@nobodyfwD Targaryen fans when they pick and choose when to treat the dragons like objects for the incestous invaders vs. “they choose their owners and the targaryens are the worthy ones 🥺”. They CHOSE Ulf and Hugh
@chrismobuckeye@seriouspostonly@WeThrones At least for the whole rapist thing, that was intentional because they wanted people to have a nuanced take on Aegon being both sympathetic while having this crime attached to him(which WAS in the books too anyway)
@Deep_Blue_Dog@truthfinderyou@xiazfan This is extreme cope and implying that the average white woman has some type of standards where they wouldn’t date a white guy lol
@C0REZI@vermithorlover I just wanna say daemon actually did promise them castles but it was rhaenyra that rejected it. Daemon is many things but he was one of the smarter decision makers for team black post-Jace before rhaenyra tripped over herself and lost a 6 dragon lead
@nicolerotting@tsbkii_289@propsicl@FatuiTsaritStar Now you’re moving the goalpost though lmfao. Why would they focus the story so much on sandrone in nod Krai when she’s not there anymore? And why would this dynamic appear elsewhere? You’re forgetting logic for a vendetta
@gatengarden@bat_exhumer Funny part is I don’t even see him being framed as a fool in a way where you make fun of him, rather just feeling bad at how he’s treated like shit .
@ghoulhag They didn’t, Hess explicitly states that it’s supposed to make it “nuanced” to cheer for him. He’s meant to be sympathetic while also having this irredeemable sim attached to him. It was one of the rare things I kinda agree with her on.