@ScribesShade @scrowder The “He started it!” line of inquiry seems rather childish and pointless at this point. Moreover, neither made any effort to de-escalate it either. Furthermore, those content creators are surely less interested in assigning blame than they are in securing income presently.
@Luceobrien@Charalanahzard Except Crowder is walking away largely unscathed (he doesn’t really rely on YouTube’s partner program for revenue), yet YouTube’s bots are running roughshod over countless smaller channels simply caught in the crossfire. It isn’t the politics at issue, it’s the execution.
@dylxnwrxght @leonardjfrench @gaywonk But instead of just dealing with Crowder, @TeamYouTube unleashed its bots on countless other channels with nary a concern for the harm it would do. As pathetic as Gaywonk’s virtue signaling is, YouTube’s response is tangibly hurtful to its precious “community.” #VoxAdpocalypse
@Futterish@trevor_ruben Used games *could* have been a part of the ecosystem, but GameStop never made used games a compelling value proposition sufficient to overcome the convenience of digital.
@HoegLaw I am uninterested in these two fools. The concern is that YouTube’s means of enforcement is to unleash its algorithmic bots on the smaller channels first, carelessly demonetizing the most vulnerable creators as guinea pigs until the bots learn how to manage larger channels later.
@YouTubeInsider TL;DR, “We will loose our algorithm upon smaller channels, demonetizing those channels with abandon as we train our bots to actually deal with the larger channels.”
@OTLonESPN@arielhelwani The only universe in which Conor deserves an immediate rematch against Kabib is in Ariel’s gay fantasies.
Get off Conor’s dick Ariel.