William DK

Community @Coleta_Cripto 🇧🇷 | @sanctum earnest 🚀 | SOLANA maxi

[William DK @WilliamDK_]

I'm going to post my opinion here, which I also posted on the forum, for those who don't follow along. 🧵👇

What do you think of @sanctumso 's new @CLOUD-3 proposal?

https://t.co/OrIBzHHeUD

[cloudvestor relations ☁️ @cloud]

CLOUD-003 is now live.

Join the cloudfam discussion in the Sanctum Forum.

[Sophon @Sophon]

Today, we're decommissioning the Sophon Chain.

You don't find product-market fit by defending sunk costs. Instead, you learn and adapt.

[William DK @WilliamDK_]

@KASTcard 🎊💃🇧🇷🤫

[William DK @WilliamDK_]

@Coleta_Cripto solta os ingressos pra nós
😂

[William DK @WilliamDK_]

Quem reclama de referral reclama de tudo, vamo seguir fazendo o nosso, comunidade tá de graça pelo valor que a gente entrega, sem vender ilusão,
1 - ninguém vai te dar o token que vai valorizar 10x.
2 - ninguém vai te dar a pool de liquidez de 10% ao dia livre de iL.
3 - ninguém vai tomar as decisões por você.
As pessoas podem continuar acreditando em guru de cripto se frustando e chorando no X reclamando de quem tem resultado, ou pode botar a mão na massa assumir a responsabilidade e começar a progredir, cola com nós pequenos haterzinhos bora fazer dinheiros
o melhor de tudo é que não tem fidelidade entrou não gostou é só não renovar, simples 😉

[𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐄𝐓𝐀 🇧🇷 🇮🇹 @Coleta_Cripto]

Engraçado que os chorão de referral são os que vendem comunidade por mais de 2000 reais 🤡🤡🤡🤡

Hahahahahahhaha

[William DK @WilliamDK_]

3) Jupiter vs. Aave (practical comparison)

-Liquidation cost:
-Jupiter: ~2% fee on debt.
-Aave: commonly 5–10% liquidation bonus to liquidators (varies by asset/market).
-Outcome: for the same notional debt, liquidation on Jupiter generally costs the borrower less and dilutes less value, while LPs are still compensated via the fee.

-Capital efficiency near the edge:
-Jupiter targets a high liquidation_margin (94–95%) with explicit short-delay buffers derived from observed volatility.
-Aave uses asset-specific LTV/Liquidation Thresholds and a Health Factor; conservative thresholds plus higher bonuses can reduce effective headroom at similar risk tolerance.
-Outcome: borrowers on Jupiter can run higher usable LTV with clearer short-delay risk modeling; Aave offers robust, asset-by-asset risk frameworks but typically with higher liquidation penalties.

-Pool imbalance risk handling:
-Jupiter explicitly prices the risk that liquidations can push JLP underweight in USDC, compensating LPs via the 2% fee and monitoring drift dynamics.
-Aave relies on deep liquidity and isolated risk per asset with standard incentives for liquidators; no multi-asset pool rebalancing exposure like a single JLP basket.
-Outcome: Jupiter’s design internalizes pool-imbalance risk and compensates LPs directly; Aave externalizes most imbalance risk to broader market liquidity and liquidator incentives.

-Operational takeaway:
-If you care about lower liquidation costs and high LTV headroom informed by short-horizon volatility, Jupiter’s new set is attractive.
-If you prefer asset-specific risk controls, massive cross-market liquidity, and a traditional money market model, Aave remains strong—though liquidations may be more punitive.

[William DK @WilliamDK_]

1) What changed and why it matters
New parameters: maintenance_margin = 90%, liquidation_margin = 94–95%, liquidation_fee = 2%.
Goal: keep loans competitive while protecting LPs via a calibrated safety buffer against short execution delays and short-horizon drawdowns.
"Key intuition: borrowers get higher capital efficiency and lower liquidation costs; LPs get compensated for delay/volatility risk through the buffer + fee design."

2) Practical examples (how the math works now)

-Setup: collateral = JLP worth $100,000; debt is in USDC.
-Definitions (simplified):
-LTV = Debt/CollateralDebt/Collateral
-Maintenance threshold at 90%: stay at/under this to avoid warnings/soft risk.
-Liquidation threshold at 95%: cross this and the position can be liquidated.
-Liquidation fee at 2%: paid on debt upon liquidation to compensate LPs.

[Jupiter @JupiterExchange]

JLP Loans just got better for borrowers!

After extensive analysis, we’ve implemented 3 key changes to make JLP Loans even more competitive:

1. Borrow more upfront

Max LTV increased from 83% ⇒ 90%. Take out larger initial loans against your collateral, now up to 90% of its value.

2. More room before liquidations

Liquidation LTV increased from 86% ⇒ 95%. Your position won’t be liquidated until your debt reaches 95% of the value of your collateral. This gives you more breathing room during periods of volatility.

3. Lower liquidation penalties

Liquidation fees reduced from 6% ⇒ 2%. In the event of a liquidation, you’ll pay 67% less.

Taken all together:
• Larger Loans
• Higher Liquidation Thresholds
• Less Liquidation Fees

The same JLP Loans that you’ve come to love, but improved across every metric.

