WEFocusUSA

My ppl helped settled the Lone Star State and I’m doing my best to protect it. Sincerely MAGA. ❤️Jesus. NO: DM’s, perverts, crypto - NO BULLSHIT.

[Astute Actual @AstuteActual]

"It's OK. It's just biological tissue."
"It's OK. It's just an embryo."
"It's OK. It couldn't survive outside of the womb."
"It's OK. It doesn't even have a birth certificate."
"It's OK. I was over-medicated and not in my right mind."
What will be their next excuse for murder?

[NewsTreason Channel 17 @NewsTreason]

🚨 THIS STORY JUST BECAME EVEN MORE RELEVANT

Remember the extraordinary parallels we just uncovered between Deirdre Morley in Ireland and Lindsay Clancy in Massachusetts?

Well, there’s another piece—and it happened THIS YEAR.

On January 19, 2026, Andrew McGinley, the father of the three children killed by Morley, filed a formal complaint with Ireland’s Director of Public Prosecutions over how evidence was handled at her 2021 trial.

And one of his central concerns?

💊 THE PSYCHIATRIC MEDICATIONS SHE WAS TAKING.

McGinley argues that the jury should have heard much more detailed evidence about the variety and dosages of prescription drugs Morley was taking before she killed their three children.

He says the omission created what he considers an “incomplete and inaccurate” account of what happened.

Even more interesting:

McGinley says documents released for the children’s upcoming inquests revealed prescription medication in their home issued in the names of two other people—information he says he didn’t discover until August 2025. Separate reporting says this included 30 Xanax tablets not prescribed to Morley.

Now he wants evidence concerning the potential adverse psychiatric effects of prescribed antidepressants considered at his children’s inquests.

And the controversy escalated further.

McGinley wants Morley’s psychiatric diagnosis, treatment and medication examined. Ireland’s HSE argued that examining two years of her treatment would go beyond the proper scope of an inquest. On January 27, the issue reached Ireland’s parliament, where Taoiseach Micheál Martin said he would ask why the HSE had sought to limit the inquiry’s scope.

👀 Now put the timing together.

JANUARY 2026: The Morley case resurfaces—with the father demanding greater scrutiny of antidepressants, psychiatric medication and mental-health treatment.

SUMMER 2026: The Lindsay Clancy trial becomes a national phenomenon—with extensive coverage of 13 psychiatric medications, 30+ prescriptions, SSRIs, alleged overmedication and prescribing practices.

SEPTEMBER 2026: Clancy’s trial ends in a mistrial, but major outlets continue discussing the medication/healthcare-system component.

These are two different cases in two different countries, and this does not establish that medication caused either tragedy.

But considering the remarkable parallels between Morley and Clancy, the fact that the Morley medication controversy independently resurfaced only months before the Clancy trial is another development worth adding to the timeline.

💊 The conversation keeps coming back to the same question:

What role—if any—did psychiatric treatment, prescribing practices and medication play?

And apparently, that conversation was already resurfacing before the Lindsay Clancy trial ever became a national obsession.

[WEFocusUSA @WEFocusUSA71124]

@BamaSaltyMarine Yikes. Those are the people I wonder about, and the same ones who I find it hard to believe they passed a driver’s test… putting everyone else in danger 24/7.

[True Stormy Joe @truestormyjoe]

Dan added Fly Like an Eagle
#FlyEaglesFly

[NewsTreason Channel 17 @NewsTreason]

🚨 THE TRIAL IS OVER — BUT THE PHARMA NARRATIVE ISN’T

Yesterday, the Lindsay Clancy murder trial ended in a MISTRIAL after 7 days of deliberations and 3 separate declarations from the jury that it could not reach a unanimous verdict.

But something important happened as the trial ended.

The pharmaceutical/healthcare narrative did NOT disappear when the jury deadlocked.

In fact, it is now becoming part of the media’s explanation of what this entire 5-week national spectacle was about.

📰 AP

New post-mistrial retrospective is literally titled:

“Key moments in the Lindsay Clancy case: the 911 call, mental health care, mistrial.”

