WallStreetAdvisor

The finest candlemakers in the world couldn’t even think of electric light.
We only see what we think is possible.

Retweets are bookmarks.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

Clear and undeniable evidence of image manipulation by Jonas De Ro, known for his cloud brushes and visual effects (VFX).
The acceptance of such deceitful practices reflects the decaying ethical standards of our society.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

@ashtonforbes @Francis85129349 @HometownBuffett Jonas De Ro cloud image fakery saga, from a VFX artist who is known for cloud brushes.
1. Here is the Original Image Jonas snagged from Flickr to make fake cloud image set (1837 to 1845)
(1/3)

[𝔸 𝕣 𝕨 𝕖 𝕟 @arwenevenstarr_]

I hate to admit it, but AF makes a great point. The 4- day-old anonymous Reddit account who “recognized” the cloud images from the Textures website is definitely sus.

Textures’ API is wack and doesn’t prove anything one way or the other. They offered no proof the photos existed prior to 2014.

Jonas’ images are clearly contested, but Textures refuses to share their logs. They refuse to share anything actually, except to an elite few. We are supposed to blindly trust them. And blindly trust Jonas (the known photobasher who specializes in clouds).

I hate this topic and UFOlogy in general so much. Liars, grifters, and dishonest hoaxers.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

@BadKitty2023 @SomeSirGuyDude Easy there pal! I respect the grind it took to get you here, good job!
But this isn't the time to look away from abrasive behavior,

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

@SomeSirGuyDude @BadKitty2023 I hear you and I think many will readily agree with your position.
We're dealing with collateral damage to say the least.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

For anyone navigating sensitive topics, following this advice is the only way to drive past the noise and gain actual traction.

[SomeAiDude? (Not) @SomeSirGuyDude]

Not really no. Try going to court with that attitude and see if the judge will side with you or take away your kids. People lose custody all of the time just based off of their shitty attitude. Ashton is appealing to the court of public opinion. Maybe he gets there eventually because truth does conquer... But it will take way more time than if he's actually invited to important places and doesn't get brushed off for his pathetic snooty attitude. If he actually cares about the pottential ramifications of publicly adopting the technologies he's revealed... Then you would think he would be less of a twat and actually try to get his message across more efficiently for the betterment of humanity.

Nope! He prefers doubling down on the snootiness, self aggrandizement and unwarrented insults. He sounds like nails on a chalkboard to most people and for some reason, he insists that nothing could possibly be gained by that not being the case.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

@SomeSirGuyDude @BadKitty2023 This is easily the most insightful post I’ve read today.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

True, that’s contextual and a DOA like you said. someone overplaying their hand to brutalize and project strength is instantly recognized by credible people as a ��� and it cuts both ways. This is often exploted by bad actors.
True authority never needs to perform or lean on cruelty to command.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

I want to apologize once again to @arwenevenstarr_ for sharing an edited file without verification, wrongly claiming it came from a vetted source, and for how I handled the situation afterward.

I also want to be clear that @arwenevenstarr_ acted in good faith and with integrity. She has consistently shown fairness and care for the truth, and she should never have been pulled into this.

I should have taken responsibility more clearly and sooner, and I regret the confusion and stress my actions caused.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

I want to publicly apologize to Arwen. I made the mistake of forwarding a fabricated file without verifying it first, and I take full responsibility for that. I’m truly sorry.

For clarity: if any editing had been done, frames 5 and onward wouldn’t need to be mismatched since they came from one file. If someone edited only the initial frames, there wouldn’t be a mismatch between frames 4 and 5.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

Baker, did you ever get a response from Bobby? If so, feel free to post that as well. Sharing only one side of a conversation and presenting it as fact isn’t very honest.

Just to be clear, ALL 19 cloud images are fake.

If you want to challenge us, do it the right way, hiding behind temp location and begging to only "View" the image with masks applied is essentially confessing to the fraud.
Listen, for the 100th time; lock down the files and stand behind them. I may even show you how to fix your own fake cloud images, might actually learn something and produce a more convincing attempt next time. :)

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

I want to publicly apologize to Arwen. I made the mistake of forwarding a fabricated file without verifying it first, and I take full responsibility for that. I’m truly sorry.

For clarity: if any editing had been done, frames 5 and onward wouldn’t need to be mismatched since they came from one file. If someone edited only the initial frames, there wouldn’t be a mismatch between frames 4 and 5.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

@arwenevenstarr_ I’m truly sorry. It wasn't your fault.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

To all debunkers/scammers overlords making a living out of planted fakes and disinformation contracts (MW).

This pyromania shockwave, Jonas fake image scam is too obvious, throwing more debunkers at me isnt going to fix it. Hopefully your next scam is well thought through.

Do better next time, i know you will. This one's exposed.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

@BobbyO_ For clarity, i dont know why anyone needs to edit the initial frames and introduce a mismatch between frame 4 and 5. This is odd.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

I want to publicly apologize to Arwen. I made the mistake of forwarding a fabricated file without verifying it first, and I take full responsibility for that. I’m truly sorry.

For clarity: if any editing had been done, frames 5 and onward wouldn’t need to be mismatched since they came from one file. If someone edited only the initial frames, there wouldn’t be a mismatch between frames 4 and 5.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

@subliminating11 @MvonRen @MickWest In the gif I shared, the imaginary flight apparently is flying in a near straight line.

Before arguing advanced optics, @MvonRen plz check whether someone even understands basic optics.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

Here is one example of a fake rotation. The object or mountain in the center rotates as if it is on a tabletop, pinned to the center of the screen.

Mick has been claiming these images shown in the gif came from a real camera on a real flight, but he has never produced any verifiable proof.
That raises serious questions about his understanding of basic optics.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

Long answer: A real camera rotating in roll produces a very specific transformation. It's a rotation about the camera lens axis.
Every feature in the scene rotates around the same pivot point which is the image center, with angular displacement proportional to roll. There is no exception to this rule, none. Mountains, clouds, haze layers, noise, all must obey the same transform.

An optical artifact is even more restricted. A glare, internal reflection, sensor artifact, stabilization residue, or digital processing artifact is frame locked. It must rotate exactly with the sensor. It cannot rotate independently. It cannot pivot around its own centroid.

Any object performing rotation outside these rules is considered independent and not an optical artifact.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

Correcting for pitch/ bank is required to establish a camera reference frame baseline. Once the video is leveled, the background scene defines how the sensor and optics are rotating.
Anything coming from the optics or sensor is frame locked. Once you level for pitch and bank, it has to rotate with the frame.

Marik is removing camera motion first. That lets you see whether the object is just an artifact or doing something on its own.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

To all debunkers/scammers overlords making a living out of planted fakes and disinformation contracts (MW).

This pyromania shockwave, Jonas fake image scam is too obvious, throwing more debunkers at me isnt going to fix it. Hopefully your next scam is well thought through.

Do better next time, i know you will. This one's exposed.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

Good work confirming this, Arwen. Thank you.

I will give the debunkers credit for hard labor and putting their con skills to work. They have pushed this scam for over a decade.
But they also need intelligence, not just brute force, if they expect people to believe something as absurd as their flat earth narrative.

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

@arwenevenstarr_ https://t.co/yk0P03rBfU

[WallStreetAdvisor @WSAdvisor_]

Pyromania debunker scam. Why are they so desperate to make these videos disappear? How strongly do they believe the videos are real that they go this far, planting evidence and scrubbing anything that could expose the fraud?

The debunker scammers inserted a static satellite video background into the initial progressive shockwave frames.
A frozen background inside a dynamic blast wave is a dead giveaway. It is crude manipulation and it exposes the scam instantly.