real work, references, consistency over time.
Everyone's panicking that AI lets candidates fake the perfect resume and interview. The fix isn't more screening tools for recruiters to drown in. It's an agentic system that does the screening and surfaces what's real, so recruiters get their judgment back. The hire stays human.