Read more about it here: https://t.co/PjVAi0jNBU

[William DK @WilliamDK_]

A) Higher-efficiency borrow with buffer headroom

-Borrow at LTV = 92% → Debt = 0.92×100,000=$92,0000
-1% JLP drawdown before next price/exec:
-Collateral → $99,000
-New LTV → 92,000/99,000≈92.93% (still < 95% → not liquidated)
-Headroom preserved despite a quick 1% move.

B) Near-threshold borrow and short-delay shock

-Borrow at LTV = 94% → Debt = $94,000
-1% drawdown during execution delay:
-Collateral → $99,000
-New LTV → 94,000/99,000≈94.95% (still < 95% → typically safe)

-2% drawdown during delay:
-Collateral → $98,000
-New LTV → 94,000/98,000≈95.92% (≥ 95% → liquidation eligible)

C) What happens on liquidation (cost impact)

-Suppose liquidation triggers at Debt = $94,000
-With 2% fee, penalty = 0.02×94,000=$1,880
-Effective borrower loss from fee is materially lower than common 5–10% fees.

D) Why the 94–95% liquidation_margin with 2% fee is “safe”

-Short-horizon JLP drawdowns observed (illustrative percentiles over 5 min): ~0.88% (p99.9), ~1.69% (p99.99), ~2.54% (p99.999).
-The chosen combo (liquidation_margin 94–95% + 2% fee) provides coverage for typical 1–5 min delays while keeping LTVs competitive.

[William DK @WilliamDK_]

If I may give you a spoiler, the token is pump because of three main points.

1. Trust: $CLOUD presents clear rules in metrics, with no manipulation, no strange OTC movements, no pump dumps from market makers, and a quarterly report to ensure even greater transparency.

2. Solid project: Sanctum brings a solid project with consistent growth, always bringing innovations and a clear horizon for increasing revenue and project metrics, which will obviously be reflected in the token.

3. Speculation: Although the $CLOUD token guarantees participation in the project's governance, it still doesn't have much utility in DeFi projects. This may seem bad to some, but intelligent people see this with great enthusiasm if the token already has little utility, it already has good fundamentals; when integrations increase, the token could experience significant appreciation.

This makes $CLOUD one of the best asymmetries in the current market. I've already secured my slice of this pie since the airdrop and managed to double the position during the ASR, I remain bullish.

[Eno @YouKnowEno]

why is CLOUD pumping?

learn everything sanctum is doing to align the company with our native token over the long term.

join our investor chat. more signal. less noise. 👇

[Eno @YouKnowEno]

why is CLOUD pumping?

learn everything sanctum is doing to align the company with our native token over the long term.

join our investor chat. more signal. less noise. 👇

[Rome @RomeProtocol]

🏛️ The Empire opens its gates.

IMPERIA: Rome Citizens

Whitelist Access is live. ⚔️
https://t.co/t3FgZRZ2XH

📜 Details in thread 👇

[The Backwoods @TheBackwoodsSol]

🍃 $LEAF is around the corner!

📦 Total Supply: 1B $LEAF
🔓 15% Initial Release

5% Early Adopters
2% LEAF Season Participants
1% Hero NFT Holders
1% Collab Communities
1% Crystal Purchasers
5% Liquidity

📅 Sept 9, 2025 | 2PM UTC

🚫 No Presale
🚫 No VC / Team dumps
✅ Check your eligibility:
https://t.co/QyXKAhjwUF

[Toby 🦦 @StakeToby]

The Capped Goodlist is HERE! 🧢😉

3 - 14 Sep: Capped Goodlist
██ Sep: Mainnet Phase 1 &amp; SOL Vault

Submit Solana wallet here ⤵️
https://t.co/5e23zWVZVp

Launch partners will be announced soon.

More spots are now open for Validators and Institutions too, more below.

1/🦦

[Sanctum ☁️ @sanctumso]

Horizon 2025 https://t.co/qXZervjfCf

[Sanctum ☁️ @sanctumso]

Integrate once, optimize anytime.

After initial Gateway setup, teams get full-stack transaction observability and execution management in one place—no code changes required.

[William DK @WilliamDK_]

@sanctumso No manipulation, no underhand sales, no suspicious transactions, I ☁️ YOU

[Sanctum ☁️ @sanctumso]

1/ Introducing Sanctum Quarterly ☁️

This report kicks off $CLOUD Holder Relations: our next step in setting the industry standard for token transparency.

It follows our 40/40 Blockworks Token Transparency score and internal token audit completion.

[William DK @WilliamDK_]

@RemiluxMaker AURA AURA AURA🙏

[Remilux @RemiluxMaker]

Final giveaway before staking rewards officially begin—your last chance to grab a rare Remilux NFT before Aura farming kicks in.

How to enter: Like, Retweet and Comment "Aura"
Prize: 1 Remilux NFT
Duration: 48 hours only

Secure your spot now. Don't miss the start of something legendary.

https://t.co/wrjAP9na1g

[Remilux @RemiluxMaker]

A Milady has been acquired.

The Protocol nears: staking live soon.
Website and contract are ready, awaiting audit clearance.

Lock your Remilux for 90 days. The greatest prizes await.

(((+)))

[William DK @WilliamDK_]

eu não consigo explicar como um jogo simples como o @TheBackwoodsSol me prende tanto, sempre que tenho um tempo livre eu puxo uma partida pra ver se consigo subir mais nos rankings de high score e garantir meu lugar no top 50 de todas as fases.