SignalFlow

@WhopsIndicator

Joined June 2026

1 Following

0 Followers

12 Posts

WhopsIndicator retweeted

Jason Reza Jorjani

@Jason_Jorjani

1 day ago

They speak MANY ancient and modern human languages perfectly. I've argued that it's likely their "native" language is what scholars misleadingly call "Proto Indo-European." (Ridley Scott figured this out and incorporated it into PROMETHEUS, but had to cut the key scene because it was so politically incorrect.)

373

WhopsIndicator retweeted

Anton Gerashchenko

@Gerashchenko_en

4 days ago

MEGA THREAD I've wanted to put all the Russian regions that have gas shortages in one place. I think there are a few missing, but still, the selection is impressive.

124

428

145

752K

WhopsIndicator retweeted

Victoria

@victoriaslog

2 days ago

A Russian woman on maternity leave, caring for two small children, was shocked when the military recruitment office repeatedly called her, aggressively pressuring her to work for the “SMO” and falsely claiming that she had applied for it herself. She has realized that everything is even worse than she thought and this is only the beginning.

301

83K

SignalFlow @WhopsIndicator

2 days ago

@LunarysDrizzt @HanzGuenter @Jason_Jorjani He already addressed this in this podcast https://t.co/4HVjVSJnUO

SignalFlow @WhopsIndicator

2 days ago

@HanzGuenter @Jason_Jorjani Here!!! One hour and twenty minutes in he answers your question https://t.co/Dzb5KsTEEG

WhopsIndicator retweeted

Jason Reza Jorjani

@Jason_Jorjani

2 days ago

@Avanti_AI_rev By "the Nordics," I presume you mean the Overlords – not the rebels. In which case, the answer is that the biggest question is whether the Syndicate will surrender Earth to them or attempt a rebellion against them. It hasn't been decided yet.

SignalFlow @WhopsIndicator

2 days ago

@HanzGuenter @Jason_Jorjani Here!!! One hour and twenty minutes in he answers your question https://t.co/Dzb5KsTEEG

SignalFlow @WhopsIndicator

3 days ago

@WiseOwl31 @Jason_Jorjani https://t.co/uhyKxz8oqs

Jason Reza Jorjani

@Jason_Jorjani

7 days ago

BREAKAWAY NAZIS. Clip from a show released on April 7, 2025. https://t.co/LDJfjn3eQ1

179

13K

WhopsIndicator retweeted

Atlas of Mystery

@atlasofmystery

6 days ago

Reagan Official John Herrington Allegedly Said Full Alien Disclosure Could Cause Global Chaos *Discussion Brent Friedman says future United States Secretary of Energy John Herrington privately told him that the truth about aliens was being concealed through a multibillion dollar propaganda program because full disclosure could destabilize religion, the global economy and the authority of governments around the world. Friedman is a Hollywood writer and producer who later cocreated the television series Dark Skies. According to his account, John S. Herrington was not simply a government official whose name he encountered later in life. Herrington was a close family friend whom Friedman had known since childhood. He later served as a senior official in the Reagan administration and became United States Secretary of Energy. Friedman says the conversation took place in 1981, when he was 18 years old. He claims Herrington had recently undergone months of classified briefings while living in an underground facility in West Virginia. According to Friedman, Herrington said those briefings affected him so deeply that he cried himself to sleep every night. When Friedman asked what he had learned, Herrington allegedly told him: “Aliens are real, they are here, and I have seen them.” Friedman says he then asked how such a reality could remain hidden from the public. Herrington allegedly answered that many people already knew. According to Friedman, Herrington told him that anyone could enter a bookstore and find books containing genuine information about the subject. The problem, he said, was that those books would be placed beside other books produced as part of the concealment effort. Friedman recalls Herrington describing the cover up and propaganda system as a multibillion dollar initiative designed to protect the secret. The method he allegedly described was not the complete removal of accurate information. It was the deliberate mixing of truth with falsehood. In that model, authentic accounts could remain publicly available because they would be surrounded by fabricated claims, misleading narratives and contradictory material. The public would encounter both genuine and false information but would have no reliable way to determine which was which. This would allow the truth to remain visible while also remaining socially discredited. Friedman says the scale of the claim was difficult for him to comprehend at 18. He had lived through the Watergate era, but he says he did not yet understand how a long term government secrecy and propaganda operation could function. The idea that such a program might have continued for decades and consumed billions of dollars was beyond anything he had previously considered. Friedman says he then asked whether the truth would ever become public. According to his account, Herrington replied that it might emerge during their lifetime if disclosure became necessary. Friedman continued pressing him. He asked why people could not simply be told the truth. Friedman says Herrington responded that the complete reality was far more complex than the limited information he had already shared. Herrington allegedly identified religion as one of the main concerns. According to Friedman, Herrington argued that the United States was a deeply religious country and that a revelation capable of undermining the foundations of religious belief could produce major social upheaval. The argument was not merely that the discovery of alien life would challenge a few specific interpretations of scripture. The wider concern appeared to be that the full truth could alter fundamental beliefs about humanity, creation, authority and the nature of existence. Friedman says Herrington then identified the global economy as the second major risk. According to the account, Herrington believed the global economic system was the principal structure holding the modern world together. If that system were seriously disrupted, governments could lose their ability to maintain control over their populations. The result, he allegedly warned, could be widespread chaos. Herrington’s reported reasoning was therefore not that the public had no right to know. It was that disclosure might create consequences more destructive than continued secrecy. Friedman recalls Herrington essentially asking what purpose revealing the truth would serve if the outcome were social collapse, economic disruption and a world made worse by the disclosure. This part of the story provides broader context for Herrington’s earlier alleged statement that the world was not the one he thought he was bringing his daughters into. According to Friedman, Herrington was not only disturbed by the reported existence of nonhuman beings. He appeared to believe that the complete truth carried implications for religion, economics, political authority and the stability of civilization itself. There is no recording of the private conversation Friedman describes. No classified documents are presented that confirm the alleged briefing program, the claimed propaganda operation or Herrington’s statements about disclosure. Herrington never publicly confirmed Friedman’s account. The story relies on Friedman’s memory of a conversation that he says occurred more than four decades ago. Friedman also says Herrington warned him that if he ever repeated the story and used Herrington’s name, Herrington would deny it because denial was part of how the secrecy system operated. That warning makes the account difficult to test. A later denial could be interpreted as evidence against Friedman’s story or, within the logic of the story itself, as exactly the response Friedman says he was told to expect. The claim therefore remains unverified. Even so, the alleged method of concealment is worth examining on its own. A secrecy system would not necessarily need to erase every witness, destroy every document or remove every accurate book. It might only need to flood the subject with enough unreliable material that no claim could achieve broad credibility. If authentic information were deliberately mixed with fiction, exaggeration and propaganda, how would the public ever determine which parts of the story were real?