AP describes Clancy’s mental-health care as one of the defining components of the trial.

Its reporting recounts how Clancy’s mental health deteriorated after childbirth, how she sought specialists, and how she was prescribed multiple psychiatric medications before eventually entering a psychiatric hospital.

📰 PEOPLE

People’s immediate post-mistrial coverage continues describing the defense as centered on postpartum psychosis AND overmedication.

Not simply:

“She was mentally ill.”

But:

MENTAL ILLNESS + OVERMEDICATION.

📰 THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

The Journal’s post-mistrial coverage goes beyond postpartum psychosis as well.

It points readers toward Clancy’s continuing malpractice litigation, which alleges that her doctors misdiagnosed her and worsened her condition through improper treatment.

The media had spent weeks exposing an enormous national audience to Clancy’s psychiatric treatment history—including repeated discussion of her numerous psychiatric prescriptions, medication changes, SSRIs, alleged overmedication and questions surrounding the treatment she received.

Then something particularly interesting happened.

📰 STAT

On September 1, STAT—a major health and medical publication—published an extraordinary essay by a reproductive psychiatrist essentially pushing back against the narrative developing around the trial.

The headline:

“I’m a reproductive psychiatrist. The Lindsay Clancy trial will cause terrible damage to my field.”

She argues that Clancy’s defense effectively put psychiatry itself on trial.

She describes the emerging public question as:

“Did the health care system fail her?”

She says the defense portrayed psychiatrists as spending too little time with patients, failing to listen and trying too many drugs.

Think about that.

Her response demonstrates that the conversation exists.

A reproductive psychiatrist felt the Clancy trial had generated enough public skepticism toward psychiatric drugs and psychiatric care that she wrote an entire national commentary warning about its consequences.

DA Timothy Cruz walked outside the courthouse and made what may be the most interesting statement of this entire narrative:

“This case is not about the healthcare system, or about how women are treated in it, or what diagnoses there are.”

Read that again.

“THIS CASE IS NOT ABOUT THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM.”

Why would the district attorney need to explicitly say that?

Because somewhere during 5 weeks of wall-to-wall coverage, the healthcare system had become part of the national conversation surrounding this case.

But none of those things are necessary to recognize the observable sequence:

➡️ 1 family-murder trial receives extraordinary national amplification.

➡️ The coverage repeatedly highlights psychiatric medications, antidepressants, SSRIs, multiple prescriptions, changing drug regimens and alleged overmedication.

➡️ A major medical publication responds with a psychiatrist warning that the trial is damaging public confidence in psychiatric medication and psychiatry itself.

➡️ The trial ends in a mistrial.

➡️ Major outlets continue carrying the overmedication / psychiatric-treatment / healthcare-system component into their post-trial coverage.

And the DA explicitly tells the country:

“THIS CASE IS NOT ABOUT THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM.”

THAT’s what I’m watching.

[WEFocusUSA @WEFocusUSA71124]

… AND the insanity that is destroying our country. However many people think any of this is ok, are the same number who need to be in a state hospital for psychos. I know the drugs are a problem, but the psychos need to be off the streets while they get leveled out, or it is determined they are dangerous.

[WEFocusUSA @WEFocusUSA71124]

@doogadoo11 Thank you.

[Parallel 8 Media @markmessina]

That sure is a lot of coincidences in the Lindsey Clancy case.

[Lampshades @lampshades_2]

The three planes that hit their targets on 9/11 show characteristics of pre-programmed autonomous control rather than human piloting. American Airlines Flight 11 maintained a high-speed nearly level final approach into the North Tower, United Airlines Flight 175 executed a coordinated high-bank turn into the South Tower at still greater ground speed, and American Airlines Flight 77 completed a descending spiral of continuous high-rate inputs into the western facade of the Pentagon.

