Wrex

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@dee011235 @DanisMCFC no handball. the ball hit his thigh first. learn the rules.

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@utdcynical yes, the keeper didn't control the ball. it's an assist.

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

When on LinkedIn, make sure to have dark mode ON https://t.co/fFI9AHTfkH

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@azania1023 @WhiteHouse TDS

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@MarkJCarney Does this look like a strong leader?

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@TheJohnnyDee @ZPoet

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@WeAreCanProud

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@WeBrokeCom Who is she?

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@nocontextfooty Watch it at 0.25x speed.

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@DemosKratosCA They are brainwashed. They are glued to the TV.

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@ASUS_ROG How much did Intel pay ASUS to limit the AMD Zephyrus G16 to the problematic 8GB of VRAM? Also, a Scar 18 without a 9955hx3d and 5090 configuration? I hope the deal they struck with Intel makes up for lost sales.

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@aditya21genxian *equals 4090 performance with DLSS4 which is 4x frame generation. ​​There are performance bar graphs on nvidia website. 50-series cards are around 20%-30% faster than 40-series with RT, but they have more and better RT cores. The true raster performance is less than 30%.

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@hardwarezone You got bamboozled.*5070 = 4090 with DLSS4 which is 4x frame gen. There are performance bar graphs on nvidia website. 50-series cards are around 20%-30% faster than 40-series with RT, but they have more and better RT cores. The true raster performance is less than 30%.

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@DaRealKennyLuv *equals 4090 performance with DLSS4 which is 4x frame generation. ​​There are performance bar graphs on nvidia website. 50-series cards are around 20%-30% faster than 40-series with RT, but they have more and better RT cores. The true raster performance is less than 30%.

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@kernelkook *equals 4090 performance with DLSS4 which is 4x frame generation. ​​There are performance bar graphs on nvidia website. 50-series cards are around 20%-30% faster than 40-series with RT, but they have more and better RT cores. The true raster performance is less than 30%.

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@Beekeyyy *equals 4090 performance with DLSS4 which is 4x frame generation. ​​There are performance bar graphs on nvidia website. 50-series cards are around 20%-30% faster than 40-series with RT, but they have more and better RT cores. The true raster performance is less than 30%.

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@bigbodytee_ *equals 4090 performance with DLSS4 which is 4x frame generation. ​​There are performance bar graphs on nvidia website. 50-series cards are around 20%-30% faster than 40-series with RT, but they have more and better RT cores. The true raster performance is less than 30%.

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@sudhageeksout *equals 4090 performance with DLSS4 which is 4x frame generation. The 5070 is around 25% faster than a 4070. ​​(There are performance bar graphs on nvidia website.)

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@miriam_choomie *equals 4090 performance with DLSS4 which is 4x frame generation. ​​There are performance bar graphs on nvidia website. 50-series cards are around 20%-30% faster than 40-series with RT, but they have more and better RT cores. The true raster performance is less than 30%.

[Wrex @Wrex321go]

@kernelkook *equals 4090 performance with DLSS4 which is 4x frame generation. ​​There are performance bar graphs on nvidia website. 50-series cards are around 20%-30% faster than 40-series with RT, but they have more and better RT cores. The true raster performance is less than 30%.