@MartKAD what if there was a way.
take a look at what we are building.
Distribution has been one of the key topics being talked about in recently, what if there was a way to make distribution effective
https://t.co/qzkmWTNmDg
also corge ethos has always been on transparency, with our inbuilt wallet checker for projects you can now see how much wallet was allocated and has been allocated for a mint.
@Xeetbtcvox a lot of reasons; of course funds is part of it and some founders don’t really believe in their project so they overallocate just to sell out
that’s why transparency is needed in the space
that’s what we are trying to solve at corge
https://t.co/qzkmWTNmDg
also corge ethos has always been on transparency, with our inbuilt wallet checker for projects you can now see how much wallet was allocated and has been allocated for a mint.
Lots of trash projects are popping up
Trash collab managers
Trash Scammers & hackers
Trash wannabe kols
Trash cash grabbers
Trash AI art slops
Don't give trash your money
Don't support trash people & trash projects.
I’m going to be way more aggressive with upcoming paid trash mints.
Even the “cheap” ones.
I’d rather use my money to support real builders & artists.
Fuck trash
@mikesnft you can do that with @corgeapp
you can limit your WL distribution to one per twitter account or discord account
everything is in the creators hand
most nft projects don’t fail because the art was bad or the market was cold. they fail because the wrong people got in.
price, timing, community, connections all of this matters. but DISTRIBUTION is the one that quietly decides everything else. you can have the best founder in the space and still watch your floor collapse because 40% of your minters don’t appreciate your work.
that’s the problem corge was built to fix. effective distribution before the mint, not after the damage.
ran @404_identities through corge analytics system. shoutout to @itsdizcorvus genuinely one of the better builders doing it right now, made gtd to be gtd and fcfs catchable, and this collection has the bones to last. but the numbers tell a specific story.
45% of minters came in with a wallet label below normal. 36% were flagged as jeet or paper hands. that’s a distribution problem right there.
does that explain where the floor is sitting now? probably some of it. better wallet quality at mint doesn’t guarantee a moon, but it gives you a fighting chance. price action is partly just who you let in.
with a founder this solid, this collection deserved a cleaner start. corge would’ve caught it.
(Unconfirmed information)
https://t.co/O7oEaZRQ8a
Possibly a full public mint from @Troll_ (token ATH mcap: $240M)
What raised concerns for me so far:
1. The collection now has a verification checkmark on OpenSea (it wasn't there yesterday)
2. There has been no official confirmation from the team
3. The website looks unofficial; however, it was posted by a team member on January 23
4. The X account linked on the website is the old one
I'm waiting for official confirmation from team members