The terminal segments of all three paths display a cluster of features characteristic of pre-programmed guidance. Sustained high kinetic energy was held into impact without measurable deceleration, continuous high-rate control-surface deflections maintained precise bank angles and pitch attitudes under elevated dynamic pressure, and the resulting geometric profiles remained smooth and free of the intermittent pauses typical of manual correction. Precise alignment to the chosen targets occurred without energy bleed or any recovery pitch-up, producing a lack of measurable variability across the independent trajectories.

Professional human pilots under calm conditions and with the explicit goal of striking the same targets would be expected to manage energy by reducing speed in the final approach and to introduce minor course and pitch corrections for refined alignment. Such behavior generates intermittent control inputs, observable variability in bank and heading, and a measurable bleed of kinetic energy prior to impact, none of which appear in the recorded paths.

Amateur pilots operating under the chaotic conditions of an active hijacking would face still greater obstacles. Limited aircraft type experience, cognitive load from the ongoing struggle, and the inertial demands of large commercial jets at high speed make the simultaneous achievement of continuous high-rate inputs, unvarying geometric precision, and zero energy management across three separate aircraft markedly less feasible than the same performance under automated command.

Given the independence of the three trajectories and the cumulative departure from expected human energy management and input patterns, the joint probability that all three were accomplished by human pilots falls substantially below ten percent once the assumed availability of remote-control autopilot is granted.

[Autist The 17th @AutistDivision]

Ayatoldya. 🤭

@PapiTrumpo

[🇺🇸🍩 JULIE DONUTS 🇺🇸🍩 @Juliedonuts]

Oh it’s going to cost them ALL EVERYTHING.

All of it.
All of them.

Dark to Light. Praise God ✝️🙏

[JustLikeGizmo @JustLikeGizmo]

Syria… in the last 3 weeks

[WEFocusUSA @WEFocusUSA71124]

@BadgedPatriot Ppl are such turds and so ego driven. One day, it’ll be their turn to need assistance, and some dipshit Karen will be holding up traffic.

[WEFocusUSA @WEFocusUSA71124]

@holonabove @Christophe93714 I am heartbroken for your family. Know that you all are in my prayers. I’m so sorry.

[SpiritualStreetfighter 17 @SpiritualSF_17]

The Best Is Yet To Come! 🇺🇸

[Sunny ☀️ @SwanMom312]

@qaggnews @DcLidstone 🙏🏼🤍

[True Stormy Joe @truestormyjoe]

I’ve been saying Cohen is part of the show the whole time.

This should confirm it

[WEFocusUSA @WEFocusUSA71124]

Wow ⚡️

[Svetlana Lokhova @RealSLokhova]

October 27, 2019

I flew to NYC at my own expense to give very important testimony to the American people on Maria Bartiromo’s show. I stayed in a hotel near the studio, again at my own expense. This was during the Special Counsel Durham investigation, which I assisted.

I am an eyewitness to the Grand Conspiracy against President Trump, which started in 2015, directed by Obama and implemented by the CIA, MI6, the FBI, and the media.

I spoke to Maria and her producers for weeks in advance to make sure they understood the importance of the story. I was not paid a cent for all the hours I spent on this. It was really important that a major network finally told the truth to the American people.

On the morning of the interview, I was driven by a car arranged by Fox. I had hair and makeup done. The interview was recorded.

Then someone in the Fox leadership ordered that my interview not be aired. After the public outcry, Maria even retweeted the demand for it to be shown. A one-minute extract was then shown weeks later behind the Fox Nation paywall.

The full interview was never aired. Someone blocked it. The presidential election was one year away.

[The SCIF @TheSCIF]

Imagine if Trump sent $1.7 BILLION dollars to Iran, with $400 MILLION of it sent on an unmarked plane, in the middle of the night, without Congress even knowing about it...

Obama is a traitor who should be in prison.

[Deep Leaks @DeepLeaksHQ]

Nicole Wallace forgets to mention that her star guest, NYT's Mike Schmidt, is actually her husband who is in deep trouble for publishing leaks of classified information from that sanctimonious git Comey as part of the Grand Conspiracy.
Her other guest, Andrew Weissmann faked the Mueller report, also part of the Grand Conspiracy investigation.