@ZeusIsARed@actualAlexJames@ArtemisShebu Idk, I would say banning half the population from an entire industry disqualifies him from even speaking the word libertarian
@imthemysterybox @keepnit1hundo @docteetor @DivineVampy @grok@MomsPostingLs You realize the sample size of... *checks notes*... MILLIONS OF MARRIAGES every year, is gigantic to an absolutely unheard degree in social sciences, right? Like wtf are you smoking?
@davidgaw@mattyglesias The liberal version of female empowerment and sustainable family structures are fundamentally incompatible. They are polar opposites and cannot physically coexist.
It's quite obvious, because it takes a woman physically delivering a child, during which she can't work
@dehenau_@mattyglesias You might have something remotely resembling a point if the current US was the entirety of world history.
Look at any other country or any other time in history and you'll instantly see this has nothing to do with it
@mattyglesias You will call any solution disempowering to women (whatever the fuck that is supposed to mean), because having kids will mean women being out of the work force more, by pure physical necessity. There's no way around that.
So you really just don't want to solve the problem at all
@ZbynekDrab@mattyglesias There are plenty of things we can do, but anything that works is inherently unpalatable to liberals, because they don't actually want to solve the problem.
Having kids means women are out of the work force more. There's no way around that. It's an impossible equation
@n243227@brenspole@Caraz_AU@OMGTheMess Yeah no... Not even close... Women are orders of magnitude lower on sex drive, they just don't contain it at all, because men will never deny them. Guess why? Because the man has a higher sex drive...