Isn’t that why Trump was trying to make a deal?
As for what him doing the right thing? Can things be correct & a gift at the same time?
As for you saying antisemitism is not an Israeli problem it’s a US problem can you expand on that?
The Golan kinda falls under correct & a gift if I’m not mistaken.
As for Gaza to say he lost interest is kinda wild when he’s dealing with NATO Russia & Ukraine, China? Iran? It may be a lot to juggle but since the ceasefire if I’m not mistaken there has been 500+ deaths on the Palestinian side since the ceasefire.
As for Trump leaving Israel to hold the bag?
Trump didn’t publicly protest Israel’s invasion of southern Lebanon.
He said don’t attack Beirut.
Netanyahu attacked Beirut.
Iran sent missles in as a response.
Iran said in a statement that if no one retaliated than that would be it.
Trump publicly said that Netanyahu wouldn’t attack Iran.
Netanyahu attacks Iran.
What am I missing?
Who left who holding the bag in the end?
Google- “Donald Trump’s key actions for Israel and the Jewish people include brokering the Abraham Accords, recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and moving the U.S. Embassy there, and recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights. He also signed executive orders combating antisemitism on college campuses using IHRA definitions. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
A comprehensive list of his administration's major actions includes:
Diplomatic & Regional Actions
•The Abraham Accords: Brokered historic normalization and peace agreements between Israel and four Arab-Muslim nations: the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan, and Morocco via the U.S. Department of State.
•Jerusalem Embassy: Officially recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and moved the American Embassy from Tel Aviv via the American Jewish Committee.
•Golan Heights: Signed a presidential proclamation becoming the first country to officially recognize Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights via The New York Times.
•Pompeo Doctrine: Announced the official U.S. stance that Israeli settlements in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) are not per se inconsistent with international law. [1, 2]
Combating Antisemitism
•Executive Order on Combating Anti-Semitism: Signed an executive order that expanded the interpretation of civil rights laws (Title VI of the Civil Rights Act) to include Judaism as a protected race and national origin, integrating the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition to hold universities accountable for antisemitic hostility via NPR.
Financial & Strategic Actions
•Withdrawal from the Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA): Withdrew the U.S. from the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement and imposed severe economic sanctions on the Iranian regime via the American Jewish Committee.
•Taylor Force Act: Signed legislation halting U.S. economic aid to the Palestinian Authority until it ceased paying stipends to individuals who commit acts of terrorism and to the families of deceased attackers via YouTube. [1]
•UN Defunding & Withdrawals: Cut all funding for the UN Palestinian refugee agency (UNRWA) via Al Jazeera and withdrew the U.S. from UNESCO over the agency's perceived anti-Israel bias via YouTube.
•Increased Military Assistance: Expanded military aid and defense collaboration with the Israeli Defense Forces, including critical investments in missile defense systems via Clingendael Spectator”
@grok is there anything else to add?
@blake_neil@DavidVance Well fella you may know a lot more than I do in that aspect. As far as the Europe goes? Zelenskyy, Macron, EU President lady, Blair, Starmer & Farage. I don’t trust em. Chain saw guys looking a bit fishy too but yeah.. What tis your narrative fella?
@ayceedee24 I don’t think he’s a lunatic, but then again I haven’t looked into his profile. Not gonna start now but blaming Trump for Netanyahu’s actions is a wild one for sure.
You are absolutely right. That should be recognized, I’m not sure in which way but it definitely should. On a side note.. To blame a current president for the actions of another is a strange one. In another sense we should find & prosecute in my opinion the architects & others within it, whomever they may be.
I have said it once, and I will say it again: the strike in Beirut and the Iran conflagration it triggered appears to be driven less by military exigency than by Netanyahu's electoral expediency.
International law recognizes military necessity. It does not recognize political necessity.
Naftali Bennett: "We did nothing to provoke this attack by Iran. We didn't attack them. They attacked us. Any country would exercise the right to self-defense."
Did he forget the past two years? The assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists? The bombing of IRGC commanders? The strikes on Iranian infrastructure? The US war that Israel demanded? That's "nothing"?
Did we inherit better gas prices, grocery prices? Ect? You can keep saying a nuclear Iran but we have had a hostile fellow in North Korea. You can direct to the SOH but tell me how average Americans can feel this “win.” If you said Venezuela.. I may be able to come to a positive but to say we have won? Explain in great detail but don’t forget common fucking sense.