Willy Forbath

[Willy Forbath @WForbath]

@RonnieGrinberg @PrincetonUPress @nytimes @jenszalai Awesome

[Democracy Now! @democracynow]

Renowned labor organizer Jane McAlevey (@rsgexp) says the UAW's success in unionizing a Volkswagen plant in Tennessee was "a beatdown" of management. A bigger test, she says, will be whether workers can do the same at Mercedes in Alabama.

[Willy Forbath @WForbath]

@cori_crider Thanks, Cori! How goes?

[Willy Forbath @WForbath]

LPE is running a Symposium on Aziz Rana’s great new book. Here’s my post. https://t.co/8GjM5LoSaM

[EJ Dionne @EJDionne]

Will the Supreme Court ignore what the Constitution (and the 16th Amendment) actually say and extend special tax protections to the very, very rich? Check out this excellent piece by ⁦@joeyfishkin⁩ & ⁦@WForbath⁩. https://t.co/8DoHwSgF8a

[New York Times Opinion @nytopinion]

In a case about taxes and the wealthy, the conservative Supreme Court justices should practice the originalism they preach and listen to the framers and ratifiers of the 16th Amendment, say @joeyfishkin and @WForbath. Read: https://t.co/3DlADWrjS3

[Susie Morse @susancmorse]

I'm delighted that Stanford Law Review Online will publish my essay with Leah Butterfield, Abortion Pills Are Here to Stay. https://t.co/3KlcrzAfk7 🧵

[Humanit'Elles @humanitelles]

“Sexe, amour et féminisme” ou les aventures épistolaires de Simone de Beauvoir
@TiphaineMartin6 @VADMC74 @claudinemonteil @PeurFeminisme @LesAgiteuses @bibMarguerite @BUAngers
https://t.co/2Bm7km8a3Q (Abonné.e.s)

[Zorka Milin @ZorkaMilin]

Protecting the wealthy from taxation is at odds with the fundamentals of originalism which many Supreme Court justices hold.
Important amicus brief in the Moore tax case, by constitutional law professors @BAckermanYale @WForbath @JoeyFishkin
h/t @stevertax
https://t.co/pcLKeUVYDM

[Willy Forbath @WForbath]

@CoreyRobin Skeptical readers are the best. Thanks for sticking with us. From yr longtime fan, Willy Forbath

[UTexasLaw @UTexasLaw]

Wonderful words about @WForbath and @joeyfishkin (@UCLA_Law) and The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution in @NewYorker 👇

[Judy Coffin @judygcoffin]

How Do We Survive the Constitution? | The New Yorker https://t.co/3n38LaZlPW

[Judy Coffin @judygcoffin]

Dealing with an inscrutable text.

[UTexasLaw @UTexasLaw]

🙌Two Texas Law scholars made @lsolum's "Best Of" lists for 2022. @WForbath's The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution, w @joeyfishkin, was a "Favorite Book," @TaraLeighGrove1's The Misunderstood History of Textualism was a "Favorite Article." 1/2

The book 👉 https://t.co/W0RX8RCj08

[Richard Albert @RichardAlbert]

🎉 The 2022 Books of the Year | The Future of Constitutionalism 📚

[UTexasLaw @UTexasLaw]

📣THIS FRIDAY: "Reviving Progressive Constitutional Political Economy," at @GeorgetownLaw and hosted by @acslaw, a conference "Spurred by the publication of @joeyfishkin & @WForbath's book The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution."

Free; registration required: https://t.co/Z4l2hAjbIq

[Willy Forbath @WForbath]

@rddoerfler …Ryan’s right: few of us are stuck in total law skepticism. Noah’s right: we anti-juristocrats could do more to connect the cosmos to the plumbing - more to help outline a radical “law of democracy” that sets out democratic institutional alternatives for the law work.

[Willy Forbath @WForbath]

@rddoerfler …Rather N seems to be saying that we anti-juristocrats can’t just take policy making away from courts without acknowledging you need law-like rules for democratic decisions and adjudication-like institutions to interpret and apply them….

[Willy Forbath @WForbath]

@robertltsai @joeyfishkin @jbouie Thanks, Robert!! And thanks for yr work rekindling pragmatism.