@DataInforms Its easier for the pro-globalists and the ALP, just shut everything down, for as long as it takes, in the name of protecting the vulnerable. Fits ideologically for the latter, and the agenda of the former, for 'one world' against a 'common enemy'.
If anti-body tests end up showing this thing really is widespread, endemic among the population, then this raises some interesting possibilities. Remember there is also lots of evidence SARS II is NOT very infectious, even on a cruise ship, in family homes, or in an Indian slum..
@DataInforms I feel your frustration, looking for a coherent policy stance from this government will drive you nuts. This thing caught them out totally, is not part of their agenda or worldview, so they are just making it up on the fly.
@DataInforms We know from the nutrition debates that when evidence is all over the place, am thinking LDL for example, it usually means the paradigm is wrong. Sorting out the contradictions only comes when another one altogether is adopted. I don't have one myself, am just flagging the issue.
@DataInforms Any account certainly needs to explain that feature, it looks like an infectious outbreak in many ways, although in others it doesn't. I'm not sure where we will end up on these issues, there are a lot of contradictory factors to try and sort through.
@nntaleb I don't think Greece could afford this pandemic, they decide to pass thank you, seems to be an option this virus allows nations. Either that or the ouzo.
@DataInforms Its just another hypothesis to throw up in the failure of the official narrative, am trying to be creative in the face of that failure, throwing possibilities into the mix. There is so much that requires explanation, so little that actually makes sense at this point.
I've argued elsewhere https://t.co/sVk3wh4XcG that treatment protocols may be the reason COVID-19 patients fare so badly once in the medical system. Here Paul Mason adds another factor - hospital food and its effect on the immune system. Take a look https://t.co/7dzM8Qzeg6
Here's a test in logic. If 99% of people with SARS II don't get COVID-19, then how is it the cause of disease in the 1% who do ? The concept of causality loses all meaning if used in this way.